Preview

Thomas Nagel's Determinism Or Free Will?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
639 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Thomas Nagel's Determinism Or Free Will?
Have you ever wondered what exactly is shaping your path and the decisions you make through your life? What ultimately controls our destiny and the decisions made in each of our lives? Some philosophers believe it’s free will others believe its determinism, but most agree that these two beliefs are incompatible and cannot occur together. I believe that free will and determinism happen together and that’s what makes us feel as if we are choosing to do things freely throughout our lives. Thomas Nagel defined determinism as “the sum total of a person’s experiences, desires, and knowledge, his hereditary constitution, the social circumstances, and the nature of the choice facing him, together with other factors that we may not know about combine to make a particular action in the circumstances inevitable.” This basically states that all events are caused by past events and nothing other than what does transpires could transpire. For example, you decide to have cheerios for breakfast. You almost pulled bacon and eggs out of the fridge to prepare that, but changed your mind to cheerios. You think you changed your mind, but according to determinism your choice was already made to have cheerios. Maybe it was that you have high cholesterol or you were running late to work, whatever reason it may be you were never going to have bacon and eggs because that wasn’t really your choice to make in the first place. Free will takes the approach on the opposite spectrum in that everything that happens in life is your decision. …show more content…
W.T Stace stated that the problem that often arises with this argument is “incorrectly defining free will as some sort of indeterminism.” Free will should instead be thought of as acts that are caused by the mental state of the person, acts not freely done should be thought of as acts that were caused by conditions to not related to that

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many historians have argued the political and cultural differences between the New England, the Middle, and the Southern Colonies were economically motivated rather than ideologically motivated.The New England colonies were formed mainly for religious and political freedom. Like the New England colonies, the Middle Colonies were more ideologically motivated than economically motivated since the people there were looking for toleration. In the southern colonies, unlike the New England and the Middle colonies, they were economically motivated as there were mostly plains with warmer climate and rich fertile which are the perfect conditions to start plantation life.…

    • 96 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The popular article, “Why Street Protests Don’t Work,” is by Moisés Naím, a contributing editor for The Atlantic, an author of more than 10 books, and a distinguished fellow in the International Economics Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Throughout this article, Naím argues that protests are no longer productive with the popularization of street marches. By explaining how social media has undermined real activism and productive, organized protesting, Naím’s piece is subjectively denouncing social media’s affect on social movements and demonstrations. Naím’s aim is to inform the public about the importance of organized and committed movements rather than the popular movement of clicking to share without sustained action…

    • 141 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the main questions that we face is whether or not, we as humans have genuine freedom. Are we free to make our own choices? Do we decide what happens in our lives in the future? Or are our lives set pathways in which we have no say at all? Are all our choices already decided? In other words, do we have free will or are our actions pre-determined, or both? Hard determinists, libertarians and soft determinists all set out to provide answers to these questions, holding different views on whether or not free will and determinism are compatible. Both hard determinists and libertarians believe that free will and determinism are incompatible but hard determinists reject the idea of free will whereas libertarians support the idea of free will and reject determinism. On the other hand, soft determinists believe that free will and determinism are in fact compatible.…

    • 2062 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When it comes to determinism and free will, there are two categories which determinists would side with. Either they are a soft or a hard determinist. Determinism is defined as the theory that “everything in the universe..is entirely determined by causal laws, so that whatever happens at any given moment is the effect of some antecedent cause” (Pojman & Fieser, Free Will and Determinism, p. 388). In this essay, I will be reviewing philosopher Baron d'Holbach's arguments against the concept of free will in the perspective of a hard determinist.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A very wise man once says, "God versus Man, Man versus God, God versus Nature, Nature versus God, Man versus Nature, Nature versus Man." These six battles constitute an ultimately greater battle: the battle of free will versus determinism. Free will is the ability for a human being to make decisions as to what life he or she would like to lead and have the freedom to live according to their own means and choose their own destiny.…

    • 1552 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Proponents of this argument conclude therefore that free will is not only compatible with determinism but entails.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines philosophical determinism as “the belief that all events are caused by things that happened before them and that people have no real ability to make choices or control what happens; a theory or doctrine that acts of the will, occurrences in nature, or social or psychological phenomena are causally determined by preceding events or natural laws; a belief in predestination, the quality or state of being determined” (1). Does this mean that whatever action we make is a choice that doesn’t belong to us, but is rather a result of complex events that surround us? Do people have a right to justify some of their actions, and can be excused due to an idea that they do not act voluntarily?…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Determinism is a controversial topic to free will with multiple theories proving and disproving it. As printed in The Collins Cobuild Learner's Dictionary, determinism is defined as “...the belief that all actions and events result from other actions, events, or situations, so people cannot in fact choose what to do.” Meaning, all life choices are predetermined from the minute we are born, to the minute we die. In contrast, “freewill is an individual taking control and responsibility for his/her actions according to his personal will” (Freewill Verses Determinism). People who believe in Free will, accept the idea that life is not predetermined, and they can independently act however they see fit. Free will and determinism can be further simplified and have multiple differences as well as similarities.…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I can most relate with Stace's views on freewill. I feel that the freewill argument is more about definition and the word's true meaning. I also agree with his statement of, "if there is no free will there can be no morality." Stace believes that is doing what we want to do and not being constrained from doing so. Morality is a good argument of why we do what we do. Then there is the idea that we have choices and choices are made by the individual and not by outside influences.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gary Gutting, the author of the article, What Makes Free Will Free? deliberates that we do not have free choice as we assumed which a researcher confirmed. By free choice, this means the conviction that our conduct is dictated by our own unrestrained choice and that we have complete power over our activities. Also, Gary Gutting examined various thoughts on determinism as the researchers suggested. Determinism refers to the conviction that all human conduct or any other occurrences have a cause. This is opposed to a person's will to accomplish an action. Gary Gutting discussed what David Hume, a philosopher, believed and the belief of David Hume is that both determinism and free choice are possible, they are compatible with each…

    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe that free will is true in saying, the idea that humans can freely choose their actions rather than all our lives being predetermined like the way determinist believe. Determinist think free will is just simply an illusion, and that our thoughts come from our background, and we are unaware as to which we strive no conscious control. As Sam Harris philosopher, claims that our thoughts and desires impose instinctive circumstances that define the character of your consciousness in that moment.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Causal Determinist

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the reading, Freedom, Determinism, and Causality, we learned that we have no control over our behaviors because they are made up of our beliefs and desires, which are influenced by our genes and environment. For instance in the reading we are compared to a computer, our behavior is the result of your beliefs and desires just as a computer’s behavior is the result of its programming (Sober). The program within the computer is our genetic code. Then a hard determinist would create this argument, P1) Free choices require that the agent can choose from more than one possible option. P2) Our…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Various philosophers have explained iterations of free will in more depth, resulting in a greater number of issues connected to it. When arguing against free will, the concept of determinism is advanced as the main argument. Determinism is the philosophical idea that every event or state of affairs, including every human decision, and action, is predetermined. The main perceived threats to our freedom of will are various alleged determinisms. These can be physical, psychological, biological or theological in nature. For example, suppose you meet a person you are instantly attracted to. Practically every thought and emotion in your body commands you to approach the person but for various reasons you hold back; the moment doesn't feel right.…

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arguments about free will are mostly semantic arguments about definitions. Most experts who deny free will are arguing against peculiar, unscientific versions of the idea, such as that free will means that causality is not involved. These arguments leave untouched the meaning of free will that most people understand which is consciously making choices about what to do in the absence of external coercion, and accepting responsibility for one’s actions. Hardly anyone denies that people engage in logical reasoning and self-control to make…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Code Of Conduct 2012

    • 192 Words
    • 1 Page

    In the Code of Conduct 2012, certain values and principals have been put in place to help the nurses carry out professional conduct in practice. There are eight principals which have been based on the four underlying values of ethical nursing; respect, trust, partnership and integrity. The fourth principle of the code instructs RNs to ‘Maintain health consumer trust by providing safe and competent care’. In 4.5 of this principle, nurses are strongly advised to ask for advice and assistance from colleagues whenever the care of a patient may be compromised by either a lack of knowledge or skill (NCNZ, 2012). This standard related to Jo because in her situation she lacked knowledge and the right to prescribe. Instead of taking the situation into…

    • 192 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays