Andrea Friedman presents her argument first by describing McCarthy in physical appearance, reputation, and personality, then also describes events, namely that …show more content…
Louis specializing in gender and sexuality studies. Friedman has been honored with multiple awards and recognitions including, but not limited to, the James M. Holobaugh Award for service to the LGBTQIA community, an honorable mention in the 1995 New York State Historical Association Manuscript Award, and a research grant in Women’s Studies through the Woodrow Wilson Fellowship Foundation. This information about Friedman is readily available to the public on her personal biography page on the Washington University in St. Louis website. This establishes her credibility on her article.
Although some may feel this article is biased, Andrea Friedman’s purpose for writing this article was to analyze the opinions of those during the McCarthy era about sexuality and its involvement in politics. I feel that after analyzing this article and researching Andrea Friedman’s qualifications in gender and sexuality studies, I am able to understand the subject matter more critically. “The Smearing of Joe McCarthy: The Lavender Scare, Gossip, and Cold War Politics” has brought a light to how we see those in politics regarding morals, background, and sexuality as well as how the media morphs that