Preview

The Role Of Leninism In Imperial Russia

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1395 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Role Of Leninism In Imperial Russia
The revolutions that occurred in Imperial Russia happened in February (old style, or Julian calendar) or March (new style, or Gregorian calendar) Revolution and The October (old style) or November (new style) Revolution. The February phase begun on March 8, 1917 when what initially began as bread and food riots (a common popular response to the sacrifices and privations exacted from the majority of the Russian population) in Saint Petersburg soon escalated into more organized resistance and rebellion as workers, peasants, and soldiers/sailors organized themselves into councils, or Soviets, through which each constituency pushed their own interests and also coordinated with the others. The soviets, along with the largely discontented bourgeoisie …show more content…
Although he was fully aware of the obvious limitations imposed by Russia's economic and industrial backwardness, he nevertheless aggressively propounded Russia's revolutionary potential, particularly in the international arena. Yes, with only 18% of its population qualifying as industrial workers in the Classical Marxist sense, another 10% as an educated urban-secular bourgeoisie, and the remaining 72% as rural muzhiki (peasants) at the eve of the 1917 Revolution, Russia obviously did not fit the Classical Marxist model internally speaking. As such, Russia lacked what Marxists saw as the key active agent to bring about socialist revolution, an advanced, class-conscious industrial proletariat, such as was increasingly abundant in the industrially advanced countries of Europe and North America. But recall that Russia was an anomaly straddling the twilight between internally underdeveloped "third world" country and a global …show more content…
Their disagreement had one common root: Russia's economic, technological, and social backwardness. For Trotsky, these problems, while internal to Russia, were only resolvable by Soviet Russia's spreading of socialist revolution to other countries, most especially to the advanced industrial capitalist countries for the reasons we already saw in analyzing Lenin's international line. Trotsky believed that unless the leading imperialist countries underwent socialist revolution, Russia's own socialist development was eventually doomed because socialist Russia would always be encircled by powerful capitalist/imperialist enemies. He therefore promulgated the line called Permanent Revolution. As noted earlier, in 1918-1919, these notions were not too farfetched, not only in regards to Germany, but also in other European countries like Hungary (a key fact in political science is that countries which experience major military defeats, such as Hungary and Germany, are very susceptible to internal upheaval and even revolution in the immediate aftermath). Indeed, it was with this in mind that in 1919, The Comintern (or the Third Communist International) was founded in Moscow as an umbrella organization to help promote Soviet-style revolutions in other countries. But again, the abortion of revolutionary prospects in Germany, and the destruction of the short-lived Bela Kun

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    There was a rather significant continuity between Lenin and Stalin’s policies on Political Control. When the Bolsheviks first came in to power Lenin banned Liberal parties who where seen as a threat and later banned all parties including the Social Revolutionaries’ (SR’s) who shared similar views to the Communist party. After the SR’s had beaten them in the elections for the constituency assembly Lenin dismissed these elections and closed down the seemly as well as banning the political parties. USSR was now a one party state with secret police (CHEKA) to eliminate any opposition. Stalin simply kept it this way. Stalin also had secret police (NKVD), Before 1924 Lenin and his ’Red terror’ had been successful in eliminating all opposition outside of the communist party and faced none within the party. However, due to Stalin’s controversial takeover he faced heavy opposition. To keep this opposition repressed Stalin carried out a series of purges. To purge the Party meant, expelling members who, in one way or another, were unreliable. The purge of the Party spread, it came to involve more than just the Party. In 1937 it spread to the arm forces and then quickly came to effect the ordinary people. By 1938 virtually the entire population was living in a state of terror. Stalin’s Great terror led to no opposition and USSR was complete in Stalin’s control. This is where Lenin and Stalin differ because under Lenin there had been free fierce and passionate…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    By 1917 most Russians had lost faith in the leadership of Tsar Nicholas II. The first part of the Russian Revolution of 1917 was Russia's terrible involvement in World War I (1914-1918). Militarily, imperial Russia was no match for industrialized Germany, and the Russian death toll was greater than those sustained by any nation in any previous war. ("History.com"). The February Revolution started March 8, 1917 when rioters rioted for bread took to the streets in the Russian capital of Saint Petersburg. Troops were sent to Saint Petersburg to stop the riots; they opened fire and killed the people. In response to the way the riots were being handled Tsar Nicholas II gave up the throne on March 15. The October Revolution or Bolshevik Revolution was led by Vladimir Lenin who launched a nearly bloodless battle against the ad hoc government ("History."). The Bolsheviks and their allies occupied government buildings and other strategic locations in Saint Petersburg, and soon formed a new government with Lenin as its head; he became the virtual dictator of the first Marxist state in the world.…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The different beliefs in the revolution, this was a big part in the struggle as they all had different beliefs on how Russia would revolt and go into a new stage for Russia. Trotsky had his belief, this was of world revolution. Meaning that Trotsky didn’t believe that Russia could have a revolution on its own, as no socialist society could survive on its own. He didn’t believe that Russia had the economic resources or technological sophistication to complete the transition to socialism on its own. This meant that Trotsky relied on Western Europe and that they would have a revolution, he believed that the communist regimes in western…

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Russia was torn between the world war and the population was threatened as levels of starvation rose whilst industry fell. The provisional government could not do much to stop Russia plummeting as they did not have much power and the people of Russia failed to support them (1). The citizens of Russia were desperately looking for help and the Bolshevik party, created with the help of Lenin and Trotsky in the year 1917, had the answer. Slowly, they had managed to become one of the most powerful parties ever created, but many factors were to cause the consolidation of power. In this essay I will be comparing the significance of Vladimir Lenin in the Bolshevik consolidation of power with another important factor; Leon Trotsky.…

    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the tsar reign, the lower class people worked for little payment and had bad works rights. In 1917, the working class people revolted against the government of Nicholas II led by Lenin, which started the Russian Revolution. It was also called February Revolution and is characterized by the Czarist government collapse and the establishment of a provisional…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite the poor working conditions and the inequality that industrialization under capitalism creates (“The Industrial Revolution and Economic Growth”, 529) it is still a necessary step for Russia because it lays the groundwork for a successful socialist and eventually communist system of government that will allow all members of Russia to flourish. “[The Communist] openly declare that their ends can be attained only by the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions;”(Carl Marks and Friedrich Engel, The Communist Manifesto) Therefore it is important to note that capitalism is an impractical form of government that should not be implemented for any long term scenario it is merely a stepping stone that is unfortunate but essential to the development of a successful government. Then why must Russia endure capitalism? Why not skip straight to communism? It is for this reason, A does not equal C meaning that each step in the process is essential to getting the end result.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 1800 and 1939 Russia underwent through a severe regime change. The people of Russia were in a state of great economic disparity, and the lower class faced hunger, poverty, etc. The lower class had very little of the grain, land, and fiscal control that was available in Russia, such pretext of large income disparity gaps and unbalanced control of GDP were the pre-requisites se in place for the takeover of socialism. And such is what happened. Within this time period Russia went through a proletariat revolution of communism aiming have the workers of the world unite and free themselves from capitalist oppression to create a world run by and for the working class. However even though they underwent this major social-economic change, conditions in Russia stayed around the same. We still saw that Russia was under leadership of a Totalitarian authority. And maintained the same economic conditions where the consumer-based market never developed and the population was largely rural and the economy was agricultural based.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lenin a Red Tsar?

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Lenin went on to say that based on the disproportion between economic development of the monopoly stage, which is the beginning of full socialism, and capitalism, which is the meaning of a private life and freedom from others. The only problem with that theory is that a Monopoly and Capitalism are complete opposites of each other, and were bound to cause problems. Lenin knew of this problem, but considered it a stepping stone in the right direction. He predicted problems, but thought in due time his economic machine would operate with great success, and make Russia into a world mega power. Lenin’s plan of communism for Russia was supposed to be great. People were supposed to get free education, free medical care, everybody makes the same amount of money, working equally as hard, and everybody was supposed to get the same advantage in life.…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Lenin’s uprising and background introduced him to a revolutionary nature and the ideas of Marxism, which…

    • 2484 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Russia modernized extremely late, relative to other European countries, and this mid-modernizing period played a large role in the lead up the revolution. Up until then, Russia was still stuck in the social constructs set up in medieval times, such as the hierarchy triangle, in which the Royals were most important, then the Clergy, then the Army, then the Capitalists and finally the working class and peasants. Because of this system, the peasants were the lowest of the low, and although they made up the largest percentage of the population, they had the least rights and had no way of getting out of their social position. They felt the continual onslaught of political, social and economic grievances from the government, for example, up until the early 1880’s, they were not allowed to own land, and even when Tsar Alexander - Nicholas’ father - emancipated them and allowed them to own their own land, they were constantly crippled by taxes of crops and money. These poor living conditions were only magnified when peasants heard stories of the emancipation in other countries in Europe, which eventually resulted in a cry for peasant rights that was not answered fully until the revolution.…

    • 1626 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Life was hard for the poor in Russia during the revolution they worked very hard for very little pay. The Russian revolution involved the collapse of an empire under tsar Nicholas II the rise of Maxian Socialisim under Lenin and his Bolsheviks. Lenin promised everyone in Russia peace, land, and bread. A little while the Bolsheviks seized power and took Lenin's position.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is easier to quantify a historical figure’s achievements not by showing what he changed, but rather by showing what the world would be like if he had not been there. If Vladimir Lenin had not been born, there would be no Cold War, no Soviet Union and Russia might still be ruled by a Tsar. However, Lenin was not simply a catalyst in the many changes Russia faced; he was a most volatile reactant in the chemistry of Russian and world politics. Breaking the barrier between attaining both economic success and political achievement, Vladimir Lenin almost singlehandedly ended the Tsardom and brought the socialist “Bolshevik” party to power in Russia. Lenin’s unique experiences in his youth led him to his status as a revolutionary and ultimately changed Russia and the world. Lenin’s early life helped to shape his destiny as a revolutionary leader.…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Enduring Legacy and Impact of Vladimir Lenin The reign of Communism throughout the majority of the Eastern World and its origins in industrialism are ubiquitous features of the 19th and 20th centuries. Thus, the pivotal players in its creation, dissemination and thought are of paramount historical importance insofar as they have played a vital role in the establishment, proliferation and dissemination of one of the predominant ideologies of the last two centuries; for better or for worse. And of these pivotal players, Vladimir Lenin stands out in his preeminence. For Vladimir Lenin established the first nation state with the explicitly-stated goal of achieving a Communist society; despite the immense adversity placed in his way, fundamentally…

    • 1627 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Commanding Heights Essay

    • 7534 Words
    • 31 Pages

    Lenin’s hardcore Communist policies were a disaster in the USSR: Food production and industrial output virtually collapsed and the county started falling apart. He had to abandon the most extreme Communist practices early on because they just didn’t work in real life.…

    • 7534 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russia from 1850 to 1917 was littered with numerous political views that ranged across the whole political spectrum. The vast bulk of Russians in the 19th century were extremely poor; a few were extremely rich. The educated middle class were small in number and invariably outside of politics. Though small in number, the middle class did have one great advantage – it was an educated class and many in the middle class saw that Russia could not carry on as it was before Alexander III. Revolutionaries such as Lenin came from the middle class. It was in fact the middle class that caused most of the changes in Russia's political views. The majority was split into two groups.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays