compound was relatively pure. By determining the melting point range of our final product using a Mel-Temp Apparatus, this also helped us be more confident in our results. Our measured melting point range was 161-163°C, and the known boiling point of triphenylmethanol is 162°C. Since the known value of triphenylmethanol falls within our measured melting point range, we can further conclude that our recovered product was triphenylmethanol. Lastly, our percent yield of triphenylmethanol was calculated to be 30.1%. Were were able to calculate this percentage through dimensional analysis. Since methyl benzoate was the limiting reagent in this particular scenario, we were able to calculate the percentage of the reaction’s efficiency.
compound was relatively pure. By determining the melting point range of our final product using a Mel-Temp Apparatus, this also helped us be more confident in our results. Our measured melting point range was 161-163°C, and the known boiling point of triphenylmethanol is 162°C. Since the known value of triphenylmethanol falls within our measured melting point range, we can further conclude that our recovered product was triphenylmethanol. Lastly, our percent yield of triphenylmethanol was calculated to be 30.1%. Were were able to calculate this percentage through dimensional analysis. Since methyl benzoate was the limiting reagent in this particular scenario, we were able to calculate the percentage of the reaction’s efficiency.