Fahrenheit 451 is a book that talks about ingorance/knowledge and censorship. I will be telling you about what I think about ingorance/knowledge. I will use the pages 9 and pgs 56-57 to point out some examples of ingorance/knowledge. I will also have my own opinion about the topic with my own examples of ingorance/knowledge.…
The Fahrenheit 451 symbol I created is an atomic bomb with the tail of a book. This represents Montag because he spread knowledge and the importance of books to the society and it ended with the fall of the city. He knew the power of books and people hated him for it. The background is perfect blue skies with clouds because it shows how shielded from the truth people were in the society by the government. they don't even know anything about neighboring cities. “And across the world, thought Montag, how many other cities dead? And here in our country, how many? A hundred, a thousand?” (155) Everyone thought everything was okay and just another war until suddenly the bomb came and decimated everything around them and the intellectuals and montage…
Halloway is preparing to shoot the witch and uses his smile (a symbol of happiness) as a weapon. Charles recognizes that the carnival monsters and Mr Dark see happiness as a threat, and so he uses this fear against them by putting a smile on the bullet. Secondly, Charles’ battle against the carnival manifests when he kills Mr Dark. At one point, Charles meets a younger version of Mr Dark, altered by the merry-go-round, who calls himself Jed. Later on, he discovers Jed’s true identity and attempts to kill him.…
Montag grasps that burning books was wrong and tries to fix it because,” maybe the books can get us half out of the cave. This might stop us from making the same damn mistake.” Montag view on book is that if they weren't illegal then it would help people stay out of trouble, and it would help better our society. Another way he tries to correct himself is by going across the river and trying to meet with the book lovers to try to fix thing. Even though Faber warns him that he won’t be able to,” ask for guarantees. And don’t look to be saved in any one thing, person machine, or library. Do your own bit of saving and if you drown at least die knowing you were heading for shore.” Even though Faber warned Montag about the risk he was putting himself if he went across the river. Montag still went ahead with his plan know he had 50/50 percent of surviving. This show he really wanted to make things right and was willing to do everything in his power to do so.…
Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 has been highly regarded and analyzed by a variety of critics through its monumental plot, haunting language, and frighteningly relevant themes. The dystopian backdrop and themes of the novel are deeply connected to the environment of which the novel was written and the events that transpired throughout Bradbury’s life fuelled his artistic response to the McCarthyism era. Through deep analyzation of Bradbury’s life, Garyn G. Roberts concludes that, “Fahrenheit 451 is the result of the keen observations and personal experiences of its author; it is also a cultural artifact, which reflects who we were, who we are, and who we might become” (36). Bradbury has indeed developed a strong connection to books at a very early stage in his life and this has been presented in his own storytelling of the types of book he writes. Bradbury’s life can also be said to be an antithesis to Montag’s world since the presence and feelings associated with literature contrasts very well in their respective realms. Furthermore, Bradbury encourages his audience to examine the culture of which society is evolving towards throughout time in order to understand the functions and needs of human relationships. To support this analyzation, Andrea Krafft…
As time passes, evolution has been observed to occur in nature. This idea does not onl live in nature though. Ray Bradbury does an incredible job of capturing change in technology and how it is thought to be a source of happiness. In the story, Bradbury implicitly reveals the teme that distractions are often confused with happiness. Bradbury does this by presenting Montag with ideas and actions from other characters which eventually impact the decisions of Montag.…
Most people today think nothing of knowledge and take it for granted because they think it is easy to gain. In fact, many young adults tend to resist gaining knowledge and would rather entertain themselves with games, television or partying. However, authors Ray Bradbury and Stephen Vincent Benet would pity their indifference. In science fiction story, Fahrenheit 451, Bradbury tells the story of Guy Montag whose search for meaning and knowledge leads him to make difficult decisions throughout his journey. In “By the Waters of Babylon” a science fiction story, a boy, John, discovers the truth while on a journey to become a man. Both stories teach an important lesson about gaining knowledge, that it cannot be gained passively-it requires sacrifice.…
In my opinion, the ending of the book, Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury, blew the reader’s mind. The ending section Burning Bright, had so much detail and explained how the characters changed in the last few moments in the book, it was a very effective way to end this book.…
Curiosity is the forerunner of discovery(Richard Duke). Since Montag was curious he discovered books an illegal pastime in their society. By doing this Montag develop a sort of addiction and forcing to sacrifice basically everything he knew and loved, he now had to put his trust in the books he knew so little about. Curiosity allowed Montag learn about how messed up his society was and realize that the government is wrong.…
When I finished reading this book, I realized that it was nothing like I assumed it would be. To summarize it into one word, I would say it was fascinating. Now many might wonder, why would I use the word fascinating? When you think about the society that Montag lives in, obviously it seems a little extreme to us but is it really so farfetched? The author came up with the idea of this book because there was once a time that book burning was happening more frequently in America. The title of the book, Fahrenheit 451, refers to the temperature at which books ignite, which I did not realize before reading the book. “Burning books—and in the past, their authors as well—that espouse hated ideas is perhaps the oldest form of censorship” (2).…
Montag’s traits shows effort into helping others but majority of his personality comes out as cruel and selfish, making him a bad character. Guy Montag has influenced Faber “I feel alive for the first time in years.” (pg. 131) Faber wasn’t true to himself for years and finally felt some joy. As well as Clarisse when she said “social to me means talking to you about things like this. (pg. 29) Clarisse, so queer compared to the other did not have many people to be “social” with. Regardless, this character is quick tempered and does not stop to think before he acts. He lacks in self-control and without control leads to disasters. “Montag was gone and back in a moment with a book in his hand.” (pg. 97) Montag allowed the words of Mildred’s friends…
Two hundred and seventy votes to win the president of the united states. The nation’s most protected person. The electoral college has the power to vote one of two candidates the president. The electoral college has overpowered the popular vote of the people in many cases. The electoral college should not be abolished for the main reason that the people who have the position to cast one of the votes know what's best for our country.…
Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury is a book that should be taught in a high school student’s education because of the warnings and important messages it displays. In my opinion, the most important message in the book has to do with the misuse of technology. Bradbury even says himself that technology can be useful in some ways, but that it can’t and shouldn’t replace human connection and interaction. He uses the example of TV’s on all four walls to get his point across that people are paying more attention to TV, rather than actual people speaking to them. This repeatedly happens with Mildred throughout the book and it helps flip a switch in Montag’s head. He finally realizes that’s not how human interaction is supposed to work. It propels…
So he contacted an old man he met awhile ago that he suspected of storing books in his house which would be illegal. The old man ended up being a retired English professor named Faber who gave his three things that are missing in their society. The first reason he gave to Montag he stated books “...show the pores in the face of life”, and that statement shows that people don’t like literature because shows the bad qualities of humans (Bradbury 83). The second reason is that people can be convinced of something because they don’t have the “leisure to digest it”, or time to think of something deeply so they believe the first thing that is said is true (Bradbury 85). The last reason was “the right to carry out actions based on what we learn from the interaction of the first two” (Bradbury 85). All of these missing things can make people believe the world is a perfect place and everyone is happy. Life needs imperfection, and if we think we know everything we would believe everything is just…
Faber says to Montag, “So now do you see why books are hated and feared? They show the pores in the face of life. The comfortable people want only wax moon faces, poreless, hairless, expressionless” (Bradbury 85). His description of books helps to show Montag that books truly do have meaning behind them and can reveal the reality of human imperfections. Faber encourages Montag’s growing interest in books to continue by agreeing to help him get copies made of his book. They also agree to keep continuous communication between the two of them from then on with an ear…