Tuesdays With Morrrie Analysis

Introduction
Throughout the worldwide famous book “Tuesdays with Morrie”, known as ‘Memoir’ [1] the American writer Mitch Albom presented the truth of life, the benevolent characteristics of people which everybody should have but they don’t have. “Tuesdays with Morrie” is actually a novel based upon an original story that explained the outlook of a dying older man about reality of life. The author examines the statement, “I know it is more important than almost everything they taught us in college,” and split ends that Mitch precisely was stating that while college or other educational institutions teach essential skills, it rarely teach pupils the vigorous importance of pursuing to realize the most intense meanings of our life. He said this
The whole specific speeches of Morrie regarding how love goes on [2]. Mitch felt the feelings of Morrie that it is important to really be involved and dedicated at the presence of any other and also in the course of conversation. Morrie said that at the time of being with someone, one must be fully present solely with that individual and nobody else [3]. He felt that lots of people haven’t found the real meaning of their lives. This is why they hurry and run around again and again in pursue of it. They search more materialistic stuffs which simply provide them by way of no meaning or less meaning [4]. Morrie emphasized the significance on skipping simple talk and actually listening to anyone, without any expectation to get anything as feedback. Mitch inferred that Morrie had given much of his own time and devotion toward others. The main reason behind the visitors in such an extra amount was his time period and attention. Even with his pain and distresses, he continuously listened to others [5]. Albom went into more detail regarding Morrie’s father here. Morrie promised to himself that when he upraised his own offspring he would put emphasis on everything that he had as a child wanted for, i.e. hugging, kissing, gossiping and full of joy and
First of all, it’s a universally accepted concept that most of the famous persons had a very poor quality of institutional education. Somebody didn’t go to college even to school!! But in practical they are famous worldwide for their wisdom and outstanding works & contributions to the world. As for example, Einstein was disqualified in his school, Alexander Graham Bell was not academically good, Mary Shelley did never go to college, Jesus Christ, Muhammad (SM), and Gautama Buddha who had really the wisdom learnt from nature, society and through self-development. Secondly, an institutional education can give a concept but practical and implementing education doesn’t need a school. Life teaches one practically by the organs like society, family, religion, nature etc. Thirdly, Quality teaching methods are very diverse either in nature or in function. And, it demands practical (functional) activities. So role of professors, of department, of college, of university is not conclusive. State is responsible here to ensure supportive materials like environment, ethical & accountability standard, and approaches towards the people in order to ascertain the real education. So these are more important than almost everything taught in college as without these institutional education goes in vain