Preview

The Zodiac Killers: A Documentary Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
663 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Zodiac Killers: A Documentary Analysis
"So, what are you into?" A simple question, right? Wrong. You'd think in the 21st century people would be more open minded to other's interests, but when you have an interest in serial killers like I do it's hard to get a conversation past that simple question. I once when met a boy and he asked the million dollar question. Naturally I said "Well, I really like serial killers." With that he gave me a sideways stare, awkwardly shifted in his chair and refused to make eye contact for more than a second. Eventually he told me he had to go, he and I both knew he didn’t. To think, a complete stranger telling you through body language that he simply couldn’t bare being near you a second longer. Now let's get something straight, when I say I like serial killers it doesn’t mean I have an obsession with John Wayne Gacy, or a shrine for The Zodiac Killer. It does not mean that I see Aileen Wuornos as a role model. It means the way they think interests me like no other. The psychology behind it. How could someone torture and kill another living, breathing human being? What's the difference between …show more content…

However, this situation isn’t just limited to me, in 2014 John Borowski produced a documentary called “Serial Killer Culture” which had a controversial topic of murderabilia and murder art. Borowski once said in an interview with Psychology Today “They are human beings just like all the rest of us, and I feel it is society's responsibility to attempt to understand them and not just execute them so they are out of sight, out of mind. There must be a reason for their existence and I’m attempting to figure that out.” Sadly, people didn’t see it this way. Most people were offended by his film and said it was “idolizing serial killers.” Personally, I didn’t see any of the people interviewed idolize any of the serial killers, or their

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Not much is known about the Zodiac Killer other than general knowledge of the patterns killers and psychopaths seem to follow. The mystery that is The Zodiac Killer continues to befuddle law enforcements, forty years later, as the murders occurred in the 1960’s-70’s. Even the letters that he sent in were coded so well that investigators were unable to discover the important information hidden by taunting symbols and marks. But, it is not impossible to solve this strenuous case, in spite of all the possibilities of suspects and amount of time passed.…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    One man responsible for several individuals being murdered, taunting letters being sent to police, living in constant fear of what this killer would do next: sounds like a plot line to a serial killer movie. To the people of west coast California, however, this was very real. One unidentified individual was on a killing spree and was enjoying it too. This man, known as the Zodiac Killer, was a mystery to the police department, but theories were brought up about possible suspects. Even though some people believe Arthur Leigh Allen was the infamous Zodiac Killer, through eye witness accounts and forensic proof, it can be proven that the Zodiac Killer was actually Earl Van Best, Jr.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Arthur Leigh Allen, a maleficent man with a twisted past that directly leads to the ruthless killer that claimed the lives of many innocent victims. The monster called the “Zodiac” first gained public attention at the murders of young couples, regardless the identity was still concealed from the public. Soon the pattern began to break and the man once hidden in the shadows of these treacherous crimes came in to view as the primary suspect.…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “Ask a psychopath what love is and he’ll go on and on, but he has never felt it himself…If you catch him lying, he’ll just shift gears and go on as though nothing had happened” (Goleman). Ted Bundy was one of the most famous psychopaths in the history of the country (Nordheimer). People say he was the perfect killer- handsome, intelligent, witty, and charming (Boynton 25). Bundy was the complete opposite of what people thought a serial killer looked like, so his victims did not fear him (“Ted Bundy”). Robert Keppel, an expert on serial killers, stated, “He taught us that a serial killer can appear to be absolutely normal, the guy next door (“Serial Killers and Mass Murderers”). At one point he was working for a suicide hotline; a friend once said, “Ted Bundy took lives, he also saved lives” (Thompson). Bundy not only thrived on the attention he received from the police and the media (Editors), but loved the thrill of stalking his victims (U*X*L). Not one person Ted Bundy knew would have guessed he was able to do such horrid things.…

    • 5111 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zodiac Killer Analysis

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 1960 a cartoonist-turned-writer, Robert Graysmith became highly involved in trying to unmask the case of the Zodiac killer and all the murders. He worked for the SanFrancisco Cronicle and spent a good amount of his time trying to decode zodiac messags. Becoming nearly obsessed with the stories and following them all, Graysmith investigated into Arthur Leigh Allen being the Zodiac killer and considered him to be the prime suspect.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Zodiac Serial Killer

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In 1968 through 1969 a serial killer known as The Zodiac committed five murders in the San Francisco, California area. The Zodiac first murder was in 1966 the victims name was Cheri Jo Bates. Bates was killed outside her schools library, when the police arrived they found a man’s watch at the scene. In 1968 The Zodiac struck again this time shooting a teenage couple in Vallejo, California. The victims were David Faraday and Betty Lou Jensen. In 1969 Zodiac attacked another young couple, Mike Mageau and Darlene Ferrin. Mike Mageau survived the attack while Darlene died at the scene. The killer late then wrote a letter to each newspaper describing in detail of the crime he had committed. The killer also wrote a code or cipher, which was later decoded by a high school teacher. On September 1969, the Zodiac killed again. The killer targeted another young couple, rather than shooting the couple the killer stabbed both Bryan Hartnell and Cecilia Shepard. Bryan survived the stabbing however Cecilia died two days later. Both of the survivors provided a sketch of a heavyset white male, in his late twenties or early thirties with short brown hair and thick-rimmed glasses. In October of 1969 the Zodiac killed a taxi cab driver. Two days later he wrote another letter to the newspaper taking credit for the murder.…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ted Bundy Personality

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The inside of a serial killers mind is a very vast world of mixed emotions and the feeling of needing to fill a need. Something in a serial killers past is what typically triggers them to start…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Lovely Bones

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages

    They often see a category of people, such as women or prostitutes, as “unclean”, and see their removal of those beings as improving the world. Or, they think that killing the victim, usually in some sort of a ritualistic manner, redeems the victim their wrongdoings. In that case, the killer is a special being and the victim is “chosen” and should be grateful. They often find the victim’s ingratitude infuriating, though unfortunately foreseeable. Serial killers must continuously kill simply because they are addicted to the feelings they get when they do. They also rationalize every aspect and detail of their behavior so there is no reason in their head as to why they should stop. They know what they’re doing, the consequences of their actions, and how to avoid getting caught. Most serial killers, and psychopaths in general, are “consummate chameleons” who are able to hide their rage and true intentions behind a charismatic, civilized facade called the “mask of sanity” (Newton). Psychopaths are amoral and though they knowing the difference between right and wrong, they do not care and lack feelings of remorse or guilt. They tend to objectify other people and treat them as if they were…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People become serial killers for a reason. The expression “Serial Killers” first presumably originated in 1970 by late FBI Agent Robert Ressler. Before this time society categorized them with Mass Murders. Agent Ressler was lecturing at a college when he heard someone describe the killing as having an unending ‘serial’ cycle. Going back to his childhood, he remembered the movie industry titled “Serial Adventures” which showed short films of Batman and other heroes. None of the shows that were played came to a gratifying close. It always left you wanting more. Ressler came to the conclusion that there should be two separate category’s for mass murders, a single killing of many people at one location, and serial homicide, multiple killings that…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Apparently, all serial killers are murderers, but not all murderers are serial killers according to an article titled "Serial Killers: Nature vs. Nurture." There are major differences between murderers and serial killers and according to this article,“ Serial killers are only driven by instinct and a desire to kill. Due to these sexual desires and the need to fulfill their arousing fantasies it often urges these individuals to murder those who are complete strangers. Therein lays the fundamental difference.” Now, the article discusses the fact that typically a serial killer’s profile is that of a white male between the ages of 20 and 30 who commonly target their victims within the area of their living space. Note that not all serial killers fit this profile and this is apparent through history, as women have been known to develop into serial killers as well. Psychotics and psychopaths can have personalities in common, such as dull emotions, but they tend to diverge regarding whether he/she can mentally stay within reality. Psychopaths are cunning and manipulative, but they do not experience hallucinations nor delusions. They do not hear the voices of strangers in their minds nor do they hold inaccurate theories about the world. However, no matter his/her sex, age, or race a serial killer is a serial killer. Thus, the question remains: Was it nature or what it nurture? Could it be both? It is evident that nurture takes the principal role in the creation of a serial killer. According to Gina, who wrote the article "Nurture Over Nature: Mental Illness and Traumatic Life Events," while nature does play a chief role in their creation and is accountable for a decent part of the process, it does not take it…

    • 1830 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Serial killers are a relatively rare, yet commonly publicized, part of our society. The media portrayal of serial killers skews the opinions and creates a stereotype of murderers for the public. James Knoll, MD states in his article, “Serial Murder: A Forensic Psychiatric Perspective”, that no evidence supports the idea that serial murder is a “growing epidemic” as people believe it is (qtd. in Johnson-Sheehan & Paine, “Writing Today”, pg 332). This misperception of serial killing was exhibited in the way the media portrayed the “Hillside Strangler”, a murderer who was killing women in the Los Angeles area by strangling them and leaving them nude in the hilly areas in 1977. The articles reporting the murders helped to cause fear in citizens by reporting extreme measures being taken by others, using strong language, and stressing the idea of a victim profile, all of which help the media excite or incite fear in the readers, rather than reporting the straight facts.…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Zodiac Killer

    • 150 Words
    • 1 Page

    Many murders are left as a mystery. One of the famous unsolved murder cases was the Zodiac Killer. In the San Francisco Bay area at least five murders were made between 1968 and 1969. He sent letter to newspapers that threatened innocent people and mocked the police. December 20, 1968 was the first incident that started the killing spree. The Zodiac killer shot two young teenagers near their car. Later on July 5, 1969, the killer came back and fired at a young couple. One was killed and the other one was severely injured. The killer usually sent letters to the San Francisco Editor, San Francisco Chronicle and and many other companies. If his letters weren't published on the front, the killer threatened them with attacks. The killer struck a…

    • 150 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Zodiac Killer

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Zodiac was very real villain, and no this villain does not have a giant evil lair or an army of henchmen. What he does have is a psychopathic and insane mind filled with twisted ideas as well as a bit of genius. This villain is the Zodiac Killer one of Americas most infamous serial killers. The Zodiac was active between the 1960's and 1970's, in this time he took 37 victims in total but the the police only counted seven as definite victims. The Zodiac is like a typical cliche horror movie villain but before the cliche, this mysterious criminal was clever and quick. For years he taunted the police and media, what set him apart from the average day to day serial master mind were his letters. He sent a total of eighteen letters throughout his career if you can call it that, to newspapers mostly though some to private citizens. His letters and cryptic messages would always begin with 'Dear Editor this is the Zodiac speaking.' He would demand for the letters to be published threatening to go on murderous rampages if they weren't.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pedro Lopez

    • 2689 Words
    • 11 Pages

    It is within human nature to feel as though one can label a person as good or bad without fully knowing that person. Serial killers are a type of species presumed to be inherently evil and more flawed then the devil himself. This definition of serial killers is widely accepted among different nations because as a whole the people of the world genuinely agree on what is coherently good as well as what is coherently evil. Thanks to universal coverage and bias opinion which is divulged by the media most people have difficulties seeing serial killers in any other light besides the root of all evil. Something not quite understood by people is the lack of morality which is evident in all, not just serial killers. Sadly enough in today's society forgiveness is not something easy to gain and in order for it to be sincere the past must be forgotten, something even more difficult to achieve than equality. Considering that most, if not all, serial killers follow through with their actions based on some form of chemical inequality within their brain; it seems to make no sense as to why the human population would judge them any more than they would judge a person with autism. Modern day views on serial killers have been produced from the world's lack of knowledge within the psychology field from the start. Before people were given the correct information as to why serial killers killed people it was assumed that they were simply horrid people who must be killed. Now more is known about the psychological issues serial killers experience which causes them to pursue certain actions allowing for their reasoning to be somewhat understood by all. Serial killer Pedro López, although, had a different and more disturbed childhood than most serial killers which is thought to have lead to his type of crime. Like most "normal" people Pedro López was unable to forget the past of revise it in any way. The trauma Pedro López faced as a child caused psychological issues upon him, beginning…

    • 2689 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Serial Killers

    • 1314 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Eric Hickey (2012) in “Serial Killers: Defining Serial Murder” defines what a serial killer is exactly. In the article the Hickey describes serial killers are usually sexual attacks and murder of young women, men, and children by a male who follows a patter, physical or psychological. I think that the author made a good definition of a serial killer, even though it is stereotypical to describe a serial killer. Scientists have trouble picking a side in the debate because some serial killers represent one side and the others on the other side. Shirley Scott in (2012) “What makes serial killers tick” gave some examples of some red flags. Statistically, the average serial killer is a white male from a lower-to-middle-class background, usually in his twenties or thirties. Many were physically or emotionally abused by parents. Some were adopted. As children, fledgling serial killers often set fires, torture animals, and wet their beds. These examples of red flags are perfect. People need to know what kind of things they need to look for to keep their kids and themselves safe.…

    • 1314 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays