Thompson's PCS Model Essay

Thompson’s PCS model is used by Sheldon to counter Bob’s cultural and self-value of wanting Joyce to be admitted to a residential home, as is the common practice in today’s society. This model is predominantly designed to provide intervention for disadvantaged groups in society, which would allow Joyce to participate in decisions regarding her care, as an older person (Braye & Preston-Shoot, 2016). The structure of this model identifies how oppression is embedded in society through institutions which support personal and cultural beliefs, which is absent in Joyce’s case (Siobhan, 2006).However, in assessing Joyce’s situation, Sheldon uses Thompson’s anti-oppressive model by allowing Joyce to participate in her own assessment and in deciding
This law provides the right to self-determination but there exist significant barriers to applying human rights justice, including ageism (Braye & Preston-Shoot, 2016). Again, Joyce’s needs assessment was based on the Care Act 2014, which made it mandatory for social workers to focus assessment on the person’s needs and fully involving the individual and, where appropriate, their carers in the assessment. This was evident in Joyce’s case, as Sheldon clarified Bob’s genuine fears should Joyce be allowed to live at home (Feldon, 2017). However, there was no indication that Sheldon offered Bob (Joyce’s main carer) the opportunity of contributing to the assessment process as laid out in the care Act 2014. Sheldon would have the opportunity to reflect on this during supervision with his manager. Nonetheless, in accordance with the Care Act, Sheldon gave Joyce the right to a personal budget, whereby the service user can name and employ their carer
Sheldon’s explanation to Joyce that she can choose her own carer and also take part in the process of selection in accordance with (BASW) code of ethics, which stipulate that information should be given to service users in order for them to be able to make informed choices ( BASW, 2014). According to the International Federation of Social Work ethical code (IFSW), social workers have to be open to cooperation with other organisations, which is of value to service users (Blennberger, 2006). In following this code, Sheldon, together with Joyce, searched the local authority’s web site and found a local book club which meets every two weeks at the library. Joining this club will enhance Joyce’s social connections and mitigate the risk of