Preview

The Truth About Physics and Religion

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1269 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Truth About Physics and Religion
The Truth About Physics and Religion

Many people believe that physics and religion are separate entities.
They claim that physics deals only with the objective, material world, while religion deals only with the world of values. It is obvious, from these, and from many other comparisons, that conflicts have arisen between physics and religion. Many are convinced that the two fields completely oppose each other, and are not related in any ways. Many people, who follow a particular religion, feel offended by the claims that physicists have made, while physicists believe that religion has no basis in reality. I will show, however, that these conflicts are founded on a misunderstanding, and that there is no division between physics and religion. I will also prove that the misunderstanding lies in the parables of religion and in the statements made by physicists.
Furthermore, I will show that only physicists can really know the truth of physics, and only religious followers can know the truth of that religion; everyone else has to take it on faith.

Many people believe that physics and religion are entirely separate.
They claim that physics is only concerned with discovering what is true or false, while religion is concerned with what is good or evil. Scientists appear to agree that "physics is the manner in which we argue about the objective side of reality." Religious followers, on the other hand, agree that "religion is the way we express the subjective decisions that help us choose the standards by which we live." Although these definitions seem to be contrasting, an important element remains absent, an element that must first be considered before religion and physics can be compared. Those who think that religion has no basis in reality also believe that there is an "obvious" separation between the two fields. They think that religion is a jumble of false assertions, with no basis in reality. Paul Dirac, a physicist, once said:

The very

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    big bang theory vs relgion

    • 4383 Words
    • 18 Pages

    To clarify what's out there to be investigated, Southall begins the handbook in earnest by defining the terms, since ghosts, spirits and poltergeists are not interchangeable and represent quite different phenomena.Ghosts and apparitions are a kind a recording on the environment - a residual energy that can come from a person, animal or even an inanimate object. We can experience these lingering energies by sight, sound, smell and touch. Spirits are what people most often think of as "ghosts." A spirit is the "actual sentient presence, or soul, of an individual or individuals who have remained in the material world after his or her physical body has died." Southall continues by describing different types of spirits and the reasons they may have stayed behind.…

    • 4383 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Newton's investigations of the Bible and of the early Church Fathers were not huge. In the 1690s, Newton composed various religious tracts managing the strict translation of the Bible. Henry More's confidence in the Universe and dismissal of Cartesian dualism may have influenced Newton's religious thoughts. Isaac Newton was not a Christian. He was a monotheist who put stock in scriptural predictions. Student of history Stephen D. Snobelen says of Newton, "Isaac Newton was a blasphemer. However, he never made an open assertion of his private confidence which the standard would have regarded to a great degree radical. He concealed his confidence so well that researchers are as yet unwinding his own convictions." He composed more on religion than…

    • 227 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The verification principle is a significant concept used by many philosophers in order to determine whether a religious statement is meaningful or not. This was highly influenced by logical positivism: group of 20th century philosophers called the Vienna circle and was then further developed by British philosopher A.J Ayer. Religious language refer to statements such as ‘God exists’ and ‘God loves me’. Whilst these metaphysical claims are often rendered as meaningless by verificationism, one must take into account the strengths and weaknesses.…

    • 989 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To discuss this statement first we must look at the definition of understanding. Religious believers and scientists would probably differ in their definitions and therefore disagree from the beginning. A religious person would perhaps say that understanding the world means knowing how to be a good person, how to live a good life and fulfill God's plan. A scientist would probably disagree, saying that understanding the world is having a wide knowledge and good comprehension of how the world works including theories like evolution and understanding why and how things occur. Another slight problem with this statement is its implication that one cannot be a religious believer and a scientist when in fact there are many religious scientists who seem to have science and religion existing harmoniously in their lives. If we are defining understanding as understanding how to live a good life, then I believe that the Bible and Religious Believers do understand more about the world than Scientists do.…

    • 504 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lyell, C. 1830-1833. Principles of Geology, Being an Attempt to Explain the Former Changes of the Earth 's Surface, by Reference to Causes Now in Operation. 3 vols. John Murray, London.…

    • 14026 Words
    • 57 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Whereas the Religious theory is word of mouth and the Bible, science has facts to prove that it is right.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Science and Religion

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Assess the view that science has replaced religion as the main ideological influence in society today? (33 marks)…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scientific beliefs have a basis of solid evidence and can been proven using the scientific method and through extensive research. But there is no “scientific method” for proving religious beliefs. That is, there is no way one could know that a particular, or any religion is “true” or “false.” That therefore, raises a question, “are religious beliefs true in the same sense that scientific beliefs are true?”…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Big Bang had to occur at exactly the right second. If it didn’t, it cannot exist the way it is today. The reason for that is, if it happened to soon, it would have been too small to form stars, and if it happened to late, everything would have flown away too quickly to create stars and planets. They believe God caused this to happen. Scientific laws such as gravity made the content of the universe to form how it is today. They believe God created gravity, while science cannot explain what created it. Carbon had to bond with other atoms and water molecules in order for life to exist. It could not have happened by mere chance. God is the only one who could have done it.…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Religion and Science

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Religion and Science: The Biblical story of creation: This says that the earth was made in 7 days by God. Some Christians interpret the story of creation literally, this means they believe God made the earth in just 7 days, this goes against many scientific theories including the big bang, and evolution. Here is the biblical story of creation: 1. Light and Dark were separated 2. Sea and Sky 3. Lands, Plants and seeds 4. Sun, moon and stars 5. Fish and Birds 6. Humans and animals 7. God rested on the 7th day The Big Bang theory: This is a theory about how the earth came together, which is now accepted by most people and was made by scientists. It states that a small amount of high density matter at a very high temperature exploded, and formed our earth. Living things then slowly became more and more complicated and less simple, until eventually humans were created. This theory is accepted by some Christians who interpret the creation story as a representation of what really happened, and that God could have caused the Big Bang to happen. Some Christians say that 'one day' in the creation story could have been equal to many thousands of years. The Theory of Evolution: This theory was created by Charles Darwin and explains how simple life forms have become more and more complex over time due to the environment and other factors such as a sudden change to the environment, such as a meteorite or a extreme temperature. Why might some Christians might agree that both science and religion are right in their explanation of how the world began? Some Christians may believe the theory of the big bang is correct in how the origins of the earth came about, this is because they may think that God caused the earth to happen through the big bang, and that the creation story is just a representation of how the earth began. Christian views on animals: Most Christians believe animals should be cared for, as they were made by God and put on the earth…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Albert Einstein once stated that, “Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind.” I took this quote to mean that without each other they would lack in a balanced world. Furthermore, the research topic I will completely focus on is the struggle between Catholic churches and the contraceptives.…

    • 1811 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The focus of this paper is to try and answer the questions “is science compatible with religion?” and “which one is closer to the truth?” I will answer these questions separately of course, and in the order they appear. I would however like to say that this is a topic that has been debated for most of the twentieth century by people who have much more experience in their separate fields than I do. I have read several different articles on this topic and I could not find two that said the same thing, or expressed the same opinions. This is a complicated issue that people have been debating since before I was alive, I don’t think that this issue will be resolved anytime soon either. There are many different opinions on the subject and all I can do in this paper is present mine along with the evidence to support it.…

    • 2521 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Science and religion has an obvious conflict throughout the history of mankind. This conflict arouse a stimulation for some sociological discussions, as the reasons and timings behind such conflicts has been searched. Comparing Max Weber’s and Thomas Gieryn’s understanding of conflicts between science and religion, there are certain differences in terms of analyzing techniques and observation points.…

    • 1484 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Religious Relativity

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Relativism is the theory that truths, values, and norms are different for different people, depending on their cultural, economic, political and religious backgrounds. The theory of religious relativism requires students to tolerate other people’s religious beliefs and practices, at the same time recognizing their own beliefs and practices as just one system in a world of diverse, yet equally legitimate, religious systems. In todays society we see an array of people practicing, preaching, and learning religion. We find people everyday that recognize their own beliefs to be beliefs and nothing more but we also see people who consider their beliefs to be the truth and hold that truth to be the highest. I believe it is entirely possible for us to step outside of our own belief system and to tolerate and understand other people’s religious beliefs. I believe religion teachers exemplify the theory of religious relativism the best. Religion teachers can very well believe in Christianity, Buddhism, or Hinduism but they recognize other religions as well. Religion teachers don’t preach to their students, they merely explain each religion and the background behind it no matter what they themselves believe in. The teachers’ purpose is not to preach to the students. The teacher simply provides an overview of each type of religion in a non-biased way.…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    God, Science Debate

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Wide spread myth that science has always been on a collision course with the belief in God and so therefore, natural science and faith in God are incompatible.…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics