Preview

Truman Political Influence

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1823 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Truman Political Influence
This paper will identify the political influences that contributed to President Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb on Japan. The reason this topic is important is because the decision to drop the atomic bombs on Japan during World War II has had a lasting impact on U.S. foreign policy. The information on the political influences affecting Truman’s decision will be from Truman by David McCullough; Code-Name Downfall by Thomas B. Allen and Norman Polmar; America’s Rise to World Power by Foster Rhea Dulles, and The Atomic Bomb and American Foreign Policy by Barton J. Bernstein, “Nuclear Non-Proliferation” by Lawrence Scheinman, “The Atomic Bomb” by Campbell Craig and Sergey Radchenko and Prompt and Utter Destruction by Samuel J. Walker. …show more content…
Truman was not just thinking about ending the war; he was thinking about how we could best enter postwar negotiations with the Soviet Union. Professor Bernstein thought the bomb was a tool used to "thwart Soviet ambitions", and that it was "deemed a useful counterweight to Soviet expansion". This supports Dulles’s claims, which included that the Soviet Union would not be as willing to cooperate in peace as in war. Upon entering post-war negotiations, the U.S. wanted to have more leverage over the Soviet Union. The U.S. and the Soviet Union had conflicting ideals concerning the spread of communism. Truman was scared of Stalin expanding his power around the globe through communism. With the possibility of conflict between the two countries (U.S. and U.S.S.R.), Truman wanted to show off America’s powerful new weapon. This was partly done to intimidate the Soviets and hope they became less aggressive after seeing the destruction that the bomb could create, but Truman also wanted see for himself what the bomb could do to another country, so if the time came, he could use it knowing full well what it would

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    In this essay I will discuss the reasons for and against whether America was right to drop the two atomic bombs. These two bombs were unloaded on Hiroshima, 6th August 1945, and attempted to hit Nagasaki, 9th August 1945. America gave the two bombs code names, the one that was dropped on Hiroshima was called ‘Little Boy’. This bomb was made of uranium. The final death toll added up to 135,000. The nuclear bomb that fell on Nagasaki was called ‘Fat Man’. This bomb was made of plutonium. The final death toll was about 70,000. This was because the bomb had missed its allocated target and instead fell into a valley.…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    After years of war and destruction, American soldiers and civilians were beyond weary and restless, yet the Japanese were steadfast and refused to give up their fight. Sworn in as the 33rd United States president, after Franklin D. Roosevelt’s sudden death, Harry S. Truman presided over the end of WWII. When Truman learned of the success of the “Manhattan Project” he knew that he was faced with a decision of unparalleled gravity. He was well aware that the capacity to end the war with Japan was in his hands, however, he was also aware that it would involve unleashing the most terrible weapon the world had ever known. July 26, 1945 President Truman, United Kingdom Prime Minister Winston Churchill, and Chairman of the Chinese Nationalist Government Chiang Kaishek, released the Potsdam Declaration.…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    President Truman’s decision of the atomic bombing has undeniably made a huge impact to world’s history events. Throughout decades, many individuals’ have encountered diverse explanations as to why it was necessary for the dropping of the atomic bomb. While others believe it was essential, some may think that it caused an enormous catastrophe, murdering millions of innocent civilians and produced a generation with an atrocious radiation poison. Years has passed by and it continues to be the utmost talked about event. The atomic bombing that took place in Japan can be argued that it was the greatest decision made by president Truman. There are majority of different schools of thought behind President Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bombing. Readings that have been encountered can conclude that President Truman’s decision was a great one. This event prevented future fatalities amongst the Japanese as well as the Americans, ended the world war II, and it was the only option handed to Truman.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    U.S World History 05.06

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages

    It shouldn’t have happened because it killed lots of innocent people. When the Japanese had got bombed, they had finally noticed that we were serious the first two times about surrendering. They had made sure that we had the upper hand during WW2. Truman thought it would end the war a lot faster. Of course they did, but under one condition. The condition was that their Emperor got to keep his thrown.…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    By dropping the atomic bombs it was possible that it could prevent Russia from trying to invade or possibly try to take over the United States on down the line. This could have helped push Truman’s decision to drop the…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Harry Truman was a president who volunteered in WW1. Harry Truman was born in Missouri on May 8, 1884. He was commonly known for the dropping of the atomic bomb on Japan, which caused many casualties with lives being lost on both sides such as in Japan and the U.S., however this ended the war even faster and ended the conflict with the pacific. In this paper I will argue that Harry Truman was wrong for dropping the atomic bomb on Japan; several reasons why it was wrong for Harry Truman to drop the atomic bomb was Russia got the idea of making nuclear weapons, Japan’s resources were already being wiped out and the amount of civilian casualties Japan had due to the bomb and radiation.…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Butow's Argument Analysis

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Butow’s research on Marcus Kido’s influence on the emperor to accept terms that presented “peace and honor,” influences Feis’ argument. Feis claims that Kido’s ability to persuade Hirohito was crucial in moving Japan towards the choice to surrender. Feis takes a different approach to Butow’s thoughts on Kido’s efforts to surrender; with the understanding that the Japanese public would only end the war if the United States allowed the country to keep the emperor. Investigating Butow’s original claims, Feis identifies that the United States would not move from its demands for unconditional surrender. He argues that due to the country’s internal struggles, Japan directly prolonged the war. Feis argument allows him to question if the United States had not used the atomic bomb would Japan had surrender assembled in August 1945. This approach to history from a military aspect moved the topic of the decision to surrender in a new direction. Feis presents the question of whether the atomic bombs played an essential role in the decision-making that led to the Japanese’s surrender. Feis concludes his arguments by presenting the idea that Japan’s decision to surrender came from the threat that if the war lasted any longer, the United States would use a third atomic bomb. The author broadens the study of Japan’s decision through the understanding that the United States used the atomic bombs as a means to motivate Japan to…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alperovitz argues that Truman and his Secretary of State, James F. Byrnes, thought that if they did not end World War II by dropping the atomic bomb, America would not have added diplomacy strength against the Soviet Union. Alperovitz insists that the decision to drop the bomb could have bolstered the diplomacy objectives in Asia. For example, if the bomb was not dropped it could have created a more harmonious postwar relationship with the Soviet Union. How would Truman have ended the war without dropping the bomb and without having a large amount of casualties? Alperovitz says that the President could have been more eager to welcome the Soviets into the Asian…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Not only was the U.S trying to stop the war, and find peace among the countries, President Truman knew that other countries were discovering the atomic bomb. He knew that those countries would not use the bomb lightly, and take over many countries with its power. So what can be seen, is that the U.S was protecting the nations so disaster did not occur if the wrong people got their hands on the atomic bomb.…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When talking about WW2 and Japan, something that comes to mind often is the atomic bomb. Some people say it was a good thing, as it ended one of the worst war in history. however, some say that it was wrong to drop a bomb of a country that was on the verge of surrender. Proof of this statement, this essay will tell you.…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    His decision statement was to end the war in Japan and his decision criterion was to have Japan surrender unconditionally. Based on this statement and criterion, he then developed alternatives to end the war. These alternatives were to continue the conventional bombings, conduct a ground invasion, drop the atomic bomb, or conduct a demonstration of the atomic bomb to the Japanese (National Park Service, 2017). Once these alternatives were developed, the risks were analyzed. In the end, Truman decided to drop the atomic bomb. On the outside this may seem like a rational decision but the closer you look, the more you realize that this decision was skewed by bias, loyalty, worry over image, and drive for success.…

    • 1914 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For Harry Truman the choice whether to use the bomb or not to use the bomb was one of the most difficult decisions of his life. The American soldiers and civilians were exhausted from four years of war, but still the Japanese military refused to give up there fight. American forces where occupying Okinawa and Iwo Jima and were intensely fire bombing Japanese cities. Japan had an army of 2 million, and they were staying strong. They stationed them selves in the home islands guarding against any invasion. The Allies demanded for immediate surrender, although the demand said that refusal would result in total destruction, there was no mention of any weapon of mass destruction. The Japanese military refused to surrender.…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Harry S. Truman came into the presidency during one of the most turbulent period in American history. Although Truman left office with one of the lowest approval ratings of any president, with the passage of time, his reputation grew. His dedication to decency, honesty, and old-fashioned common sense eventually endeared him in the publics mind. As his daughter later wrote in toward the end of his life, "He is of course, pleased when he hears that one historian or another, or a group of historians, has rated him as one of the right or nine greatest presidents in our history."…

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Truman also had to think about the lives of the Americans. If the United States did not drop this nuclear bomb, then the war would have lasted longer and the American soldiers would have had to continue to fight the Japanese in the air, water, and ground. This would have caused many more American casualties, and would’ve hurt the American military in the long run. While Truman was taking all these consequences into consideration he received a letter from General Groves stating, “If the United States continues to lead in the development of atomic energy weapons, its future will be much safer and the chances of preserving world peace greatly increased.” General Groves was correct in his statement saying that the atomic bomb would be much safer in the future.…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1947, the United States was put in a difficult position. While the Japanese emperor did not want to lose his position, or lose honor, they could either fight until the last man stands or find another way. With the creation of an atomic bomb becoming more and more feasible, with the help of Mr. Einstein, it seemed like a great idea. But, there were many things they didn’t think about when they jumped to the idea of dropping the bomb; some were Japan’s surrender and the future of the civilians. The bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima was not necessary.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays