Preview

Trump's Immigration Policy Analysis

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
705 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Trump's Immigration Policy Analysis
The writer, Brookings fellow and Lawfare editor-in-chief Benjamin Wittes, had noted the order skipped over a key part of the U.S. code on “inadmissible aliens” which Trump had publicly recited on Wednesday in defense of his immigration restrictions.

READ THE COURT ORDER

The statute reads in part: “Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.”

Wittes wrote that this statute speaks to
…show more content…
CLINTON TROLLS TRUMP

A three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, though, declined to lift a lower-court ruling that suspended the policy on other grounds.

In their unanimous decision, the judges generally referred to the government’s position that such presidential decisions on immigration policy are “unreviewable” – but rejected that argument.

“There is no precedent to support this claimed unreviewability, which runs contrary to the fundamental structure of our constitutional democracy,” the judges wrote. “…Although our jurisprudence has long counseled deference to the political branches on matters of immigration and national security, neither the Supreme Court nor our court has ever held that courts lack the authority to review executive action in those arenas for compliance with the
…show more content…
for Muslims. While the administration now insists this is not a “Muslim” ban, the states challenging the order say it violates the establishment and equal protection clauses of the Constitution because it was meant to target Muslims – pointing to the president’s past statements and other factors.

The court wrote: “The States’ claims raise serious allegations and present significant constitutional questions.”

The Justice Department is now reviewing its options -- which include the possibility of appealing the matter to the Supreme Court, asking for a review from a broader panel of judges or taking the dispute back to the lower court. Or the White House could issue a revised order.

Trump tweeted overnight, “SEE YOU IN COURT,” without specifying which court.

Wittes argued that the 9th Circuit was right to leave the restraining order in place, “for the simple reason that there is no cause to plunge the country into turmoil again while the courts address the merits of these matters over the next few

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit reversed the district court's decision.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Supreme Court case of Sessions v. Morales-Santana deals with the issue of whether or not a distinction based on gender in establishing derivative citizenship for immigrants violates the 5th amendment's guarantee of equal protection. The questions presented by this case are: (1) Whether Congress’s decision to require different physical presence requirements for unwed citizen mothers than unwed citizen fathers in order to pass citizenship to a foreign- born child violates the 5th amendment's guarantee of equal protection and (2) whether the court of appeals was mistaken in granting citizenship in the absence of any statutory authority.Thusly, the rights of immigrants and the right against gender discrimination are both at stake for the petitioner of this case. The case was granted on June 28, 2016, oral argument was held before the Supreme Court on November 9, 2016, and the case was decided on June 12, 2017.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The three judges of the San-Francisco-based Ninth Circuit, among the most liberal in the nation, struck down the administration’s appeal to immediately restore the presidential executive order imposing the controversial travel ban. http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-live-updates-9th-circuit-arguments-trump-travel-ban-2017-htmlstory.html…

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Summary: Baker V. Canada

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Baker, moving the case further, the supreme court of Canada reversed the decision, it stated that procedural fairness expected the immigration officer to consider the human rights of the appellant children in decision making.…

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On January 19, 2000 Lazaro Gonzalez, plaintiff filed this lawsuit, alleging that the INS lacked the authority to reject the asylum applications and was required by federal statutes and regulations to accept and adjudicate those applications. Defendants urge this Court to dismiss the action or, alternatively, to grant summary judgment. Defendants attack the Complaint on various grounds, each of which is addressed below. Having carefully studied this matter, and mindful of the limits on this Court's authority, the Court concludes that Defendants' Motion To Dismiss or Alternative Motion for Summary Judgment must be granted.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What she wants most is for the truth to come out and for her story to be heard.…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Supreme Court Major Cases

    • 4278 Words
    • 18 Pages

    The constitutional issue present in the case was whether or not the Supreme Court had the authority to review acts of Congress and determine whether or not they are unconstitutional, making them void. The other Constitutional issue in the case was whether or not Congress can expand the scope the Supreme Court’s original jurisdiction beyond that which is defined in Article III of the Constitution.…

    • 4278 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    US President Donald Trump signed an executive order on January 27, 2017. The order bans citizens of seven Muslim-majority countries from entering the US for at least 90 days. The order also suspended refugee admission program of the US for 120 days. US officials added that the order is only a first step toward a wider ban, which is aimed at protecting the US from terrorist attacks. The executive order is in line with President Trump’s campaign pledge. He promised a total and complete shutdown of Muslim immigration during his presidential campaign.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    views as to whether or not Judicial review, and the Supreme Court as a whole,…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justice Ginsburg’s dissent argued that Congress’ power to enforce the 14th and 15th Amendments encompasses legislative action such as the Voting Rights Act. She believes Congress does not have unlimited authority, but must show that the means taken rationally advance a legitimate objective. By holding section 4 unconstitutional, the majority’s opinion makes it impossible to effectively enforce section 5. According to her, in voting rights cases the court should defer to Congress, because they have been given sweeping powers to protect such rights. The court should only ask if the methods used by Congress to address the problem are rational, and not subject them to a tougher test. According to Ginsburg, “Congress approached the 2006 reauthorization of the Voting Rights Act with great care and seriousness, the same cannot be said of the court’s…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    11th Amendment

    • 844 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State.…

    • 844 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Illegal Aliens

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It cannot be dismissed that while the United States Constitution addresses immigration and the citizenship process, it does not directly address the processing of illegal aliens in Article I, Section 8, Clause 4: “The Congress shall have Power [to]...establish [a] uniform Rule of Naturalization…” (US Constitution). This gray area may allow, to a degree, an openness for…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Now with this order in place equality would seem imminent since everyone has to abide by the same rules, yet that is false. Since the government is considered our “ruler” equality does not always seem like a possibility, but it is achievable. Whether you are in Congress or just an “everyday” worker, we all are citizens and we all have the same rights. “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States”. This is the first sentence in the Fourteenth Amendment that states no one can be denied of his or her rights or protection from the law. If equality is accomplished then it can create a more placid society and…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil and Criminal Law

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “The judicial power of the federal courts has been limited by Congress. Essentially, it extends to matters involving (1) questions of federal law (federal question cases), (2) the United States as a party, (3) controversies among the states, and (4) certain suits between citizens of different states (diversity of citizenship).” (Reed et al., 2005, Chapter 3)…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    UNITED STATES V Bass

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The U.S. Supreme Court overturned a Sixth Circuit opinion continuing a decision of the federal court to grant John Bass's discovery motion in reference to the selective prosecution. Bass the defendant suspected that the government wanted a death penalty against him based on race thus a motion granted on the discovery concerning the capital charging practices of the government. The District Court settled the discovery motion and then dismissed the notice after the government stated that it would not comply with the discovery order.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays