Hamlet is a famous Shakespearean play and also boasts major popularity as an English literature text. The text was written early in the 17th century (being performed in 1603) and its ability to last the test of time is solely due to the universal themes that Shakespeare has infused it with. These universal themes include repentance, revenge and madness or more precisely feigned madness. In this essay context, techniques, critical analysis and these key universal themes will be described so that the timelessness of Hamlet can be recognised and understood.
The play Hamlet is a revenge tragedy that was written during the Elizabethan era where Christianity was cemented in the people’s culture. A revenge tragedy depicts the journey of a central figure as they seek vengeance; a fatal flaw often complicates their journey towards vengeance and becomes the cause of the characters’ end, usually occurring shortly after the character completes the act of revenge. The character of Hamlet links to the context of the time as at the time, the uprising of the Renaissance Humanist movement was occurring and Shakespeare uses this as he portrays Hamlets character as an intelligent humanist.
One of the universal themes that Hamlet includes is gaining repentance for sin; this is a major scene in the play that which is most evident in Act 3, Scene 3. In this scene we see Claudius desperately trying to attain some salvation over the rush of guilt that Hamlet’s play has placed upon him because of the crime he committed – “a brother’s murder”. The strong use of imagery and personification highlights Claudius great level of struggle that he is undergoing due to his crime “Oh my offence is rank...” and the metaphor he finishes the sentence with “... it smells to heaven”. At this point Hamlet has found Claudius, yet still struggles to kill him as he does not believe that Claudius deserves to be sent to heaven for being killed while he is in prayer. This is an important scene as it contrasts with the scene where Hamlet impulsively kills Polonius and finally when the revenge he takes on Claudius is also a spontaneous action.
Hamlet’s soliloquy in this scene provides dramatic irony and also a display of Hamlet’s tragic flaw which is his intellectual ability rendering him incapable of acting spontaneously. The dramatic irony is present in Hamlet’s soliloquy as he decides not to kill Claudius while he is praying; however Claudius prayers are in vain as he states that he is unable to repent. “My words fly up, my thoughts remain below. Words without thoughts never to heaven go”. Hamlet’s tragic flaw in this scene leaves the reader doubting that Hamlet is capable of avenging his father, although it is known in a revenge tragedy that revenge is only accomplished shortly before the hero’s demise. This comes in accordance to the natural order of God which is formerly known as the chain of being, when a king is slain, many must meet their demise for the world to be resolved allowing living to return to normal.
In Act 5, Scene 2, Hamlet shows his respect and forgiveness of Laertes “But I am very sorry, good Horatio, that to Laertes I forgot myself.” Even though they both ended up fighting to the death they were at peace with one another and had each gained forgiveness. This suggests that these characters were able to attain salvation as each of their deaths were peaceful, this contrasts with Claudius appeal for forgiveness in Act 3, Scene 3, as we know that it was in vain. Claudius death was displayed as violent and absent from peace which suggests that Claudius did not receive salvation. This contrast depicts a good versus evil situation as it suggests that those who are good receive peace in death and therefore ultimately receive salvation, in comparison to the evil who receive pain and violence in death which reflects their eternity.
The next theme I’ll analyse is feigned madness which is most evident in Act 3, Scene 1. In this scene Hamlet begins to converse with Ophelia using terms of great affection and imagery “The fair Ophelia. --Nymph in thy orisons.” This contrasts strongly with the terms of animosity which he uses towards Ophelia later in the scene. “You should have not believed me, for virtue cannot so inoculate our old stock but we shall relish of it. I loved you not.” This contrast provides evidence for Hamlet’s mental instability or ‘madness’. The scene ends with Ophelia’s soliloquy, within this soliloquy she doubles her sentences “Th’observed of all observers, quite, quite down” “T’have seen what I have seen, see what I see.” This doubling within her sentences is used to create emphasis to the pain she felt when witnessing Hamlet’s madness due to his state of mental instability “Oh what a noble mind is here o’erthrown.”
In Act 2, Scene 2, Hamlet tells his old friends Guildenstern and Rosencrantz that he is feigning madness. “You are welcome but my uncle-father and aunt-mother are deceived.” “I am but mad north-north-west. When the wind is southerly, I know a hawk from a handsaw.” This is an unexpected and odd admittance as earlier in the scene Hamlet had suspicions that these two were involved in the plot against him. “Nay then I have an eye of you. –If you love me, hold not off.”
The excerpts from these two scenes make it evident that Hamlet is not legitimately mad and is instead using madness as a ploy to trouble those against him. Hamlet is portrayed as partially paranoid as he is accusing his old friends and using madness to confuse the girl he loves, however there is good reason for his paranoia as in both situations he was being played. It can be suggested that this is reason for his tragic flaw of delayed action due to over thinking as he has few people he can trust and therefore feels the need to research his own answers. He also used his feigned madness tactically as he used it to put on a suspicious play that unveiled Claudius secret and was proof to Hamlet that he was guilty/ worthy of revenge.
The final theme is central to a revenge tragedy, and like many other Shakespearean tragedies the revenge is delayed. The concept of revenge is most evident in Hamlet’s second soliloquy in Act 2, Scene 2, where he states that he was “Prompted to my revenge by heaven and hell.” This line is the reason that Hamlet does not seek revenge immediately as he was unsure if the ghost of old Hamlet was a conjuration of the underworld or not and in part if old Hamlet provided valid information. This idea also returns in Act 3, Scene 3, where Claudius is praying, Hamlet decides to delay his revenge so that he doesn’t attenuate Claudius’ fate and send him to heaven rather than hell. Through this task of avenging his father Hamlet assesses all components, as he is struggling with thoughts of killing for honour yet not killing as a Christian. Hamlet struggles with this dilemma up to the final scene where he is able to resolve it because two more factors occurred, self-defence as the king has had Hamlet poisoned and to amend another wrong.
Hamlet struggles with his own understanding and who is trustworthy due to this great task laid upon him. This suggests that although personal battles are difficult a task or battle in the name of someone else is often massive in comparison.
I feel that the universal themes discussed in this essay as well as others that weren’t discussed are central to the timelessness of Hamlet. Through analysing these themes in key scenes i have gained a greater understanding of Hamlet’s character and i feel the reader makes connections to Hamlet because of his humanistic nature and traits. This connection between character and audience as well as Shakespeare’s representation of the context of the time through the character Hamlet engage the reader in Hamlets journey towards the Elizabethan theme of morality in obeying God’s natural order. A modern audience has less confrontation with the issues of sin and death however the moral values and the values of life present in Hamlet are still applicable. Hamlet’s ability to convey moral and textual principles with a Christian based humanism character persevered its popularity through to modern society.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Shakespeare’s play The Tragedy of Hamlet explores humanities complex processes and the condition of which we live. In this play, the concept of revenge is studied cohesively with the ability of humans to make judgments over their actions and human’s curiosity toward seeking answers. Shakespeare, having written this play in the 17th century, creates the protagonist Hamlet as a forward thinking character with a philosophical quality and moral understanding regarding his ability to reason. These traits conflict against the crude revenge task at hand in the play. Through Hamlet’s complexity, Shakespeare makes direct opinions about the human condition and what it is to be human.…
- 968 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Time and time again, we as a complex society have recognized in many pieces of great literature the idea of man and revenge. Throughout history, the idea of vengeance has destroyed large communities, populations and entire civilizations. The problem with man and revenge is that one may be side-tracted of why or whom he is avenging. This similar idea is conveyed in the theme of Shakespear's Hamlet , "Vengeance can confuse a man's mind and soul to the point where he may not be sure of whom he is really avenging." Shakespear uses foils in this play to allow us readers to understand Hamlet as a man and why and whom he is really avenging, and Laertes and the ghost are foils for Hamlet in this play which help us readers understand his character and his actions.…
- 850 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Any critical evaluation of the play “Hamlet” must be chiefly concerned with the character of Hamlet. Unlike Shakespeare’s other tragedies, “Hamlet” is singular in purpose and scope-it is the story of one man’s personal and moral collapse under the weight of his own (and other’s) decisions, intentions and machinations. The play is not complicated with subplots and extraneous secondary characters, but is wholly focused on the man himself. This dedication to a singular dramatic intention paradoxically makes for “Hamlet” to be, subjectively, Shakespeare most confusing play. It is problematic in its protagonists’ inscrutability, his missing motives, his contradictory actions, and his utter implacability to settle into one stable character. Almost everything he does further contradicts him as an individual in the world of the play and as a dramatic character. For this reason my critical evaluation of the play is that it is artistically self defeating due to its own subversions of character and dramatic convention, and this should render it unfulfilling and disappointing as a dramatic performance. Paradoxically, the plays confusion renders it all the more infuriatingly readable-it is both alienating and enticing, a work which defeats itself in its own realisation and at the same time is only worthwhile and meaningful in this artistic enigma-the individual components should not work, yet it does strike a powerful emotional and dramatic resonance in its completion. Many aspects of “Hamlet” as a text are easily criticised-it is certainly a work with a large amount of problems. However, in a rather subversive and mysterious manner the play is a wonderful work of literature.…
- 1441 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Shakespeare’s play Hamlet (1601) explores Hamlet’s growing insecurities and uncertainties, which stem from his attempt to find certainty and order within his changing transitioning society. Hamlet’s strong moral code and genuine grief at the beginning of the play contrasts with his descent into madness and deceit, as the corruption of the court begin to deteriorate his integrity and eventually lead to his tragic downfall. Throughout the play Shakespeare explores universal notions of authenticity contrasted with duplicity, the struggle between action and inaction and challenging the archetypal tragedian. Through an exploration of these themes, Shakespeare attempts to use the characters in his play to reflect his view on humanity and the shifting, conflicting paradigms between Medieval and Renaissance thinking.…
- 1175 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Hamlet, Prince of Denmark has remained the most perplexing, as well as the most popular, of William Shakespeare’s tragedies. Whether considered as literature, philosophy, or drama, its artistic stature is universally admitted. To explain the reasons for its excellence in a few words, however, is a daunting task. Apart from the matchless artistry of its language, the play’s appeal rests in large measure on the character of Hamlet himself. Called upon to avenge his father’s murder, he is compelled to face problems of duty, morality, and ethics that have been human concerns through the ages. The play has tantalized critics with what has become known as the Hamlet mystery, that of Hamlet’s complex behavior, most notably his indecision and his reluctance to act.…
- 1773 Words
- 8 Pages
Best Essays -
the proof must come from the text of Hamlet and cited in text and on the Works…
- 393 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Shakespeare's 'Hamlet' remains at the pinnacle of high culture texts and the cannon as one of the most iconic texts in the modern world. 'Hamlet' is a deeply philosophical in which grapples with metaphysical questions- existential in nature that underpins the human ethos. It is through the highly charged language, textual integrity and use of meta-theatrical techniques that ensure the play's modernity and continuing resonance in society through multiple perspectives.…
- 1055 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark, William Shakespeare’s longest, and perhaps most notable, play explores several important aspects of the human condition. Hamlet’s battle between his emotions and logic, as well as his fatal flaws and what he considers to be morally good and looming evil, encased in a story of murder and betrayal enlightens audiences to contemplate the true meaning of being human. Ultimately, through Hamlet’s questioning of humanity and what it means to be alive and human, Shakespeare prompts the conversation in his audience.…
- 943 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Hamlet is generally regarded as Shakespeare’s magnum opus, sometimes it is even referred as the highest literary product of human genius. Critics have always been argued on the interpretation of Hamlet and even after more than 400 years, yet these argues still going strong. One of the most controversial that topic for critics since the beginning is the interpretation of the third act of Hamlet, where many critics themselves baffle because normal interpretations will make Hamlet subsequent actions irrational and impossible to explain. Many will use insanity to explain Hamlet actions. However, we will presume that Hamlet is staying sane throughout the course of the story. This paper is an attempt at interpreting the purpose and significant of…
- 1409 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
William Shakespeare, regarded as one of the greatest English playwrights of all time, crafted Hamlet, a masterpiece that unravels a corrupt royal family. As the play opens with the death of the Denmark king, the audience is thrown into a world of power and betrayal. Prince Hamlet’s discovery of his father’s murder sets the stage for a creative and engaging story delving into the intricacies of revenge. In Hamlet, William Shakespeare uses the motif of revenge to convey the complexities of human nature rooted in internal conflicts, demonstrating the dangers of revenge. Hamlet’s journey for revenge leads him down an emotionally and internally difficult path swamped in moral dilemmas as he faces the consequences of revenge and the inevitability…
- 1723 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Shakespeare’s revenge tragedy Hamlet was composed in the early 17th century Elizabethan Era, reflecting this society’s preoccupation with retribution and vengeance. It explores key concerns and concepts of everlasting relevance to audiences of all ages. The tragic hero Hamlet is intensely human and his struggles are familiar to all audiences. He educates the audience via vicarious learning, sharing his experiences as he explores fundamental issues of morality and mortality through his intense interactions with the lead female characters. Key concerns that are the driving forces in Hamlet include: deception and revenge. These overarching concerns help the audience to understand the prevarications and motivations of Hamlet, along with the multifaceted relationships between Hamlet, Ophelia, Gertrude and Claudius.…
- 726 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
In using the conventions of the revenge tragedy genre, expectations are created for an audience who understand the conflict that looms under Claudius’s leadership unless Hamlet revenges his father’s ‘most foul and unnatural murder’. Yet Hamlet is conflicted over the moral dilemma that confronts him, expressing this through his Judeo Christian perspective of ‘O cursed spite that ever I was born to set it right’. His powerful use of soliloquy throughout the play explores the paradigm shift between Renaissance and Judeo-Christian ideas on life and life after death. ‘To be or not to be...’ asks Hamlet, reflecting the philosophical existential concerns of this context and supporting the plays longevity for these paramount concerns remain relevant to every context. Here Shakespeare has successfully mirrored the ferment and change in his society, whilst modern directors mirror theirs in ways that reflect their values and beliefs. It is for this reason that Shakespeare’s work is described as ‘not of an age, but for all time’ (Ben Johnson).…
- 948 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
A revenge tragedy was a popular form of writing during the Elizabethan age, in this form of writing the main character is directed by a ghost of his murdered father or son and the ghost inflicts retaliation, amongst a powerful villain. Revenge tragedies usually include the following; violence, bizarre criminal acts, insanity, a hesitant protagonist, and the use of soliloquy. Thus Hamlet becomes a Revenge of Tragedy it follows all the guidelines and in some cases go above and beyond.…
- 1137 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
In The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark Shakespeare uses personification, allusion, and a rhetorical question to advocate that the climatic moment of Act III is when King Claudius admits to the murder of King Hamlet because, by definition, it is the act that turns the action of the scene around, leading toward an inevitable conclusion. Shakespeare uses personification when King Claudius says that “[his] offense is rank, it smells to heaven” (line 36). Claudius’ guilt of killing his very own brother, King Hamlet, is constantly on his conscious, which is why he gives the “offense” the trait of a rank smell, something whose presence is constant and putrid. The purpose of personifying Claudius’ “offense” to have a smell that reaches to heaven is because Claudius is aware that heaven is where King Hamlet’s spirit lies due to his own fault, and his admit to the murder will drive the scene to an inevitable conclusion because he has released key information to a driving mystery in the plot line. Shakespeare makes a biblical allusion to Abel and Cain in lines 37-38 of the play when Claudius says that his “offense […] hath the primal eldest curse upon’t, / A brother’s murder!”. Shakespeare is atoning that murder is never outdated; no matter the era or the place, the murder of a brother by a brother is never acceptable in the eyes of society or God. This allusion purposefully informs us that King Claudius did kill his brother, King Hamlet, as a warning that falling action concerning Claudius’ unforgivable acts is to proceed. Claudius rhetorically asks, “O, what form of prayer / Can serve my turn?” (lines 51-52).Claudius’ asks this with the knowledge that there is no form of prayer that would serve his turn because his acts were unforgivable and he must face the consequences for them. Rhetorical questions are always immediately answered, whether directly or indirectly, and King Claudius’ question is consequently to be answered via the falling action that is to proceed…
- 380 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Hamlet was written in 1601, a time when society was changing from the old feudal society, a society where the King held absolute control, affecting everybody and everything beneath him. Throughout Hamlet, the effects a corrupt King has upon his kingdom are portrayed. These changes foreshadow 17th century England and as such, the play is a metaphor for chaos witnessed in countries during times of extraordinary change. Notwithstanding this, the play is equally relevant toward a changing state today, as it was during Shakespearean England. Hamlet is the only constant character who defies decay, degeneration and maintains his integrity until the end. Hamlet, faced by corruption everywhere, enters the play a boy but exits a man.…
- 2116 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays