Transformation of Traditional Marketing Communications in to Paradigms of Social Media Networking

Transformation of Traditional Marketing Communications in to Paradigms of Social Media Networking
T.R. Gopalakrishnan Nair and Kumarashvari Subramaniam
Effective Communication for marketing is a vital field in business organizations, which is used to convey the details about their products and services to the market segments and subsequently to build long lasting customer relationships. This paper focuses on an emerging component of the integrated marketing communication, ie. social media st networking, as it is increasingly becoming the trend. In 21 century, the marketing communication platforms show a tendency to shift towards innovative technology bound people networking which is becoming an acceptable domain of interaction. Though the traditional channels like TV, print media etc. are still active and prominent in marketing communication, the presences of the Internet and more specifically the Social Media Networking, has started influencing the way individuals and business enterprises communicate. It has become evident that more individuals and business enterprises are engaging the social media networking sites either to accelerate the sales of their products and services or to provide post-purchase feedbacks. This shift in scenario has motivated this research which took six months (June 2011 – December 2011), using empirical analysis which is carried out based on several primary and secondary evidences. The research paper also analyzes the factors that govern the social media networking sites to influence consumers and subsequently enable their purchase decisions. The secondary data presented for this research were those pertaining to the period between the year 2005 and year 2011. The study revealed promising facts like the transition to marketing through SMN gives visible advantages like bidirectional communication, interactive product presentation, and a firm influence on customer who has a rudimentary interest. It is also important to note that sampling studies mostly dealt with fortune 500 companies. It gives promising results of providing virtual shopping experience and interactive marketing through Social media networks.

Field of Research: Marketing communication, Social Media Networking

1.0 Introduction
The marketing mixes primarily focuses on four key parameters, i.e. product, price, promotion and place. However, in this study the promotion or the Marketing Communication (MC) parameter will be discussed as it is a vital field in business organizations.

____________________________________________
Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd University, Aramco Endowed Chair, Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd University, Al Khobar, 31952, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. [e-mail], www.trgnair.org Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd University, Faculty, College of Business, Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd University, Al Khobar, 31952, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. [e-mail], [e-mail]

MC is used to convey the details about a business organization‟s products and services to the market segments and subsequently to build long lasting customer relationships. In 21st century, the MC platforms show a tendency to shift towards people networking which is innovative and technology bound. It is also becoming an acceptable domain of interaction. Though the Traditional Marketing Communication (TMC) channels like TV, print media, physical public relations, trade fairs etc. are still active and prominent in MC, the presences of the Internet and more specifically the Social Media Networking (SMN) has revolutionized the way individuals and business enterprises communicate. Even though at the initial stage the Internet was perceived as a “virtual announcement board” but in recent years, i.e. since 2006 or 2007 it has evolved steadily and has constructively incorporates the SMN. The SMN sites, to name a few - such as Facebook (http://www.facebook.com), flickr (http://www.flickr.com), YouTube (http://www.youtube.com), allow individuals to be part of the same social network which allows individuals to share information and communicate on the network regardless of any geographical or timing restriction. The social media is defined as a “group of Internet based applications that build on the ideological and technological foundations of Web 2.0 and that allow the creation of exchange of User Generated Content” (Kaplan & Haenlein, 2010). Social media is a practice that takes place among identified population, who gather virtually share information, knowledge and post-purchase feedback (Safko & Brake, 2009). The emerging patterns in social networks are as friends list, status updates platform, open data access, media sharing and transparency (Forgue, 2011). The emerging numbers of SMN sites are large and consequently the numbers of users involved in it are escalating too. Figure 1 gives an overview of SMN sites with number of users for the period ending 2008. The figure indicates that millions of populations are actively engaging either in one or multiple SMN sites for the reason of “communicating”. Figure 1: Social Media Networking Sites with Number of Users for the Period Ending 2008
350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Facebook Orkut Ozone Twitter Yahoo Flickr Linkedin Badoo Mixi Social Media Networking Sites

Facebook has the highest number of users with over 300 million and the number has reached over 750 million in 2011. Additionally, the other SMN sites that share the pie are SMN sites such as Orkut, Ozone, Twitter, yahoo, Flicker, LinkedIn, Badoo, Mixi, etc. The SMN sites generally have gained a strong positioning in the mind set of population due to its uniqueness such as: large market reach or penetration with low cost, easy to set up, accessibility from anywhere, quick information exchange, review, tracking and considered as “entertainment” platform. On the other hand, TMC which is a one way

milion

communication channels or platforms fails to provide that uniqueness. It is clear that the 20th century marketing platform remained usually unidirectional and required a substantial budget and time to get the expected outcome. For a marketing effort to be successful, or to see a substantial return on investment, it requires a high cost promotion and its ability to reach intended target audience unfortunately often remained partial. The shifting on consumer and business organization towards SMN for communication purpose is becoming clear and increasing in a large pace.

2.0 Factors Influencing Decisions
The rising embracement towards SMN sites has changed the way individuals and organizations interact within a business context (Barnes & Barnes, 2009).For the computer know-how generation MySpace, Mixi, Orkut etc has become the daily “checking” job. It is very much clear that SMN is affecting the way people communicate, make decisions, socialize, learn, entertain themselves, interact with each other or even do their shopping (Constantinides & Fountain, 2008). Global internet audience surpasses 1 billion visitors with Asia Pacific region accounts for 41% of internet users (Comscore, 2009). The survey conducted by (IAB Spain Research, 2009) among users of SMN sites claimed that almost 50% of the social networking services on the Internet are used as the means to obtain information. According to (Morgan, 2010) the SMN platform users have exceeded the number of email users in July 2009. E-marketers predicted that 80% of the businesses (with more 100 employees) will adopt social media for marketing purposes by 2011 (Social Media Marketing Statistics, 2010). The favourable reception and exercise on the SMN is becomes the postmodern marketing behavior (Razorfish.com, 2008). This change in postmodern marketing is boosted up by the generation Y and the current millennium generation (Tapscott, 2009). It is clearly seen that the millennium and the generation Y are widely connected with technology and it has become as their second nature of those generations. It has becomes as an important tool in the marketing mix of promotion. The reaching ability through the SMN can reach at outsized magnitude at a small percentage of the charge and it is able to customize the desired audience groups according to the business objectives, at any time. (Caroli, 2008) 91% consumer contents is the first aid to a buying decisions. According to (Marketing Sherpa 2007) 87% trust a friend‟s recommendation. SMN users are 3 times more likely to trust peer opinions over advertising when making purchase decisions (Social Business Plus.com, 2010) A number of significant factors contribute to this success. Technologies have made it possible for an individual to communicate with thousands to millions of people globally, through wireless, mobile and other connectivity (Mangold & Faulds, 2009). These virtual networks are becoming very much a part of everyday conversations in post-modern society (Simmons, 2008). As a new marketing channel, SMN sites give the easy access, relatively low organizational set-up cost, a global reach, interactive benefits etc . Business organizations are embracing SMN in order to communicate with their target audience. Additionally, SMN sites has becomes factor attribute in purchase decision making. In marketing concept such tools are important factor. According to marketing gurus the factors that influence purchase decisions are based on cultural, social, personal and psychological. However, in this current digital era the SMN sites have become another factor that influences consumers on purchase decisions. (Evans, 2008) emphasizes the role of social feedback cycle as a purchase validation tool. Social

media connects these experiences back to the purchase process forming a new channel of social feedback of experiences. (Harriesinteractive.com, 2010) puts forward the fact that 71% of consumers indicate that they are substantially influenced by family and friends in arriving at purchase decision. People on Twitter recommend specific companies through their tweets for product and process and this amount to 53% of whole tweets on commercial discussions and out of that 48% express their intentions to buy certain specific products, (Mackenzie, 2011). Additionally, consumers‟ trusts are gained by having a secure site, reviews and web store aesthetics. According to (Channel Advisor, 2010) about 83% of holiday shoppers are influenced by consumer reviews. Figure 2 indicates factors influencing the decision making process. In the past, consumers were influenced by type (a) factors. However, with the advancement in the technology and with the growing number of influential SMN, consumer‟s decision making process are not only dependent on the conventional method, but also getting empowered with SMN sites and feedbacks along with post-purchase reviews of type (b). Figure 2: Influence of social media on purchasing decision type (a)
Problem Recognition Cultural, Social, Personal & Psychological

Customer Cognition Process Product Performance Feedback

Feedbacks’ from Social Media Networking type (b)

Purchase Decision Weight

According to (Kelley & Hyde, 2002), advertising methods to target audience, steps through four typical stages: awareness, interest, desire and action (AIDA). However in the modern MC concepts it goes far beyond, short and precise communication style, heavy involvement of social communication, ability to gain product information and the controlling mechanism. (Erickson, 2010) indicates that the millennium generation playing the leading role in social network usage.

Figure 3: (Kathryn, 2010), Growth of Social Networking Site‟s Usage, for the period of 2008-2010, by Generation
93 83 67 62 36 40 20 0 Millennials (18-33) Gen X (34-45) Boomers (4564) 2008 2010 Silent Gen (65-73) All online Adults (18+) 34 11 35 61

100 80 60

29

The Figure 3 indicates the millennium generation has the highest social networking rate. The rate among Generation X increased about double the percentage, while it tripled among the Silent Generation, going from 11% to 34%. Overall, 79% of US adults above 18 years can be classified as “online.” The diagram also clearly indicates that a solid majority of working adults are online regularly. However, adults in their retirement years are online at notably lower levels. No one can deny that videos, messages, online advertisements are reviewed every milliseconds and it reflects that this fast growing SMN sites are well connected and getting integrated with people‟s life, (Lichtenberg, 2011). The thought for SMN as a communication tool was experimented in the last couple of years. But what really happening now is, the SMN is meeting or exceeding the customer‟s perceptions in providing hybridized information what so ever they needed virtually. This progression will challenge business organization how they want to prepare virtually or involve on the SMN in order to be connected with people. Moreover, the SMN has become a part of life and its growth is someway subtle. It is to be noted that SMN is growing steadily and continuously.

3.0 Ultimate Virtual Shop with decisions at home
The Ultimate Virtual Shop (UVS) intends to give its target audience the pleasure of having the mall viewed on the personal computer, iPods, or tablet. The UVS is going to be a success in this digital era, as it provides the digital generation unique benefits like transparent communication, learning opportunity before action and post-purchase feedback from other consumers in the virtual arena etc. which are absent on a regular mall shopping experience. Therefore, the reality of the virtual shop not only gives the benefit of saving time on travelling, hitting the traffic, long queues and so on. Ultimately, it gives the value of freedom, customize and personalize touch. Finally, everything happens fast. Tesco Corporation has successfully captured its South Korean market in the UVS. The country that has 50 million population and about a fifth of them

possessing smart phones and has long working hours and less leisure time habit has naturally turned to these new modes of markets. Survey by (Harrisinteractive.com, 2010) claimed that 90% of consumers have a better overall shopping experience when they research products online before shopping instore. The number of business organization engaging in the SMN sites is rather increasing. It is a clear indication that social media can be viewed as an important channel and tool to interact with target audience and a tool for creating brand awareness too. When consumers stay at home and engage in purchasing process, this actually leads to a budget bound operation, as the consumers are not walking through the mall leading to an impulse purchase. Additionally, the demographic pattern of woman consumers is changing in a dramatic pace because today, women are working longer hours and the nature of traditional family pattern is changing. Time is precious and people are looking forward to more convenience. Hence people tend to decide their further purchases of food and other stuff virtually while waiting for a bus, tube etc.

4.0

Outreach Analysis

SMN has become increasingly noticeable as a virtual advise seeking platform. It is given the freedom for people in decision making. The SMN sites have attracted a large number of individuals that contribute various contents on the internet, (Bell, 2007). On the hand, business enterprises have made huge investments in recent years in order to gain high return on marketing investments. To start with Microsoft - 240 millions in Face book platform and Google - 900 millions in MySpace. Additionally, other largest Fortune 500 firms use Twitter, Facebook, YouTube or blogs to heavily dialogue with their target audience, 79% business organizations are accounted for these transactions (Thajudeen, 2011). Figure 4: (Beese, 2011), Business Industries Accounted for Most Facebook Pages

30 25 20 15 10 5 0

Figure 4 shows that insurance companies accounted with most facebook pages, with 27 followed by specialty retail and food production & services which both accounts for 24 pages. On the other hand, the most effective platforms in terms of mobilizing consumers to talk about products are Facebook with 86% followed by Twitter at 65%, blogs and reviews are tied at 55%.

Number of Pages

Figure 5: Companies Using Social Media Networking Sites
Facebook Twitter 15% 23% 27% Blogger 3% YouTube MySpace

32%

The pie-chart, Figure 5 shows that most business enterprises use Facebook and followed by twitter, blogs, Youtube and MySpace in order to communicate with their target market. In addition to that, 308 out of the 500 Fortune have an active Twitter account, and nearly half of the whole tweets are done by top 200 companies (Dugan, 2011). The companies that ranked higher in the Fortune 500 appear to be embracing Twitter more intensely than those that are ranked lower. Further, this study shows that Google, ranked as number 92, has maximum amount of followers of all the Fortune 500, with roughly over 3 million followers. Whole Foods, Starbucks and Southwest Airlines etc have followers amounting to a million. The Figure 6 indicates Fortune 500 business enterprises that have the most FaceBook fans, (Cohen, 2011)
Figure 6: Companies with Number of Facebook Fans
Nike

Target
Companies Kohl 's Levi 's Wal-Mart McDonald 's Starbucks Coca-cola 0 5,000,00010,000,00015,000,00020,000,00025,000,00030,000,00035,000,000 Number of Fans

SMN is not only used as a social networking platform but its usage is moving towards doing business virtually (Benioff, 2011). SMN plays a key role in the marketing mix of promotion, where it‟s have a rich ability to interact with people and effectively connecting to its market. SMN sites are the fastest-mounting class on the Internet and doubling-up their traffic over the last year (Comscore.com, 2009). In addition to that, in the US social media and blogs reach nearly 80% of active US internet users and represent the majority of American‟s time online. Out of those 80% population 60% of

people use to learn a specific brand or information about specific retailer. It is also noticed that 48% of these consumers responded to a retailer‟s offer as posted on FaceBook or Twitter. Figure 7: (Henrikson, 2011), US Internet Users who use Social Networking Sites – by Age
100 90 80 70 Percentage 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2005 2008 2009 2010 65+, 26 30-49, 61 50-64, 47 18-29, 86

(Forrester Research, 2010), has stated that sales through the Internet will be accounted for 53% of total retail sales, as consumers actively and increasingly use the Internet to research products before a purchase decision is made. Further, Forresters also projected that the total retail sales for each year, beginning from 2010 to 2014 will be influenced by the World Wide Web at a rate of 46%, 48%, 50%, 51% and 53% for each year respectively.. (Bazaarvoice.com, 2010) found that 91% of millionaires always look at reviews before they buy luxury goods and 68% of ultra-affluent shoppers tend to use consumer reviews for finalizing purchases.

5.0 Conclusion
The Social Media Networking (SMN) sites are becoming more effective in marketing information dissemination and it is found that the percentage of such paradigm shift will increase continuously in the near future. SMN sites or platforms are not a direct business solution approach but it is another tool that can be used to build and maintain relationships and increase returns on the marketing investments business firms do. The progression of SMN sites and the involvement of consumers with them, are growing in fast pace. Therefore, it looks logical for modern business organizations to come forward to a point to involve themselves appropriately in the SMN sites, in order to engage with their targeted evolving market segments. They have to further study how they can increase their returns on marketing investment using these trends and enable themselves to generate a long lasting customer relationship. This scenario might compel business organizations to arrive at a trade-off position between TMC platforms and SMN, in order to satisfy their target audience and sustain their business surplus. In conclusion, there exists a good chance that most of the business organizations may embrace the SMN which will give them a visible advantage in bidirectional communication, interactive product presentation, and a firm influence on customer who has only a rudimentary interest in the beginning. Finally, it can expose promising features of providing virtual shopping experience and interactive marketing.

References
1. Forgue, A. 2011, „Emerging Patterns in Social Networking Applications‟, Development, Events, Available at: http://www.inetinteractive.com/blog/development/emerging-patterns-in-socialnetworking-applications/ [Assessed on 30 October 2011] 2. Barnes, N.D. & Barnes, F.R. 2009, 'Equipping Your Organization for the Social Networking Game‟, Information Management Journal. vol.43, issue 6 3. Bazaarvoice.com, n.d., „Social Commerce Statistics‟, Consumer Demands for Rating and Reviews, Available at: http://www.bazaarvoice.com/resources/stats [Assessed on 10 October 2011] 4. Benioff, M, 2011, „Cloudforce Japan 2011‟, The Largest Social Enterprise Event in Japan, Available at: http://www.salesforce.com/company/news-press/press-releases/2011/12/1112132.jsp [Assessed on 12 December 2011] 5. Cavoli, B, 2008, „Digital Influence Group‟, Measuring the Influence of Social Media Available at: http://www.slideshare.net/DigitalInfluence/business-impact-of-social-media [Assessed on 10 December 2011] 6. Channel Advisor, 2010, „Through the Eyes of the Consumer‟, 2010 Consumer Shopping Habits Survey, Available at: http://go.channeladvisor.com/rs/channeladvisor/images/us-wp-consumersurvey-2010.pdf [Assessed on 27 November 2011] 7. ComScore.com, 2009, „Press Release‟, Global Internet Audience Surpasses 1 Billion Visitors, Available at: http://www.comscore.com/Press_Events/Press_Releases/2009/1/Global_Internet_Audience_1_ Billion [Assessed on 18 November 2011] 8. Constantinides, E & Fountain, S. 2008, „Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing’ Practice 9, pp. 231 – 244. Available at: http://www.palgravejournals.com/dddmp/journal/v9/n3/pdf/4350098a.pdf [Assessed on 28 November 2011] 9. Cohen, D, 2011, „Only 289 of the fortune 500 are on FaceBook‟, study, Available at: http://www.allfacebook.com/only-289-of-the-fortune-500-are-on-facebook-2011-11[Assessed on 11 December 2011] 10. Erickson, D, 2010, Social media use by generation, E-strategy.com, Available at: http://afterhours.e-strategy.com/social-media-use-by-generation-chart?utm_source=eStrategy+Daily+Numbers&utm_campaign=138932d6e2eDaily_Numbers_2010_12_27&utm_medium=email [Assessed on 30 September 2011] 11. Evans, D, 2008, „Social Media Marketing‟, “An Hour a Day”. John Wiley and Sons. Hoboken, NJ, USA. 12. Forrester Research, 2010, „Forrester Forecast‟, Online Retail Sales will grow to $250 Billion by 2014, Available at: http://techcrunch.com/2010/03/08/forrester-forecast-online-retail-sales-willgrow-to-250-billion-by-2014/ [Assessed on 31 December 2011] 13. Frank, B, 2007, „The rise of user-generated content‟, You can make the power of the individual contributor work for your business, Available at: http://www.entrepreneur.com/technology/managingtechnology/web20columnistfrankbell/article1 83432.html [Assessed on 12 October 2011] 14. Harrisinteractive.com, 2010, „Harris Polls‟, Speak Now or Forever Hold Your Tweets, Available at: http://www.harrisinteractive.com/NewsRoom/HarrisPolls/tabid/447/mid/1508/articleId/403/ctl/Re adCustom%20Default/Default.aspx [Assessed on 21 October 2011] 15. IAB Spain Research, 2009, Observatory on ICT. Accessibility of Social Networking Services Available at: www.discapnet.es/.../Accessibility_Observatory_on_Social_Networks.doc [Assessed on 30 November 2011] 16. Henrikson, J.U. 2011, „The Growth of Social Media‟, An info graphic, Available at http://www.searchenginejournal.com/the-growth-of-social-media-an-infographic/32788/ [Assessed on 28 November 2011] 17. Beese, J, 2011, „Social networks influence 74% of consumers‟ buying decisions‟, Available at: http://sproutsocial.com/insights/2011/11/social-networks-influcne-buying-decisions[Assessed on 23 December 2011]

18. Mackenzie, J, 2011, „Hotel Online Reputation Research, Statistics and Quotes‟, Role of reviews and reputation on buying process, Available at: http://www.reviewpro.com/reputation-researchstatistics-2767 [Assessed on 2 December 2011] 19. Kaplan, A. M. & Haenlein 2010, „Users of the world, unite!‟, The challenge and opportunities of social media, Business Horizons, Greenwich: 2010. Vol. 53, Iss. 1 20. Kathryn Z, 2010, „Pew Research Center‟s Internet and American Life Project‟, 2010 Tracking Survey, Available at: http://pewinternet.org/~/media/Files/Reports/2010/PIP_Generations_and_Tech10.pdf [ Assessed on 15 December 2011] 21. Kelley & Hyde, 2002: CIM Coursebook Marketing in Practice (Elsevier Butterworth–Heinemann, 2002) Available at: http://v5.books.elsevier.com/bookscat/samples/9780750682954/9780750682954.PDF [Assessed on 11 October 2011] 22. Dugan, L, 2011, „62% of Fortune 500s Have Twitter account‟, study, Available at: http://www.mediabistro.com/alltwitter/62-percent-of-fortune-500s-have-a-twitter-accountstudy_b153311 [Assessed on 22 November 2011] 23. Mangold, W.G. & Faulds, D.J. 2009, „Social Media‟, The New Hybrid Element of the Promotion Mix’, Business Horizons”, Greenwich: Jul/Aug, vol.52, issue 4. 24. Marketing Sherpa, 2007, „Power of word of mouth social networking‟, Available at http://www.dreamsuccessmanagement.com/statistics.html [Assessed on 26 December 2011] 25. Lichtenberg, R, 2011, ‟10 Ways Social Media will change in 2011”, Available at: http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/10_ways_social_media_will_change_in_2011.php [Assessed on 15 December 2011] 26.Razorfish.com, 2008, “Consumer Experience Report”. Available at: http://www.razorfish.com/#/ideas/reports-and-papers/special-reports/ [Assessed on 25 December 2011] 27. Safko, L. and Brake, D.K (2009), „The Social Media Bible‟, Tactics, Tools & Strategies for Business Success. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 28. Simmons, G, 2008. Marketing to postmodern consumers: Introducing the Internet chameleon. European Journal of Marketing, Bradford: 2008. Vol. 42, Iss. ⁄ 29. Social Business Plus.com, 2010, „The Power of Consumer Influence‟, Effect of Social Media on Business, Available at: http://www.socialbusinessplus.com/effect-on-business.html [Assessed on 30 December 2011] 30.Social Media Marketing Statistics, 2010, Available at: http://www.penn-olson.com/2010/12/13 social-media-marketing-statistics/ [Assessed on 18 November 2011] 31. Morgan, S. 2010, Available at:http://www.socialware.com/resources/research/social-mediaindustry-statistics/[Assessed on 18 October 2011] 32. Tapscott. D. 2009, „Grown Up Digital’, McGraw Hill, New York 2009, Available at: http://www.creativegeneration.nl/cg-en/page.php?id=13 [Assessed on 22 October 2011] 33. Thajudeen, T, 2011, „Social Media Facts‟, A must or just another option? Available at: http://www.thanzyl.com/2011/01/fb-twitter-and-linkedin-facts-a-must-or-just-another-option-bythanzyl-thajudeen/ [Assessed on 30 December 2011]

References: 1. Forgue, A. 2011, „Emerging Patterns in Social Networking Applications‟, Development, Events, Available at: http://www.inetinteractive.com/blog/development/emerging-patterns-in-socialnetworking-applications/ [Assessed on 30 October 2011] 2. Barnes, N.D. & Barnes, F.R. 2009, 'Equipping Your Organization for the Social Networking Game‟, Information Management Journal. vol.43, issue 6 3. Bazaarvoice.com, n.d., „Social Commerce Statistics‟, Consumer Demands for Rating and Reviews, Available at: http://www.bazaarvoice.com/resources/stats [Assessed on 10 October 2011] 4. Benioff, M, 2011, „Cloudforce Japan 2011‟, The Largest Social Enterprise Event in Japan, Available at: http://www.salesforce.com/company/news-press/press-releases/2011/12/1112132.jsp [Assessed on 12 December 2011] 5. Cavoli, B, 2008, „Digital Influence Group‟, Measuring the Influence of Social Media Available at: http://www.slideshare.net/DigitalInfluence/business-impact-of-social-media [Assessed on 10 December 2011] 6. Channel Advisor, 2010, „Through the Eyes of the Consumer‟, 2010 Consumer Shopping Habits Survey, Available at: http://go.channeladvisor.com/rs/channeladvisor/images/us-wp-consumersurvey-2010.pdf [Assessed on 27 November 2011] 7. ComScore.com, 2009, „Press Release‟, Global Internet Audience Surpasses 1 Billion Visitors, Available at: http://www.comscore.com/Press_Events/Press_Releases/2009/1/Global_Internet_Audience_1_ Billion [Assessed on 18 November 2011] 8. Constantinides, E & Fountain, S. 2008, „Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing’ Practice 9, pp. 231 – 244. Available at: http://www.palgravejournals.com/dddmp/journal/v9/n3/pdf/4350098a.pdf [Assessed on 28 November 2011] 9. Cohen, D, 2011, „Only 289 of the fortune 500 are on FaceBook‟, study, Available at: http://www.allfacebook.com/only-289-of-the-fortune-500-are-on-facebook-2011-11[Assessed on 11 December 2011] 10. Erickson, D, 2010, Social media use by generation, E-strategy.com, Available at: http://afterhours.e-strategy.com/social-media-use-by-generation-chart?utm_source=eStrategy+Daily+Numbers&utm_campaign=138932d6e2eDaily_Numbers_2010_12_27&utm_medium=email [Assessed on 30 September 2011] 11. Evans, D, 2008, „Social Media Marketing‟, “An Hour a Day”. John Wiley and Sons. Hoboken, NJ, USA. 12. Forrester Research, 2010, „Forrester Forecast‟, Online Retail Sales will grow to $250 Billion by 2014, Available at: http://techcrunch.com/2010/03/08/forrester-forecast-online-retail-sales-willgrow-to-250-billion-by-2014/ [Assessed on 31 December 2011] 13. Frank, B, 2007, „The rise of user-generated content‟, You can make the power of the individual contributor work for your business, Available at: http://www.entrepreneur.com/technology/managingtechnology/web20columnistfrankbell/article1 83432.html [Assessed on 12 October 2011] 14. Harrisinteractive.com, 2010, „Harris Polls‟, Speak Now or Forever Hold Your Tweets, Available at: http://www.harrisinteractive.com/NewsRoom/HarrisPolls/tabid/447/mid/1508/articleId/403/ctl/Re adCustom%20Default/Default.aspx [Assessed on 21 October 2011] 15. IAB Spain Research, 2009, Observatory on ICT. Accessibility of Social Networking Services Available at: www.discapnet.es/.../Accessibility_Observatory_on_Social_Networks.doc [Assessed on 30 November 2011] 16. Henrikson, J.U. 2011, „The Growth of Social Media‟, An info graphic, Available at http://www.searchenginejournal.com/the-growth-of-social-media-an-infographic/32788/ [Assessed on 28 November 2011] 17. Beese, J, 2011, „Social networks influence 74% of consumers‟ buying decisions‟, Available at: http://sproutsocial.com/insights/2011/11/social-networks-influcne-buying-decisions[Assessed on 23 December 2011] 18. Mackenzie, J, 2011, „Hotel Online Reputation Research, Statistics and Quotes‟, Role of reviews and reputation on buying process, Available at: http://www.reviewpro.com/reputation-researchstatistics-2767 [Assessed on 2 December 2011] 19. Kaplan, A. M. & Haenlein 2010, „Users of the world, unite!‟, The challenge and opportunities of social media, Business Horizons, Greenwich: 2010. Vol. 53, Iss. 1 20. Kathryn Z, 2010, „Pew Research Center‟s Internet and American Life Project‟, 2010 Tracking Survey, Available at: http://pewinternet.org/~/media/Files/Reports/2010/PIP_Generations_and_Tech10.pdf [ Assessed on 15 December 2011] 21. Kelley & Hyde, 2002: CIM Coursebook Marketing in Practice (Elsevier Butterworth–Heinemann, 2002) Available at: http://v5.books.elsevier.com/bookscat/samples/9780750682954/9780750682954.PDF [Assessed on 11 October 2011] 22. Dugan, L, 2011, „62% of Fortune 500s Have Twitter account‟, study, Available at: http://www.mediabistro.com/alltwitter/62-percent-of-fortune-500s-have-a-twitter-accountstudy_b153311 [Assessed on 22 November 2011] 23. Mangold, W.G. & Faulds, D.J. 2009, „Social Media‟, The New Hybrid Element of the Promotion Mix’, Business Horizons”, Greenwich: Jul/Aug, vol.52, issue 4. 24. Marketing Sherpa, 2007, „Power of word of mouth social networking‟, Available at http://www.dreamsuccessmanagement.com/statistics.html [Assessed on 26 December 2011] 25. Lichtenberg, R, 2011, ‟10 Ways Social Media will change in 2011”, Available at: http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/10_ways_social_media_will_change_in_2011.php [Assessed on 15 December 2011] 26.Razorfish.com, 2008, “Consumer Experience Report”. Available at: http://www.razorfish.com/#/ideas/reports-and-papers/special-reports/ [Assessed on 25 December 2011] 27. Safko, L. and Brake, D.K (2009), „The Social Media Bible‟, Tactics, Tools & Strategies for Business Success. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 28. Simmons, G, 2008. Marketing to postmodern consumers: Introducing the Internet chameleon. European Journal of Marketing, Bradford: 2008. Vol. 42, Iss. ⁄ 29. Social Business Plus.com, 2010, „The Power of Consumer Influence‟, Effect of Social Media on Business, Available at: http://www.socialbusinessplus.com/effect-on-business.html [Assessed on 30 December 2011] 30.Social Media Marketing Statistics, 2010, Available at: http://www.penn-olson.com/2010/12/13 social-media-marketing-statistics/ [Assessed on 18 November 2011] 31. Morgan, S. 2010, Available at:http://www.socialware.com/resources/research/social-mediaindustry-statistics/[Assessed on 18 October 2011] 32. Tapscott. D. 2009, „Grown Up Digital’, McGraw Hill, New York 2009, Available at: http://www.creativegeneration.nl/cg-en/page.php?id=13 [Assessed on 22 October 2011] 33. Thajudeen, T, 2011, „Social Media Facts‟, A must or just another option? Available at: http://www.thanzyl.com/2011/01/fb-twitter-and-linkedin-facts-a-must-or-just-another-option-bythanzyl-thajudeen/ [Assessed on 30 December 2011]