Trump's Argument Analysis: America First
“America First.” This is Donald Trump’s expectation for future US international policies. In the recent interview with the New York Times, Trump referred to “America First” to be very modern, despite its appearance during the non-intervention movement in the US during World War II (Cole). Trump claimed that his is very different, defining it as “we are going to take care of this country [the United States of America] first before we worry about everybody else in the world.” Trump suggested that many US allies are simply parasites, draining this country resources without proper repayment. Furthermore, Trump asserted that problems within our border make us unfit to be a worldly influential figure. Before delving into Trump’s statement, I would
…show more content…
How can we fix our neighbors’ problems when we ourselves do not have our own house straight? To Trump, we must become a role model, to become a shining beacon, for the rest of the world. However, it is a mistake to assume that we can resolve our civil issues before conditions in other nations deteriorate beyond repair. The story of the US is a story of constant strive toward the riddance of the ever present civil injustices. Starting with our revolution for independence, followed by the eventually abolition of slavery, then the civil rights movement in the mid-twentieth century and the current contention with the police force, new problems have always sprouted from the cracked pavement of our society. Yet, during that time, the US was able to fight off the oppressive forces of Hitler’s Germany and USSR’s communism. And whether we agree with the outcomes or not, the US was successful in getting its way by overthrowing Saddam Hussein in an effort to spread democracy or find the WMD. From these events, we see that the US is a fully capable “lecturer” despite being handicapped by national issues. Turning to an isolationist approach would have unforeseen impacts as we loosen the pressure on more volatile nations to respect civil liberties and human rights
How can we fix our neighbors’ problems when we ourselves do not have our own house straight? To Trump, we must become a role model, to become a shining beacon, for the rest of the world. However, it is a mistake to assume that we can resolve our civil issues before conditions in other nations deteriorate beyond repair. The story of the US is a story of constant strive toward the riddance of the ever present civil injustices. Starting with our revolution for independence, followed by the eventually abolition of slavery, then the civil rights movement in the mid-twentieth century and the current contention with the police force, new problems have always sprouted from the cracked pavement of our society. Yet, during that time, the US was able to fight off the oppressive forces of Hitler’s Germany and USSR’s communism. And whether we agree with the outcomes or not, the US was successful in getting its way by overthrowing Saddam Hussein in an effort to spread democracy or find the WMD. From these events, we see that the US is a fully capable “lecturer” despite being handicapped by national issues. Turning to an isolationist approach would have unforeseen impacts as we loosen the pressure on more volatile nations to respect civil liberties and human rights