Preview

The Rights And Freedoms Of Rubin Hurricane Carter

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
512 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Rights And Freedoms Of Rubin Hurricane Carter
Divraj Gill
T. Chaudhry
CLU3M0-B
Monday, November 3rd, 2014

Rubin “Hurricane” Carter

Many rights and freedoms of Rubin Carter were violated due to the wrongful conviction, which he spent 20 years of his life in prison. Rubin was convicted twice for the triple homicide. The levels of government that were presented in the film and the case are both federal and provincial. The New Jersey Supreme Court declared Rubin guilty twice, a provincial function. The federal function in the movie was shown when Rubin’s lawyer filed a writ of habeas corpus to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. There, Rubin was declared innocent and released from prison immediately.
Personally, I believe the legal and justice
…show more content…
Rubin, African- American boxer, was convicted by all white jury a year after the American civil war, so where’s the justice in that? The authorities hid the evidence that could’ve helped the defendant. It took Rubin 20 years to proclaim his innocence, the legal and justice system ruined 2 decades of Rubin’s life that he could’ve used in order to become more successful. What led to the miscarriage of justice experienced by Cater was corruption and racism. A racist cop named Vincent Della Pesca was obsessed with ruining Rubin’s life, Carter was sent to jail three times because of him. The cop framed Rubin for many crimes because of the resources available to him but I believe the US’s constitution should create something like The Charter Of Rights and Freedoms in order to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This case takes place in a meeting between employees of the Florida Project for Human Justice at the Florida State Prison. Diane Epps a fifty-five-year-old Caucasian woman, Executive director, Joe Moran, the other lead attorney (only African American staff), Cynthia Sanders a petite 28-year-old Caucasian woman, the mitigation investigator, and an accountant, Jose Arnada, a thirty-four Mexican American man; the client, was sentenced the death penalty for a crime that he did not commit. Cynthia, the protagonist, is meeting with Diane and Joe to discuss ways to show Jose is competent to write his own appeal.…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Athlete. Born May 6, 1937, in Clifton, New Jersey. In 1966, at the height of his boxing career, Carter was wrongly convicted—twice—of a triple murder and imprisoned for nearly two decades. During the mid-1970s, his case became a cause celébrè for a number of civil rights leaders, politicians, and entertainers. He was ultimately exonerated, in 1985, after a United States district court judge declared the convictions to be based on racial prejudice.…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ava Duvernay 13th Essay

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages

    It compellingly ties the myth of black criminality pushed forward in D.W. Griffith’s The Birth of the Nation with what was see evidenced in TV show like Cops and in the media portrayal of police shootings. It conveys the corporations that directly benefit from the mass incarceration of black men—companies with like CCA, Aramark, and Corizon—as having more in common with southern plantation owners of the 1800’s than any of us would care to admit. Additionally, it surfaces the institutions such as ALEC which were created to undermine the regular american and benefit lobbyists, corporations, and politicians. But perhaps what was even more powerful was the film’s forgotten tragedies― one we don’t know, but should ― like that of Kalief Browder, whose unjust three-year imprisonment at Rikers Island led to his suicide at…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In conclusion, the Scottsboro Boys’ case stimulated a great change in the way interracial cases are treated. It established that people may not be excluded from juries on the basis of race and that criminal defendants are entitled to effective assistance of counsel. The nine Scottsboro Boys, despite being accused by two white women, were able to break the racial boundary and prompt a permanent change on the way blacks are treated across…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Radio Free Dixie

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Tyson uses Williams life to illustrate his central thesis: how both the Civil Rights Movement and Black Power Movement emerged from the same roots, confronted similar predicaments, and ultimately were fighting for the same thing: justice and freedom for blacks in America. Historians have customarily portrayed the civil rights movement as a nonviolent call on America's conscience juxtaposing he subsequent rise of Black Power as a violent repudiation of the civil rights dream. As Robert Williams's story demonstrates, independent black political action, grassroots organizing, and armed self-reliance all operated in the South in conjunction with legal efforts and nonviolent protest. Tyson’s use of biography allows the readers to better relate to the experiences of Robert Williams therefore emphasizing the parallels and common threads between the two movements. For example, it could just has easily been Dr. King, as a young boy that happened to witness that elderly black woman being beaten by a racist police officer; and the likelihood that any black person could have witnessed a similar event during that time period, unfortunately is quite likely. With the scene that Tyson created, it becomes instantly relatable and of course it would seem only rational to retaliate; the…

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    O.J. Simpson’s trial is often characterized as “the trial of the century”. The trial culminated in a non guilty verdict that instituted a title for Simpson as, “one of the most famous criminal defendants in American History”. (Tru T.V.) The battle between 11 defense lawyers and 25 prosecutors lasted a record breaking 9 months. The entire process, from investigation to the verdict, developed into the greatest “soap opera to fascinate the American public in the 20th century.” (Tru T.V.) The trial broached an opportunity for the lower class to find retribution for the Rodney King beating, and all the social hardships enacted by the stigmatized LAPD.…

    • 3211 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nathan Leopold and Richard Loeb stand guilty of the motiveless and random murder of fourteen year-old Bobby Franks in August of 1924. Intellectual and wealthy, the criminals stand to gain nothing from the senseless slaughter, yet commit the act nonetheless. Neither boy denies the killing, as their defense attorney Clarence Darrow pleads guilty on their behalf. Yet despite guilt, the trial continues, as Darrow fights the proposal of capital punishment for the two boys. Throughout his entire career, not one of Darrow’s clients ever receives the death penalty (Safire 370). Darrow’s tendency to defend the admitted guilty, often pro bono, permits for an interesting form of speech to come to light, as his pleas bear a sense of nobility for they…

    • 2234 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dance Me Outside

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Clearly, this murder was not treated with equal justice because the murderer, Clarence, a white man only spent a small amount of time in prison and returned to the reservation without restorative justice working. He came back a hero to his white friends and acted as if he were superior to the Native Americans because he only got a small sentence for the murder.…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the sole dissent of the Plessey v. Ferguson case, Justice Harlan proclaimed that “[o]ur Constitution in color-blind and neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens” (Linder, 2016). Yet trials in America have long included conversations about race, such as with the infamous O. J. Simpson trial. Legal distinctions based on race are also frequently made, such as is done when considering college admission. These conversations and distinctions are allowed because in reality, neither the Constitution nor the American justice system are truly color-blind. Nor should they be; a color-conscious Constitution and justice system allow America an attempt to make up for past sins, such as the ruling of Plessey v. Ferguson.…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Furman V Georgia

    • 1056 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the furman v Georgia case discrimination played a large role in the verdict of Mr. Henry Furman. But before I get into that let me tell you a little something about the background of Henry Furman. Furman was a 26 year old African- American man who was mentally ill, poor, and a felon in the eyes of the Court. One night while a man name Micke William jr. and his wife and 5 children were asleep, Furman took it upon himself to break in their house and scrummage through their things hoping to find something to with him. To Furmans surprise Williams heard him in his kitchen and once Furman was recognized by William, Fuman charged towards the door in hopes of getting away, as we worked his way out the door Furman dropped the hand gun he was carrying, it triggered and shot right through William’s chest killing him on the spot. After this incident Furman was ordered by the judge to first seek treatment at the local hospital where he was diagnosed psychotic and later tried in court for robbery, 2nd degree murder, and sentenced to the death penalty.…

    • 1056 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Scottsboro Trial

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Scottsboro boys were all accused of raping two white women when they actually were just riding a freight train. They had one of the best criminal lawyers at that time period, but didn’t win the tedious case. The boys and lawyers fought hard to win, but there were many barriers in the way. The barriers included a bias based on their skin color and their handicapped appearance. When the boys were put to trial, the world was in a state of extreme racial turmoil. Many were for racism; however, many were opposed to the idea. Everyone on the case was narrow-minded, which was very unfortunate for the boys. The fact that the boys were Negroes gave them a disadvantage at actually winning the case. That was very unfair because regardless of their color, they were still innocent. Also, the 12 jurors from the case, which included everyday people, were all white. Equally important, the Scottsboro boys had gone against an all-white jury in the trial, which was a violation of their right of equal protection under law. On the other hand, the boys didn’t have a great physical appearance. For instance, one of the boys, Willie Robeson had suffered from syphilis and Olin Montgomery was nearly blind. Their outer appearance was used as an excuse in court, that they “looked” like rapists. That was also a detriment towards the defense. Even though, the boys had Leibowitz, one of the best lawyers at the time, they lost the case. All…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The shameful history of the United States is a burden that is currently affecting everything from education to legal policy. Racial segregation has taken a toll on society and the lives of many minorities. The American judicial system lacks the understanding of human potential by targeting low income minorities and subjugating them for petty misdemeanors. Due to racial discrimination, false allegations towards minorities have resulted in wrongfully incarcerated people for petty crimes; more than likely, they will serve longer sentences for these offenses than a Caucasian person would. Without the necessary resources provided, lack of social capital can inflict damage to their reputation and the overall racial perception society has on minorities.…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Emmett Till was a fourteen year old african american who was beaten to death for flirting with a white women. Milam and Bryant were accused of murdering him, but were found innocent. It was all white jury and during this time period if you were black and committed a crime of any sort you were at fault and it didn’t matter who you were up against. After Bryant was found innocent, he made a statement that admitted to killing Emmett. “It became clear that the injuries were too extensive for Till to survive, so they decided to put him in the Tallahatchie River.” This also proves how flawed our justice…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the movie A Time To Kill, many rights & freedoms were violated according to the Canadian Charter of Rights & Freedoms. In this paragraph, three very big & important rights and/or freedoms will be discussed. The first is section 2 (Fundamental Freedoms), part c. The freedom of peaceful assembly was violated seven times in the movie; the most prominent is when the KKK formed outside the courthouse & demanded that Carl Lee be pronounced guilty or else they’re going to get violent, that is in direct violation of that freedom. Section 2, part d (freedom of association) was also violated as the KKK clearly violated that freedom by fundamentally being in existence because the purpose of their association is to hurt or kill anyone who lives in the United States of America and is not Caucasian and does not follow Christianity or Catholism. The second violation is Section 15 (Equality Rights) subsection 1. This right provides equality before and under the law and equal protection and benefit of the law. Before & during the trial, Carl Lee was held in a segregated prison cell, which isn’t so bad but still racist, the next unfair treatment to Carl Lee was being put on trial in front of a bias and all white jury. When Carl Lee’s lawyer requested that the venue of the trial be changed due to the fact that the jury is all-white and bias, he hoped it be changed to a venue where the jury will be maybe fifty percent black. The judge, who is white, denied that request quite blatantly and anyways started the trial in Canton with a bias jury, which later on in the movie proved to extremely racist in their reasoning for Carl Lee being guilty. The third and last of many other rights & freedoms that have been violated in this movie is, section 13 (treatment or punishment). Everyone has the right not to be subjected to any cruel and unusual treatment or punishment. This right…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lesra Martin was inspired by Rubin Carter’s story, he wrote Rubin a letter saying how much it inspired him and also explained his story, even went to visit Rubin in jail. Lesra and his Canadian family found new evidence that can prove that Rubin “Hurricane” Carter is an innocent man. Lesra and the Canadians tried to get Rubin a trial date to present the new evidence, but each time was denied.…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays