Preview

Thomas Aquinas 'Euclidean Theodicy'

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1124 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Thomas Aquinas 'Euclidean Theodicy'
Having considered what the nature and purpose of Creation is, both its beauty and its corruption, it is necessary to consider what things might be said about God. For how God the Creator and the Creation interact give insight into the question of natural evil. In particular, sheds light on how Divine freedom, and earthly freedom, can interact. How can God be both free and good when suffering exists?
The belief in the goodness of God is both a source of great frustration, and comfort, in regards to the question of natural evil. Defining God as good is a source of pain because it flies in the face of how many people experience the world. The classic Euclidean theodicy operates with three assumptions, one of which must be false: God is all-loving,
…show more content…
Aquinas proposed three different models of how humans can understand things: univocal, equivocal, or analogical. Aquinas dismisses both univocal and equivocal. A univocal approach will put God and humans on the same plane, with the idea that the way God loves and the way a human loves are identical. In sharp contrast, equivocal understanding argues instead there is no overlap, no shared same-ness of being. There are problems with both views. If there is only difference between humanity and God, then what hope can there be to ever understand another, especially if some level of understanding is required for relationships which God seems to desire? Yet, to conflate God and humanity is to confuse boundaries of Creator and creature, placing the same human limitations and confines on God who does not exist within creaturely existence. Thus, both univocal and equivocal understandings of how to speak of God fall short of being helpful or …show more content…
Allowing for the created order’s freedom means allowing for the possibility that freedom will be used to turn away from God: “Every free act, even an act of hating God—arises from and is sustained by a more original love of God”. However, no act of disobedience or no privation of the good is enough to stop God’s plan for humanity. “God can both allow created freedom its scope and yet so constitute the world that nothing can prevent him from bringing about the beatitude of his kingdom”. God’s agency and human agency do not have to be competitive, nor does every act of human agency (or act of natural evil) need be directly attributed to God. Divine will and divine permission are not interchangeable, and by allowing created beings’ freedom God allows for the created world to be in loving, free union with

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In his Summa Theologica number seventeen, article two, Aquinas is trying to answer the question of whether there is falsity in the senses and, if there is, how it exists. He concludes that falsity does exist in the senses in the way that the senses can misjudge objects. Aquinas maintains that the senses can perceive the likeness of an object in one of three ways. The first is by the color of the object and other proper qualities which occur in only one sense. The second is by the common qualities of shape and size which can be validated by more than one of the senses. Finally, the third occurs accidently and not of its own nature. He follows that by stating the premises for his argument. Aquinas’s first premise is the sense gains false knowledge…

    • 218 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    J.L. Mackie’s, “Evil and Omnipotence,” criticizes the debate for the existence of God by arguing that the fundamentals of what a “perfect God” is are inconsistent with one another. The main theological doctrines of what a “perfect God” entails are as followed: God is omnipotent, omnibenevolent, and omniscient. J.L. Mackie rejects this by stating God cannot be omnipotent and omnibenevolent if evil exists. He asserts that the problem of evil proves that either no god exists. Mackie soon reaches the debate question of, “Can a perfect God exist when suffering exists?”…

    • 172 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The proposed solution to be discussed and Mackie’s response to it is the claim that ‘evil is due to human free will’ and as such it cannot be attributed to God. Evil should instead be attributed to the free actions of individuals, the power of which has been endowed upon them by God. While it is acknowledged that there exists evil in the world, as a result of some human free will, it is claimed that freedom of will is a more valuable good than any resultant evil. Through God allowing such freedom, He has satisfied His ‘wholly good’ requirement.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    chp 5 Dr.Beckers book

    • 18144 Words
    • 73 Pages

    After briefly introducing the concept of revelation within Christian theology, this chapter first explores the problem of talking about God in our secular world, particularly about the objections to God-talk, especially from the atheistic position. The chapter then proceeds to discuss what Christian theologians call "the general revelation of God." This type of revelation is based on the natural knowledge of God which is generally or universally available to all human beings. The chapter investigates various objections to such knowledge, most especially those within atheistic critiques of both religion and God. The chapter then describes the principal positions that Christian theologians have taken regarding the possibility of a natural knowledge of God.…

    • 18144 Words
    • 73 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The problem of evil is a significant and enduring philosophical and theological debate. A question is often raised and discussed: if God is both all-loving and all-powerful, then how can evils-including natural evil and moral evil---exist in our world? In response to the charge that the evils of the world are incompatible with God's omnipotence and perfect goodness, the word"theodicy" is coined to deal with the problem of evil. Usually it is an attempt to show that it is possible to affirm the omnipotence of God, the love of God, and the reality of evil without contradiction. Two of the most well-known and most frequently discussed theodicies are the Augustinian theodicy and the Irenaean theodicy.…

    • 1488 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The question of whether there is a God has been debated by many philosophers, religious experts, and even your average citizens. Many of those people have attempted to argue why God is or is not real. This paper is going to present two different arguments by the philosophers: Robin Collins and William Rowe. The first argument by Collins is an argument for the existence of God, who designed our incredibly complex universe. The explanation of Collin’s argument will be followed by Rowe’s argument against the existence of God, which is in relation to intense suffering that exists in this world. With those two arguments at hand, the question is, are the conclusions compatible?…

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    A tremendous divide exists between the daily struggles many of us share and the systemic suffering of oppression. The way in which humanity experiences suffering impacts one’s ideas about God, and one’s ideas about God impact how one views suffering. Gustavo Gutiérrez and James H. Evans, Jr. both take on the challenge of examining how to describe and discuss God in a world where many innocent suffer unjustly. While the two theologians align closely in many respects, one particular idea offers substantive disagreement. In On Job, Gutiérrez asserts that in order to provide complete freedom to humanity, God must limit Godself, whereas Evans in We Have Been Believers holds fast that God is not limited in any way.…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    God is often defined by the context of our upbringing. When asked about the benefit of following a religion, my parents replied, “Your soul feels free.” But what does that really mean? Through the context of Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World, that means Community, Identity, and Stability. It is difficult to define god without the guidelines of holy books, such as the Quran, the Bible, and the Torah. By analyzing god throughout history, we can begin to understand who he is and how our lives can improve by placing our faith in him.…

    • 171 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The world created mirrors perfection, with this perfect world came the creation of moral autonomy to all human beings and angels. After evil and suffering entered the world due to the Original Sin, came the Fall of Archangel Lucifer. In consequence, disharmony and chaos was bought in to the world and to living beings due to the absence of good in themselves, which tempted the world, as we are Adam’s ‘limbs’. We are ‘seminally’ present in them so we deserve to be punished in consequence. Augustine stated that ‘All evil is either sin or the punishment for sin’. This explains moral and natural evil, as they are consequences of a Creation that was created by beings who had an absence of good. Both humans and nature malfunctioned. Therefore, God does not need to intervene as he gave beings the capacity of free will and they chose to commit sin and as a consequence there is evil and…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are three primary supporting arguments of Theodicy which cover the ideology of soul-making, free will gifted to mankind and the promise of heavenly bliss. Soul-making has the intention of guiding humans into becoming the most perfect possible version of themselves through the development of good moral qualities and by entering into a personal relationship with god. This however can only be truely be achieved in an environment that Nick Trakakis (n.d) states needs to have “great dangers and risks, as well as the genuine possibility of failure and tragedy, can provide opportunities for the development of virtue and character” as soul-making cannot occur in an environment that only peace and happiness in the presence of god because humankind would then never come to truely appreciate God. Freewill was gifted to mankind by God in order for humans to make meaningful moral decisions in a world in which the consequences of actions are predictable and dependable (Richard E. Cree, 2013, p. 160). This means that god cannot cause or determine the actions of mankind, even if these choices result in morally good or evil outcomes, and that means only humans can be held responsible for their choice and not god.…

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    I am writing on John Hick’s piece entitled There Is a Reason Why God Allows Evil. In the selection Hick explains a theodicy, a justification of God’s goodness because of evil, the soul-making view of life in this defense of God’s way in the face of evil. The dilemma of the problem of evil is, if God is perfectly loving he must wish to abolish evil. If evil exists then God cannot be all perfectly loving. Hick’s theodicy, the soul-making view, states that God intentionally placed this evils on earth so that we can over come temptations. God wants humans to go through these test of our convictions so that they can choose good, and they can ultimately undergo spiritual growth. Hick believes that this is not evil but good, and most cannot see though the belief that the world is supposed to be a paradise.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Today the news is filled with coverage on various natural catastrophes and other related causalities that people face daily. Anyone can look into their lives or even their neighbors and see the presence of misfortune that surrounds our world. This problem has brought up the issue of God’s existence in religious philosophical discussions. For centuries, many have tried to dismiss the existence of God on the basis of the existence of evil. Let’s consider where God has been placed in people’s lives throughout our history. For the Greeks and Romans gods were thought to personify wisdom, war, and other actions that human beings took (Spitzer 5). As knowledge continued to progress god was thought to live in heaven, beyond the realm of the planets. He was believed to have created life thousands of years ago. Soon as human knowledge progressed even further we’ve learned about the Big Bang, DNA, and evolution (Spitzer 14). It seems that the more humans know, the further back God gets pushed. Often, it appears as if humans use God as a placeholder for the unknown, but as we learn more, he gets redefined. Philosophers question whether or not there can be a wholly good God that would create such a world where evil exists. This pursuit is known as the problem of evil. “According to the ‘problem of evil’, the extent of evils in the world seems to conflict with the existence of an omniscient, omnibenevolent, and omnipotent God. Theodicy is a study where theists are able to get together and make their arguments disclosing information on the compatibility between God and evil. This seems to be one of the most perplexing problems theists have to face. In today's…

    • 2572 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Why Does God Allow Evil?

    • 1771 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Many people dispute the true intentions of God, himself, since the beginning of mankind. Opposing and concurring arguments can be just as primitive. Regardless of personal perspective on any indefinite theory, it is undeniable that the controversy between good and evil will inevitably exist. Two dominant philosophers discussed in “The Problem of Evil” are Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz and David Hume. Both of these authors discuss interesting motives from both sides of the issue: why and why not God should allow evil.…

    • 1771 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    History of God

    • 1310 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Throughout narration certain recurring questions have been answered in dissimilar theological and philosophical terms. Perhaps the most debated question has been whether God is to be known by reason, by faith, or by experience. Every clarification has had influential and persuasive…

    • 1310 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    INTRODUCTION In this day and age there are many ideas on what the true nature of God is. Some people see God as the gentleman who presents his plan and allows people to work it out; others see Him as the God who is all about peace, love and happiness and there are those that believe God is their buddy, or the Big Guy upstairs. They have created a God that fits right into their world; they have created a God that is like them. The God of the Bible has been replaced with a God people are comfortable with.…

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays