Use Of Propaganda In Loncraine's Richard III
Loncraine's 1995 film of Shakespeare's Richard III play, while considerably altered to fit in with the context of the industrial 1930's timeframe, still retains the values and themes of Shakespeare's Richard III play such as Richard's rampant thirst for power, the familiar good versus evil theme and influence of persuasive language, otherwise known as propaganda. Richard is portrayed as a Hitler figure in the film using similar colours and uniform to the Nazis.
The key distinction between the two texts is the era the contexts were based on. While Shakespeare's original play was set in the 16th century when superstition served a major role in the resolution of the play, Loncraine's film was set in the jazzy, industrial 1930's. The 1930's era was emphasised in the duration of the entire film by using technology such as the telegram, costuming, setting, weaponry and most importantly, the non-diagetic jazz music applied.
In the ballroom the song, "Come with me and be my Love" by Christopher Marlow is used as dramatic irony as Richard admits that he is incapable of courting or loving a woman when he declares in a soliloquy "since I cannot prove a lover, I am determined to prove a …show more content…
villain". This statement is later ironically proved false, as he woos and marries Anne in less than a week after he murders her husband.
Animal imagery is continuously applied throughout the entirety of both the film and play to make Richard seem subhuman.
Richard is shown as a despicable, deformed man and is described as a "bottled spider", "poisonous bunch backed toad" and "abortive rooting hog". In particular, the metaphorical animal imagery of the boar is used as the boar was seen as a dangerous animal during the Middle Ages and Renaissance. People from the Shakespearian age would have perceived the boar as vicious and wild. Stanley's dream of Richard snarling at him in the guise of a boar is symbolistic of the danger threatening him because of Richard's greed. The scene with the spider crawling over Lady Anne's face as she sits there, oblivious, shows that Richard murders Anne suddenly and without her
realising.
Another distinguishing contrast is in the scene of the play where Richard is haunted by the ghosts. Shakespeare integrated the ghost scene where the people he killed cursed Richard to "despair and die" while blessing Richmond to "live and flourish" to collaborate with the superstitions of the 16th century, while the Loncraine film portrays the scene as Richard being haunted by his subconscious rather than the ghosts to complement the beliefs of the 1930's. The alliteration in the curse the ghosts brought upon him emphasises the position Richard is in. Queen Margaret is not brought forward in the Loncraine film as opposed to the Shakespeare play because the superstition theme is not brought out strongly.
The main alteration in the script is the reassignment of many other character's parts to Queen Elizabeth as she holds a major part in the Loncraine film to correct some of the flaws in Richard's character in the Shakespeare play. However, the similarity is that the style of language used in the film concedes with the language used in play.
Richard frequently manipulates other characters using clever techniques such as asides, puns and double entendres. One such example of this is when he greets his brother "I will deliver you, or else lie for you". It is depicted as a double entendre as his brother is easily deceived thinking that Richard will help release him, but only the audience is aware of the real connotation, meaning Richard will have him killed.
In the last scene, the outcomes are different whereas in the play, Richard valiantly fights until death crying out "a horse! My kingdom for a horse!" the film portrays Richard as cowardly as he commits suicide by falling off a building into the flames below. The flames allude to hell as Richard himself is portrayed as a parallel of Satan as he plummets into the inferno below.
Although the Loncraine film has been dramatically changed to suit the ideology of the modern era, it still preserves the main ideas and themes of Shakespeare's play. This ensures that while it still has the same values, the audience will be able to relate to the film as an entertaining, appealing text.
The key distinction between the two texts is the era the contexts were based on. While Shakespeare's original play was set in the 16th century when superstition served a major role in the resolution of the play, Loncraine's film was set in the jazzy, industrial 1930's. The 1930's era was emphasised in the duration of the entire film by using technology such as the telegram, costuming, setting, weaponry and most importantly, the non-diagetic jazz music applied.
In the ballroom the song, "Come with me and be my Love" by Christopher Marlow is used as dramatic irony as Richard admits that he is incapable of courting or loving a woman when he declares in a soliloquy "since I cannot prove a lover, I am determined to prove a …show more content…
villain". This statement is later ironically proved false, as he woos and marries Anne in less than a week after he murders her husband.
Animal imagery is continuously applied throughout the entirety of both the film and play to make Richard seem subhuman.
Richard is shown as a despicable, deformed man and is described as a "bottled spider", "poisonous bunch backed toad" and "abortive rooting hog". In particular, the metaphorical animal imagery of the boar is used as the boar was seen as a dangerous animal during the Middle Ages and Renaissance. People from the Shakespearian age would have perceived the boar as vicious and wild. Stanley's dream of Richard snarling at him in the guise of a boar is symbolistic of the danger threatening him because of Richard's greed. The scene with the spider crawling over Lady Anne's face as she sits there, oblivious, shows that Richard murders Anne suddenly and without her
realising.
Another distinguishing contrast is in the scene of the play where Richard is haunted by the ghosts. Shakespeare integrated the ghost scene where the people he killed cursed Richard to "despair and die" while blessing Richmond to "live and flourish" to collaborate with the superstitions of the 16th century, while the Loncraine film portrays the scene as Richard being haunted by his subconscious rather than the ghosts to complement the beliefs of the 1930's. The alliteration in the curse the ghosts brought upon him emphasises the position Richard is in. Queen Margaret is not brought forward in the Loncraine film as opposed to the Shakespeare play because the superstition theme is not brought out strongly.
The main alteration in the script is the reassignment of many other character's parts to Queen Elizabeth as she holds a major part in the Loncraine film to correct some of the flaws in Richard's character in the Shakespeare play. However, the similarity is that the style of language used in the film concedes with the language used in play.
Richard frequently manipulates other characters using clever techniques such as asides, puns and double entendres. One such example of this is when he greets his brother "I will deliver you, or else lie for you". It is depicted as a double entendre as his brother is easily deceived thinking that Richard will help release him, but only the audience is aware of the real connotation, meaning Richard will have him killed.
In the last scene, the outcomes are different whereas in the play, Richard valiantly fights until death crying out "a horse! My kingdom for a horse!" the film portrays Richard as cowardly as he commits suicide by falling off a building into the flames below. The flames allude to hell as Richard himself is portrayed as a parallel of Satan as he plummets into the inferno below.
Although the Loncraine film has been dramatically changed to suit the ideology of the modern era, it still preserves the main ideas and themes of Shakespeare's play. This ensures that while it still has the same values, the audience will be able to relate to the film as an entertaining, appealing text.