The Title VII of the Civil Rights Act protects individuals against employment discrimination on the bases of color, as well as national origin, sex, religion. This law applies to any employers with 15 or more employees including the local state, government, employment agencies, labor organizations and federal government jobs.…
Did the Title VII section of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (updated in 1991) go far enough and provide adequate protection for the U.S. workforce? For the vast majority of states, the answer is a resounding yes; most states defer to the federal legislation for employment-related discrimination laws. There are, however, a handful of states that have enacted their own versions of Title VII; in doing so, they are effectively saying that no, Title VII does not meet the needs of our state. One state that has enacted its own form of employment discrimination laws is Florida; in 1992, the Florida Legislature passed the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992. Section 760.10 specifically addresses many of the same issues covered by Title VII protections. What is the same, and what is different, between the two Acts? This paper will summarize the two sets of laws, describe the similarities, and detail the distinct differences between Title VI, the federal law, and Section 760.10 of the Florida law.…
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964- Title VII prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex and national origin. The Civil Rights Act of 1991 (Pub. L. 102-166) (CRA) and the Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009 (Pub. L. 111-2) amends several sections of Title VII. In addition, section 102 of the CRA (which is printed elsewhere in this publication) amends the Revised Statutes by adding a new section following section 1977 (42 U.S.C. 1981), to provide for the recovery of compensatory and punitive damages in cases of intentional violations of Title VII, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, and section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (www.twc.state.tx.us, 2015).…
Throughout the United States history, there has been a large amount of discrimination in the workplace and no laws to protect employees. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex and national origin. If an employee feels they have been a victim of employment discrimination they can file a charge or claim with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) (Contributors, 2014). EEOC strives to protect employees that are not treated fairly by other employees or companies. After a complaint has been filed with EEOC, they will handle all the claims by following common procedures and follow all rules and regulations to ensure all cases are handled the same.…
1. What is one aspect of Title VII that has been violated by the company?…
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 unequivocally states that it is “unlawful employment practice for an employer...to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin” (“Title VII”). In 1984, the limits and lengths of this statutory provision were put to the test as Price Waterhouse employee Ann Hopkins filed suit against her company for discrimination in violation of Title VII. Hopkins, denied a partnership position through what she considered to be a discriminatory evaluation system, argued that her alleged lack of interpersonal skills served to her detriment solely because she was a woman.…
Goldman, Tom. "40 Years On, Title IX Still Shapes Female Athletes." NPR. NPR, 22 June 2012. Web. 19 Nov. 2012. .…
According to "Aauw" (2012), “Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a federal law that prohibits discrimination in employment on the basis of sex, race, color, national origin, and religion. It applies to employers with 15 or more employees, including federal, state, and local governments. Title VII also applies to private and public colleges and universities, employment agencies, and labor organizations”.…
Employment discrimination occurs when an employee is rebuked based on factors that have no bearing on job performance. Traits such as race, religion, gender, and national origin are all elements that can be the basis of discrimination in hiring, firing, promotion, and other employment decisions. Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act integrates the two principles of disparate treatment and disparate impact. Disparate treatment is when an employee is treated differently due to the factors mentioned above. Whereas disparate impact specifies the broader scope of employer policies that yield a negative impact on many employees with the traits mentioned above.…
Even though these particular policies are put in place discrimination still exists in a number of organizations throughout the United States. There are many types of discrimination that take place. The types of discrimination prohibited in Title VII are based on individual 's race, color, religion, sex or national origin. Title VII is also used in cases of sexual harassment, disparate impact, and disparate treatment.…
Title VII does not afford any protection for affinity orientation discrimination. Where an employer could be involved in a lawsuit is when states have laws that prohibit affinity discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. With that said Employers should treat sexual orientation of its employees as irrelevant and only judge employees on the merit of their work performance. Employers may wish to add gays, lesbians, and transgender coverage to their antidiscrimination policies.…
Dating back to the 1970s many people, not just women, were on the rise to seek equality among the sexes. Title IX, passed in 1972 by congress during the Nixon administration, was a direct result of the developing social changes and the growing importance of athletics and education in American culture. Before the amendment was passed, schools had the ability to indirectly restrict women from receiving a higher education and participating in collegiate sports by raising the average grade standard to be admitted and only giving out two percent of their scholarship money on average to female athletes. Title IX, or known as the Equal Rights Amendment, would help to transition and change the roles of women in society. Shirley Chisholm spoke on behalf of the Equal Rights Amendment, “The Equal Rights Amendment would govern only the relationship between the State and its citizens – not relationships between private citizens”.…
One case that relates to our industry, is when a transgender man K.S, who works at a resort spa as a massage therapist who is in the middle of transitioning from male to female, was requested by his employer to massage a client who requested for male massage therapist. K.S, has reluctantly asked his employer for a new name tag (male to female). But, his employer denied K.S with a new name tag unless K.S obtained a court order name change or gender change on his driver’s license. Under K.S’ rights under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which made it illegal to discriminate based on gender. According to Transgender Law Center Staff Attorney Matt Wood, “Cases like this one are becoming increasingly common and show the significance of TLC’s recent victory in the Macy v. Holder EEOC decision. K.S. lives in a state where there is no explicit state law prohibiting gender identity discrimination in employment. Because of Macy, K.S. was able to show his employer that federal law protects transgender workers and prohibits the company from treating him differently than other men in his workplace. I’m proud we were able to help empower K.S. as well as the more than 2,000 transgender and gender non-conforming people who contact our legal helpline every…
The Virginia Military Institute was a higher education school in Virginia. It claimed to train the leaders of the future, or “citizen-soldiers” and impart to its students great discipline; however, it only enrolled male students. In 1996, the United States government sued the state of Virginia and the Virginia Military Institute for its male-only policy as a violation of the Fourteenth amendment’s Equal Protection Clause. The District Court ruled in the school’s favor. The Fourth Circuit “reversed and ordered Virginia to remedy the constitutional violation” (Van Camp). In return, Virginia proposed a similar program for women: the Virginia Women’s Institute for Leadership, which would be located at Mary Baldwin College, a private liberal arts…
It’s difficult to choose which type of discrimination needs the most immediate attention, especially on a world scale, as there are so many forms of prejudice and many I am unaware of .With the ones I do know about it’s difficult to choose the one that creates the most harm. Is the discrimination against women the most damaging as they are a significant part of our population? Should we address the violence against them and the economic and social repression? Should we address the strain of nationalism and anti-immigrant rhetoric that is abundant in countries like the U.S and Britain? Should we address the discrimination against people of the Islāmic faith or those of the LGBTQ community?…