Preview

Two Types Of Ideologies In The United States

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
503 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Two Types Of Ideologies In The United States
There are two types of ideologies in economy; i.e., mixed/progressive economy and conservative/Randian thinking ideology. Like in other advanced democratic countries, the U.S. also has what economists call mixed economy. In a mixed economy, the public and private sector contribute to the growth of the economy. In a progressive ideology, the government makes contracts with arms dealerships which allows them to get new weapons for the soldiers or police. A mixed economy is able to create new jobs for people, which increase social security and taxes. Through taxes the government is able to create highways and other projects. On the other hand, the people prefer the conservative ideology because they have the freedom to do whatever they want …show more content…

When the G.I. Bill got passed, it allowed U.S. soldiers to fight in a war and come back to get an education for free. Due to this bill, many people began wanting to fight in the war because of free tuitions in college. Some of the money went to building projects to help improve a place. President Wilson established the Federal Reserve Act, was a way to make sure that the economy would be stable by introducing the Central Bank. By passing this act, it will be able to fix the United States economic problems if things do go wrong. While, Ayn Rand is a supporter of Randian thinking, she was an author of a book and wrote about how the government should have a less role in the economy. She wanted to lower taxes and cut government spending. Ayn believed that the government should have less involvement with the economy. She believes that the people should have the freedom to do whatever they want to do with their money. Another person that followed Randian thinking was President Reagan. He too believed that the people should have the freedom to do whatever they want. He also believed that the government should have less participation in the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    JFK's New Frontier laid the foundation for the greatest growth in government welfare and regulatory agencies since the New Deal. Indeed, the 1960s began an era of increased government handouts and government spending that locked people into poverty as they became more dependent on government money while losing any incentive to find work for themselves. Moreover, increased government spending resulted in higher taxes for millions of employed Americans, eroding the economic security of the American family. With less money to spend, save, and invest, the economy suffered and ordinary Americans became more susceptible to politicians who preyed on economic insecurity by proposing welfare programs for the middle class as well as the poor. In this way, politicians literally bought the votes of millions of Americans. As the number of welfare programs increased, politicians were reluctant to continue raising taxes for fear that they would not be reelected. Thus, the government began to run large deficits, spending more money than it was taking in. By selling bonds, known as Treasury Bills, the government began a huge borrowing program in which it borrowed money from the American people in order to fund its expenses. In the past, such borrowing had been used to pay for needed internal improvements or national defense, but now this money went to welfare programs. By the mid-1960s, the government would be operating on credit. In addition, the Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve System encouraged the creation of more money. In effect, paper dollars were printed that were not backed by adequate goods and services. Ever since the United States went off the gold standard in 1933, the government has been able to create such excess money, leading to the problem of inflation. By living beyond its means, borrowing large amounts of money, foolishly expanding credit, and printing excess money, the government created a false…

    • 309 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ayn Rand believes in the First Amendment but doesn’t believe in a two party system (15). The First Amendment states freedom of speech, freedom of press, freedom of religion, and the right to assemble. A two party system is closely similar to the United States with our Republicans and Democrats. A one party system would be closely similar to North Korea and their leader, Kim Jong-un. Obviously the one law she would have to agree upon is the First Amendment considering that it contains the basic freedoms (i.e. speech, press). Ayn Rand would disagree with how the US Constitution was made considering that a two party system was originated from it (Federalists v. Anti-Federalists or Republicans v. Democrats). You can tell that she has these sort…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Simple suspicion and a clash of political ideology led to the first division within a united party. This party was originally united under one common cause- the freedom of a new and growing nation. However, as the nation began to spread its wings, conflicts arose and the two parties separated from one. This split was inevitable because of the contradicting ideologies each founding "brother" fought to uphold. Each had a different idea, each had a different vision, and each sought to make his vision a reality. Although the seeds of discontent were sown early on, they began to sprout during the process of the ratification of the constitution. The seeds began to grow as issue after issue came and fertilized the growing plant of division. Eventually,…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    | The economic history of the United States has its roots in European colonization in the 16th, 17th, and 18th centuries. Marginal colonial economies grew into 13 small, independent farming economies, which joined together in 1776 to form the United States of America. In 230 years the United States grew to a huge, integrated, industrialized economy that makes up nearly a quarter of the world economy. The main causes were a large unified market, a supportive political-legal system, vast areas of highly productive farmlands, vast natural resources (especially timber, coal, iron, and oil), and an entrepreneurial spirit and commitment to investing in material and human capital. The economy has maintained high wages,…

    • 1578 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Does democracy require equality of income and wealth? Does majority rule undermine freedom and threaten individual rights? What was James Madison's view, and what is your reaction?…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the state of Texas, there are many political problems, and they all revolve around one central idea. In Texas's case, some bases of their politics are a mixture between classical liberalism, social conservatism, and populism ("Political Culture and Political Ideology in Texas"). Classical liberalism consists of "doing your own thing", and is elaborated as political freedom as well as civil liberty independence ("Political Culture and Political Ideology in Texas"). Social conservatism is based on the traditional way of doing things, which explains why the Republican Party has had the majority vote, since Texas has always been historically Republicans ("Political Culture and Political Ideology…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the United States there are numerous events that have contributed to the people's views on the philosophies that have been brought up. The first philosophy was Puritanism and it was created to ensure that people were doing God’s work and dedicating their lives to him. Centuries later the popular philosophy of deism was followed and it made people aware that logic and reasoning were present in the environment. Transcendentalism arose in the 19th century which soon turned people into more self-reliant humans. Throughout the major literary philosophies in the United States, one can see how the role of a superior being shifts from very powerful to a more subtle and personal connection.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The delineations of the words "liberal" and "conservative" shifted at the start of the Great Depression. Although laissez-faire policy was thought to be liberal in the Roaring 20's, the year 1929 quickly changed America's idea of liberalism entirely. The hardnosed Franklin Delano Roosevelt and the saavy Herbert Hoover both believed they alone could improve America's economic depression. Their political standings have been wholly analyzed, and although the two men did express ideas which were contradictory to their original political standpoints, one possessed more liberal ideas by wanting to change the government, versus more conservative ideas; wanting to keep the government as it was.…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Yin and Yang of American Culture: A Paradox by Eun Y. Kim is a perspective of the American way of life by a Korean American. Kim uses the yin and yang symbol to describe the positive and negatives of American culture and how it compares to Asian culture. Kim’s exposure to American culture as a young child in Korea and immigrating to the United States while also being raised in a Korean household where Korean tradition was upheld provides a solid basis for her analysis. I have chosen five of her yang statements for discussion which I believe I have experienced being a fourth generation American but also witnessing the truth to these statements during my travels to Asia as well as to Portugal.…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “American System was a program for economic development (McNamara, R. 2012).” With the way that America was changing you had a younger generation that was eager for change as well. American politicians had gained a better trust from the people. Henry Clay and John Calhoun two Democratic-Republicans had embraced Jefferson’s vision for a small federal government. “Together, they advanced a vision that the federal government should encourage economic enterprise by internal improvements, develop a secure economic institution, and provide for the security of America’s economic interests (www.betheluniversityonline.net, 2012).” Internal improvements would be the building of roads and canals. Congress refused to help the First National Bank before the war it caused many banks to be created. These various banks created their own currency and credit, which caused lots of problems. Part of the American System was the creation of the Second Bank of the United States. “Calhoun and Clay also supervised the passage of the Tariff of 1816, which taxed all incoming goods at the stiff rate of 25 percent (www.betheluniversityonline.net, 2012).” This would limit the amount of foreign goods coming to the United states and encourage growth and development within America.…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Soil of Democracy

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The economy is an important factor of a government. Since the U.S has a government, like Abe Lincoln said, “...of the people, by the people, for the people...”having an economy that all are happy and supportive of makes it easier for a government to do what it was put into place to do and stay in power over the issues that everyday citizens should not have to deal with.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Anti-Federalist viewpoint is valid, and should be considered seriously. Their ideas on federalism and the Constitution were similar to the Federalists, but the Anti-Federalists wanted to add more precautions to the Constitution, and were especially careful about preventing tyranny from happening within the states. The Anti-Federalists were focussed on individual rights, and wanted the states to have a high power in the government. Each state at the time was vital for the growth of the United States, as it is today. Their pressing for the Bill of Rights was extremely important then, and equally important in this modern age. This is why the Anti-Federalist view should come to light to the people of the United States.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mendes, Errol. "The Cost of Non-intervention in Syria." The Cost of Non-intervention in Syria. Ottawa Citizen, 26 Aug. 2013. Web. 27 Oct. 2013.…

    • 1751 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Democratic egalitarianism and individualism and how hypocritical society is in regards to the two are the subject matter of this essay. Various notable philosophers and authors have dissected these terms and their meanings relative to human life and society many times in the past. It is obvious to most how democratic egalitarianism and individualism can contradictory in many ways. The complexity of the two is not readily abundant due to examining the values of an American society. In society, these values do not hold up to the true meanings of democratic egalitarianism and individualism.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    bipul kumar roy

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Second, there is probably not full information. Look at the financial turmoil that is occurring right now. Part of the problem is that banks were not able to distinguish between good and poor risks, borrowers did not fully understand the mortgages that they took out, and investors cannot tell which banks are good and which are suspect. Again, this is an argument for government intervention. Free market economies stimulate economic growth in whatever the market seems to profitably want at the time (like pet rocks or pink yard flamingos) not necessarily what will benefit it (as the long-term general welfare of the economy). State directed economies would stifle the growth in pet rocks and pink yard flamingos because these are a waste of limited resources. The state would stimulate growth in something more immediately useful; like the production of war materiel in the US during WWII, or schools or infrastructure. Federal spending (state induced growth) pulled the U.S. out of the depression. The free market had failed…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays