Preview

Use Sources 4, 5 and 6 and your own knowledge. Do you agree with the view that Indian desires for independence from Britain were caused mainly by the impact of the First World War?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
656 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Use Sources 4, 5 and 6 and your own knowledge. Do you agree with the view that Indian desires for independence from Britain were caused mainly by the impact of the First World War?
Use Sources 4, 5 and 6 and your own knowledge. Do you agree with the view that Indian desires for independence from Britain were caused mainly by the impact of the First World War?

Before the First World War, there was little influence on the Indians desire for independence from the British. Analysing the three sources it can be indicated that the impact of the First World War was the main trigger placing these desires and strengthening them. However they tend to disagree to some extent and also are of different Nature, Origin and Purpose which can undermine their reliability.

The provenance of the sources can play a big part as to whether or not it is reliable to judge whether Indian desires for independence from Britain were caused by the impact of the First World War. Both sources 4 and 6 are secondary sources, written many years after the 1st world war. Therefore they may be seen as slightly much more reliable as they are able to use benefit of hindsight, whereby they can research and weigh out the evidence and facts found until a judgement is reached. The benefit of hindsight also suggests that they are less likely to be influenced by the events happening at the time, so instead of placing a snapshot it provides a broad overview. Also as both sources are by historians and also published stories, they are much more reliable as a historian would have researched the top before putting forward their view and as it is a published piece there must be some line of truth behind it or facts which support the views proposed. Source 5 is a little different when compared to source 4 and 6; however this does not necessarily mean that it is any less reliable of a source. Source 6 is a primary source which is useful to an extent as it gives insight as to the events of the time; however they can also be slightly unreliable as they may be influenced by feeling and other events of the time. Also as it is by ‘Gandhi’ who was part of the congress and also Indian there is an

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    After World War I, many British colonies were ruling India, angering the natives and causing a sense of nationalism. Mahatma Gandhi took the matter into his own hands, using a surprising way to promote and fight for independence. Instead of being like many other revolutions and creating much…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One view presented by the sources is that Indians did not like the British rule. The theme of hostility is presented in Source 11, where Gandhi writes in 1920 that the British are “evilly manned”, using strong words such as “dishonest” and “unscrupulous”, suggesting strong feelings of hostility towards British rule, as Gandhi feels as though the British are almost cheating the Indian people “with no regard to the wishes of the Indian people”, meaning the British are doing what they want without consulting the people they are ruling over. This source shows that the hostility felt by Indians was in fact widespread because it is written by Gandhi, a man who represented and was supported by a variety of people from all classes. This theme of hostility towards British is corroborated in Source 10 where the British are described as “irresponsible” and, like in Source 11, the Indians feel their “rights of human beings are being denied”, showing that the Indians again felt that the British were doing as they pleased without Indian voices being heard. However, as the source is written by Motilal Nehru, leader of the INC, it is difficult to say from this source that hostility was in fact widespread – Nehru only represents the INC which has the high caste community as a significant majority, and as it is written in 1919, we cannot be sure if the hostility was long-lasting as it is the same year as the massacre itself.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    British imperialism had a negative impact on the politics of India because the justice system was biased toward Indians and that the government had more white…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With many politicians believing the British were civilising the peoples of periphery, the British probably believed the peoples of the American colonies needed to be taught to respect the metropole, which believed it had a parent role. In contrast, in the Indian case acts of resistance had yield some success. It could, however, be argued that the war a make factor in this success. As Fieldhouse points out: Stafford Cripps promised India dominion status ‘to rally Indian opinion in the crisis caused by Japan’s entry into the war’ (Secondary Source 19.2, 2015, p.10). As well as the civil disobedience, which was part of the ‘Quit India’ campaign, the British were also concerned about the Japanese-back ‘Indian National Army’ who had have some military success. In this context, then, the British high likely perceived those whom taken in the civil disobedience as moderates. As Indian support was needed to fight Japan, the British probably felt placating moderates was a small price to pay considering the circumstances. Therefore, the circumstances of war played in a major factor in Indian progress towards…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    We find out much about British rule in India from the outbreak of fighting of the mutiny before 1857 as it tells us about how the East India Company forced strict rules and intervened upon the Hindu society such as ignoring their religious beliefs, which was one of the key factors leading up to the Indian ‘mutiny’. We see that although some changes did benefit from the Indians, the general attitude was negative, since all Indians were heavily taxed as discriminated. The way Britain changed from a trader to a ruler reveals to us how greedy Britain were at the time and how powerful as they could gain control of such a big country like India. We also can see how the British abused their power as they treated the Indians unfairly, as, in an account written by Vishnubhat Godse, an Indian who was living in the city of Jhansi in 1857, described how they British took…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Traditional Chinese civilization were able to support themselves, but regulated trade under the Qing Dynasty…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Glt-1 Analysis

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages

    India. In 1947, India gained its independence as a result of a non violent resistance led by Gandhi and Nehru. (CIA) Although India received its independence from Britain, the social changes that…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    By European principles in the political area being brought to India by the British, political and social reform in India was able to be achieved. The western education led to Indians coming across European principles (human rights, freedom of speech, liberalism, etc.) That was a contrast though to the imperialism practiced by the British in India. One third of the subcontinent was ruled by Indian princes, but under the supervision of the British. The rest were controlled by the Viceroy (administered by roughly one thousand members of the civil service). So the knowledge of principles such as autonomy and freedom led to many Indians wanting the same thing for their own nation since it appeared to them that the world's most powerful nations were those who were self-governing democracies which was obviously a successful system. Part of their desires also came from the Indians wanting their native religion and customs to be respected.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Not everybody was happy under British rule. The British limited Indian power and took away freedoms. Change was forced upon them. The British exploited Indian pluralism, resulting in religious conflict between Hindus and Muslims. Factories that posed a threat to British trade would be closed down to avoid competition. Local hand-made clothes were destroyed and finish goods using Indian raw material would be resold in India. The Indians could only trade with the British. When the Indians finally realized that the British would never see Indians as equals, no matter how Europeanized they became, they realized that they had to kick them out. However, try as they might, the British were simply too strong for a disconnected India. With ease, the British could take out ten times as many Indians in battle. Even after defeat, sepoys would suffer even more humiliation and abuse from the British. Indians felt a surge of nationalism. They resent their second-class status in their own countries, which leads us to today. Nationalist groups emerged. The Hindu Indian National Congress, which is later joined by the Muslim League encourage the Indians to take pride in their history and products. Millions of people are joining this movement and are fighting for…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Have you ever heard of a country invading another country, but not settling? Well, that’s exactly what happened when the British started trading with India. They British's method left little room for error as they took control of India, it's military, it's material, and its land. It was only after 200 years that India tried break free from the British rule. India demanded independence because, they were forced to fight in a war for democracy and they were not granted their own freedom.…

    • 1007 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Sepoy Rebellion

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages

    India has a history of being a fractured nation, at times this disunity was even able to save them from being taken over by conquerors like Alexander the Great. However, their luck was doomed to run out. India has always been a country rich in resources, making it natural prey to the British imperialists who not only wished to exploit these resources but the people of India as well. With a viewpoint such as this, it’s simple to see why Indian's view of British Imperialists evolved into yet another divided nation, with some coming to accept and see the benefits of Britain's political control, while others couldn’t come to terms with how easily the British system disregarded them and how altered it was from the once great Mughal Empire. Despite…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Initially the Indian people accepted the British rule because of the benefits. The British had the…

    • 1337 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    S C Bose

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Clement Attlee, the British Prime Minister during whose rule India became independent, mentioned that INA activities of Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose (which weakened the Indian Army – the very foundation of the British Empire in India) and the Royal Indian Navy mutiny in 1946[9][10][11][12] were major reasons…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays