Preview

The Taxi To The Dark Side Analysis

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1538 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Taxi To The Dark Side Analysis
When we think of the word torture, we often reference the action based movies that we have seen. It is a dark, cruel word, one that provides you with an eerie feeling. Many American civilians have not experienced torture first hand and the topic is somewhat of a taboo in our society, being that we often do not discuss this matter on a regular basis. What exactly is torture? According to the article “How the Law and the UN define torture”, the United States defines torture as the act of inflicting severe pain, whether it is physical or mental, for the purposes of obtaining information (The Telegraph, 2005). In other words, torture is an extreme device sometimes used in between two or more groups who are in conflict., especially in the military, …show more content…
military. The documentary discussed the horrendous, cruel and unjust “interrogation techniques”, that can be also known as torture, used by the U.S. military on Afghani prisoners following the 9/11 attack. The documentary begins with the story of an innocent Afghani Taxi driver, by the name of Dilawar, who was taken by American soldiers to Bagram prison, where five days later he was found dead. The cause of his death found by the medical examiner was brutal torture and abuse due to being strapped to a ceiling, forcing him to stand up for hours at a time and being relentlesy kicked on the legs, which pulpified them. Though very unfortunate, Dilawar was not the only prisoner who suffered such treatment under U.S. custody. Through pictures, interviews, etc, this documentary provides the viewer with the shocking effects that the War on Terrorism and Bush’s administration policy on torture had on the both the United States Military and Afghani prisoners. In the end, the film sheds a negative light on Americans as a …show more content…
Whether or not it was for protection against another attack or for the revengeance is debatable. One justification that is used which McCoy mentions in his article is the “ticking bomb problem”. The ticking bomb problem is the idea that there are other terrorists waiting to bomb more areas, therefore it is necessary to obtain as much information as quickly as possible (McCoy, pg. 207). McCoy argues against this idea stating that it is an excuse for “insecure” political leaders to feel empowered due to the fact that torture is most of the time ineffective and irrational (i.e. some may provide inaccurate information to stop being tortured, etx.) (McCoy, pg. 207). We can see how this argument can be supported through the documentary. In the documentary, during an interview with one of the soldiers who took a part in the unintentional murdering of Dilawar, the man was explaining why the soldiers continuously kicked Dilawar when they had no reason to. He stated that in other words, they liked to hear Dilawar scream “Allah”. This statement verifies that the soldiers felt empowered by kicking this poor, helpless man, being that they were kicking him for only satisfaction rather than to obtain information, which can also be connected to McCoy's argument. Additionally, empowerment in American society can be identified as a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Getting your teeth pulled and fingers snapped for not letting the enemy know where the rest of your brigade is hiding, is a common torture tactic. In most cases you just want the pain to stop, so you give false information. This is why I feel ,no, torture should not be a tactic to retrieve information and should be abolished in this country. In the essay The Torture Myth written by Anne Applebaum, torture is discussed and evaluated by the writer. Applebaum focuses on whether torture is a good vice to gain information from a person and it is insinuated that she does not, based on her arguments in the essay. I too believe torture is not a humane nor moral way to obtain truthful information.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The U.N defines torture as a way people get answers from detainees. The CIA would use harmful techniques to figure out what someone did, and how they did it (“5 Interrogation Methods”). One of the techniques used to get out answers was waterboarding. People are put on the ground or anywhere and they have a towel on their face. The prison guard would pour the water all over the other person's face to imitate drowning (“5 Interrogation Methods”). Having said this, because of the interrogation less people have been attacked and the CIA has found more…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The video, “Ghosts of Abu Gharib”, told the tale of inhumane treatment of Iraqi prisoners by United States military personnel in the early 2000’s. After the events that took place on September 11th, 2001 many individuals felt it was their need to join the army, fight for their country, and aid the war against terror. This was a very unique war because the rules of combat were not clearly stated because there was no straightforward law about treatment of individuals who were part of terror group. There was the Geneva law established in 1949 making torture illegal as an international law; however, it was not stated whether it applied to countries who were not part of making the law and did not enforce. One individual talked about his first day in combat asking about the…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At some point everyone has heard of torture. It could have been in a movie or on the news, but they have heard of it. In this day and age, people would like to have believed it was all behind us in the past. Then 9/11 happened, everyone’s lives were changed with one simple act of cruelty. Before 9/11 hit the U.S. in a wave of pain, panic, and anger, our viewpoints on torture would probably have been less likely that it should be allowed. The decision to torture people who are suspected of being part of terrorist groups has always been decided by the government, for the simple reason that it is required to keep us safe from harm. Some people believe that torture is cruel, unsightly and just inhumane. On the other hand there are people who see it the same way but also believe it could be necessary in extreme circumstances. We’re going to look at two different points of torture: When it is acceptable and when it is not acceptable.…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charles parker was a brilliant jazz musician. He was so innovative and played with such genius that he has influenced all jazz musicians regardless of their time period. One can only speculate what might have happened with Jazz if Charles' life was not cut short due to intense drug use as was so common in the musician scene. Then again one can only speculate weather or not Charles' Jazz would have been as great as it was if it were not for the drugs that he consumed on a daily basis. Did the drugs make Charles' Jazz what it was or did the man have the built in ability to squeeze the perfect notes out of a saxophone making it do his will without hardly having to give it a thought.…

    • 3532 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The United States has always prided itself on being a country of freedom. A country with liberty and justice for all. How can we as a nation still pride ourselves on these virtues when we subject people to torture? Where does the line get drawn when we allow torture to be used? We look at the Constitutional rights and the Geneva Convention, as having rules which clearly frown upon the use of torture. However under the Patriot Act we have seen the use of powers under this act to allow the use of torture which contradict the Constitution and the Geneva Convention, which were intended to stop the use of torture, and this become an issue. Do we terminate the use of torture, or do we continue to use the cruel, inhumane, and degrading acts on captivated ‘terrorists’?…

    • 1840 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Truth About Torture, Charles Krauthammer writes, “Torture is not always impermissible. However rare the cases, there are circumstances in which, by any rational moral calculus, torture not only would be permissible but would be required (to acquire life-saving information).” (309) Krauthammer discusses two scenarios where he believes torture should be permitted: “the ticking time bomb and the slower-fuse high level- terrorist”. (313) The ticking time bomb is a situation where hundreds, if not thousands, of innocent lives are at stake, with little to no time, all dependent on a crucial piece of information that can help mitigate the situation. The slower-fuse high level terrorist is when a person who is second-in-command of a terrorist cell is captured and has vital information that can bring down an entire enemy’s organization with one swift blow. In both of these scenarios, Krauthammer displays one common…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry Shue begins his article discussing torture with constraints which allows the victim to “surrender” and comply with the demands of the torturer. According to the Constraint of Possible Compliance (CPC), “the victim of torture must have available an act of compliance which, if performed, will end the torture” (Shue 427). With the aim of interrogational torture being to extract information from a person with holding it, this torture appears to satisfy the constraint of possible compliance, since it offers an escape, in the form of providing the information wanted by the torturers, which affords some protection against further assault. In practice there are evidently only a few pure cases of interrogational torture. For the most dominant type of torture that occurs today is considered to be terroristic. Terroristic torture is meant to put fear in not only the victim, but also all those who oppose that government. The victim’s suffering is being used as a means to end over which the victim has no control over.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tragedy In Torture

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Is the intentional pain that an individual experiences justified by the possibility of preserving the lives of many? Torture is the used as a weapon, but in reality does it work? The purpose of this essay is to identify what the motives are for using torture, the effectiveness of torture, and important issues or flaws with the entire process of torture.…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Annotated bibliography

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Very brief summary: The article ‘Using torture is illegal and never justified’ argues against torture by mainly focusing on the fact that the information gained from torture is highly unreliable because the prisoner could be lying to get the torture to stop. Who makes the decisions is also called into question.…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Much help for Torture interrogation of psychological oppressors has risen in the general population gathering, to a great extent in view of the "ticking bomb" situation. I draw from the verifiable record, criminology, authoritative hypothesis, social brain research, and meetings with military experts to visualize an official program of Torture interrogation. The quintessential component of program configuration is a sound causal model relating contribution to yield. Since the September 2001 psychological militant assaults on the United States, much help for Torture interrogation of fear based oppressors has raised in general society discussion, to a great extent in view of the "ticking bomb" situation. National surveys…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arguments Against Torture

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Justifying the needs of implementing various methods of torture is strongly a recommended option to protecting America’s security and American citizens. While the debate of whether the use of torture is valid to protect the United States of America overall, supporters of the argument strongly argue that interrogating terrorists is only useful when various torture methods are involved. During one of the United States of America’s darkest periods in the nation’s history, the terrorists attack of September 11, 2001 rebooted the discussion of how various methods of torture are a justifiable means to not only place vengeance on the terrorists involved in the attacks on America’s soil. In the course of the aftermath of the horrific attacks of September 11, 2001, supporters of using various methods of torture during the interrogation process observed a central argument to prove their case. For example, if America’s security becomes unfortunately at risk of another terrorists attack, the nation could potentially protect Americans by implementing various methods of torture to only not question terrorists’ against their willpower.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Torturing Prisons

    • 1727 Words
    • 7 Pages

    "Torturing Prisoners in the War on Terror Is Never Justified."At Issue: How Should the United States Treat Prisoners in the War on Terror?. Lauri S. Friedman. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2005. Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale.…

    • 1727 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Torture Is Waterboarding

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Torture is causing pain and suffering to gain information and confessions. It’s a traditional, historical, well-understood term. Waterboarding is a form of torture in which a bound, gagged prisoner is forced to breathe in water. There are several techniques but all produce the same effects, a physical sensation of drowning and a psychological sensation of panic, fear and loss of control. Calling it anything other than torture is absurd. You wouldn’t call a bank robbery a “cash gathering technique,” even if the president said it was so. There are no such things as “enhanced interrogation methods.” That is the euphemism the Bush administration used in 2002 when they were redefining torture so the president could authorize it. There is never an excuse to torture a person, not even during war. It undermines our cause, endangers our soldiers on the battlefield by encouraging reciprocity, and it breeds more enemies of the United States than coercive interrogation methods will ever allow us to capture.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Torture and Ethics

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages

    For some people, the thought of torturing one person to save the lives of many sounds like the right idea. The problem with torture is the end result is not guaranteed. Under extreme measures people will say whatever it takes to stop the pain. Torturing lowers the moral standards of the people performing the act to the same standards they are fighting against. In the long run this only fuels the enemy 's commitment to their cause and makes them stronger. An enemy combatant who is considering volunteering information will not come forward if he or she thinks there is a possibility of torture on the other side. Although it is true that other countries have already used torture on American people, future prisoners of war may receive even worse treatment if the enemy knows their prisoners are undergoing torture. The use of cruel and unusual punishment during interrogation violates human rights and makes any evidence obtained unusable in a court of law. The government and the criminal justice system must observe and follow the same laws they expect society to follow. Laws apply to everyone equally in…

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays