Preview

Violence in the Senate-1856.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
386 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Violence in the Senate-1856.
Violence in Kansas spilled over into the Congress itself. On May 22 1856, the day after the sack of Lawrence and two days before Brown's Pottawatomie Massacre, a sudden flash of savagery on the Senate floor electrified the whole country. Just two days earlier Senator Charles Sumner of Massachusetts had finished an inflammatory speech in which he described the treatment of Kansas as 'the rape of a virgin territory,' and blamed it on the South's 'depraved longing for a new slave State.' Sumner made Senator Andrew P. Butler of South Carolina a special target of his censure. He charged that Butler was a liar and implied that he kept a slave mistress. Sumner also teased him about a speech impediment caused by a stroke.

Sumner's rudeness caused outrage amongst many, most notably Butler's nephew, Preston S. Brooks, a fiery South Carolina Congressman. Knowing that Sumner would refuse a challenge to a duel, he finally confronted Sumner at his Senate desk on May 22, accused him of libel against South Carolina and Butler, and began beating him about the head with a cane while stunned senators looked on. Sumner, struggled to rise, wrenched the desk from the floor and collapsed. A gloating Brooks reported: 'Towards the last he bellowed like a calf', and 'I wore my cane out completely but saved the head which is gold.'

For two and a half years Sumner's empty seat was a solemn reminder of the violence done to him. Some thought the senator was feigning injury, others that he really was physically disabled. In fact, although his injuries were bad enough, including two gashes to the skull, he seems to have suffered psychosomatic shock which left him incapable of functioning adequately.

Sumner was to become a Northern anti-slavery martyr. According to Gienapp 'bleeding Sumner' outrage Northerners more than 'bleeding Kansas'. Gienapp also claims the anger in the North was so great that 'Almost overnight the entire complexion of the Presidential campaign was transformed'. Here was

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    o “The Senate was regarded as the central institution of the Roman state” (Beard and Crawford).…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1856 a law was passed that Kansas and Nebraska were able to vote on whether or not or not to be a slave state. Kansas was the first to get all their votes in and it ultimately ended up being a slave state. John Brown and the anti-slavery advocates did not like the results of Kansas now being a slave state. In response to Kansas being a slave state they made a “Lawrence Kansas” which is ultimately a free-settlement in the territory of Kansas. Pro-slavery advocates did not like that they did this so they went to Lawrence Kansas and burnt the town to the ground. John Brown and his anti-slavery advocates despised that they did this to innocent people. So, he got revenge for the burning of the city by killing five pro-slavery supporters next…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapter 12 Outline

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. Why was the United States Navy able to have success in the fight for Canada?…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ap Us History Chapter 21

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. Those who favored overseas expansion by the United States in the late nineteenth century argued that…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    he Bleeding Kansas (1861) was a conflict between anti-slavery forces in the North and pro-slavery forces from the South, and its violence indicates that compromise unlikely. here were 5,000 pro-slavery men invaded Kansas, and 200 men died and the killing spree took place for ten years in a row. The question of the conflict is whether Kansas would allow or decline slavery, and if Kansas would become a slave or free state. After the Bleeding Kansas, Preston Brooks attacked Charles Sumner after he gave a speech attacking the forces for Kansas. Lincoln's election, who was a Republican, supported the banning of slavery in the United States. In 1852, the book Uncle Tom's Cabin was written before the Civil War took action but it relates to the Civil…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brooks was born in South Carolina in 1819 and went to the South Carolina College in 1839, which is known as the University of South Carolina today. Despite his excellent grades, he faced many difficulties at school, from terrible attendance to his infamous duels. Eventually, he was expelled and never graduated from college (Puleo). He had attended law school and became involved with the Mexican War. In fact, he served as a captain in the Palmetto Regiment, establishing his role within United States history briefly (Gienapp). In 1853, he was elected as a representative in the House of Representatives. Less known was his brother, John Hampden Brooks, who entirely supported Preston Brooks’s decision in beating Charles Sumner. Later, through letters, John expressed his glee and his wholehearted support for his brother. Yet, in reality, the incident faced much more controversy nationwide. On May 22, 1856, Brooks briskly strode into the Senate chamber and began to beat Senator Charles Sumner violently with his cane (“Commentary on 1856”). As a Democrat, his views were mainly for slavery, typical of the time. To his credit, Brooks was known as a very moderate Democrat, one willing to compromise often with the other side and stressed the need for cooperation. Newspapers had attributed characteristics like being “considerate and kind” to Brooks’s character (Puleo). But…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Killing Lincoln” is a historical thriller written by Bill O’Reilly that explains the events prior to, and after the death, of our beloved 16th President, Abraham Lincoln. Bill O’Reilly first sets the stage in the last days of our great Civil War, which takes place in the beginning of April, 1865. Mr. O’Reilly takes the readers from the civil war, to the killing of Lincoln, to the pursuit of the assassins, to the final hour of John Wilkes Booth’s life. Knowing that there are many Civil War battles and that the assassins of Lincoln fled to many different places, the setting of “Killing Lincoln” varies greatly, ranging from the battle of St. Petersburg, to an old barn shed in the Maryland countryside where John Wilkes Booth and David Harold are sleeping. Ultimately, the book that Bill O’Reilly provides for his readers is about Abraham Lincoln’s death and how it impacted the world. Abraham Lincoln and his death were significant to American history because he abolished slavery, ended the Civil War, and was a godly leader among men.…

    • 901 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By this time, so many more Northerners had become opposed, morally, to slavery and had spoken out against. Many people were opposed to slavery because the white families had a very hard time competing against the inexpensive labor of the slaves and could not rise above to grasp what everyone wanted, the American dream. When the Kansas-Nebraska Act was put into place in the hopes that popular choice would make Kansas a slave state and Nebraska a free state which would maintain balance and would also organize even more territory coming in from the Louisiana Purchase in order to further the railroad construction. This conflict instigated dramatic change in addition to the change created by negating the Missouri Compromise Line. Because it repealed the Missouri Compromise in which slavery was not to expand north of the 36’30 line and also because many in Kansas were thoroughly against slavery, both morally, and for their financial well-being which led to the event known as Bleeding Kansas where bloodshed had become evident over the dispute, this change also involved the end of peaceful compromise. Those opposed to the spread of slavery like John Brown went to Kansas and killed pro-slavery Southerners. Those who thought the political strategy of popular sovereignty would maintain balance were proved wrong when the territory became chaotic.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charles Sumner was born in January 6th, 1811 and died on March 11th, 1874. He was a United States senator from Massachusetts in 1851 to 1874. Sumner played a prominent role in the United States Civil War era. He was a keen abolitionist who refused compromise on the issue of equal rights for blacks. In 1855, Sumner expressed his feelings in his speech, "The Crime Against Kansas." In this speech, he denounced his opponents, including South Carolina's Senator Andrew P. Butler. Two days later Preston Brooks, Butler's nephew and a congressman from South Carolina, went into the senate chamber and beat Sumner unconscious with a cane. Brooks was a hero to his voters and was re-elected; Sumner, who took three years to recover from the beating, was a martyr to his voters and was…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He negotiated the Act that opened Kansas and Nebraska territories for settlement. It also advocated for territorial legislatures to have the power to decide on all slavery issues (Carnes & Garraty, 2012, p.354). The Act repealed the Missouri Compromise. Northern states vehemently opposed the Act as it led to an increase in the locality of slavery. In passing the law, the nation took the greatest single step in its march towards the abyss of civil war.…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In May 1856, a pro-slavery mob attacked a free soil stronghold in Lawrence. They burned down public buildings and homes. There was also the Pottawatomie Creek Massacre, where abolitionist forces attacked a small pro-slavery settlement in Pott. Creek. 5 men were executed. After this, the war lasted another 4 months. The new governor, John Geary, managed to send Missourians home in 1856. Frail tranquility followed, but violent attacks continued for several more years.…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act set the stage for what began “Bleeding Kansas” and ultimately the Civil War. As settlers began moving west of the Mississippi River, they moved into the area which is present-day Nebraska. Since the area was not yet a structured state, the people could not live there. The area that was wanted was located in a part of the United States that had outlawed slavery due to the Missouri Compromise of 1820. This, in turn, caused representatives in Congress to have no interest in creating a Nebraska territory. Senator Stephen A. Douglas was the driving factor behind the Kansas-Nebraska Act. With the goal in mind that Nebraska would become a territory, the Kansas- Nebraska Act would allow each territory the ability to choose whether or not they supported slavery. With this being enacted, it was a direct violation of the Missouri Compromise. The bill that allowed territories to decide for or against slavery, also known as popular sovereignty, split the Whig party into two different groups; the northern Whigs and the southern Whigs with the northerners organizing the Republican Party.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This bill (known as popular sovereignty) would allow the people of Kansas and Nebraska to decide whether they want to allow slavery in these areas. This bill won sectional votes and therefore, became a law in Kansas and Nebraska. This bill of popular sovereignty, cancelled the 1820 Missouri Compromise which had banned the expansion of slavery. This made the Northern States angry because they wanted to end slavery, however now, they feared that slavery would spread in the West. Furthermore, the confrontation from the North made the South slavery supporters angry because they believed that the Kansas Nebraska bill had been approved. The bill also created conflict between the citizens of Nebraska and Kansas. All the conflicting cities and states led to riots (Bleeding of Kansas). This unrest kept on raising between Kansas, Nebraska and North and…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Legislative History Paper

    • 1950 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Interpreting statutes is never simple and sometimes even problematic; there are several reasons for this. First is because the United States does not have a generally accepted and consistent applied theory for interpreting statues[1]. Second, statutes are written and the texts used to write the statutes are sometimes vague, or the text might be outdated and have a new meaning. Finally, interpreting statutes are sometimes problematic because the entire statute might have been constructed vaguely and left open to interpretation. The problems with statutory interpretations caused many legal scholars to debate on what method is best suited for interpreting statues. Two prestigious Supreme Court Justices provided their opinion on what method is best suited for interpreting statues as well. Justice Scalia praises textualism, in which “one need not be too dull to perceive the border social purposes that a statute is designed, or could be designed, to serve; or too hidebound to realize that new times require new laws. One need only hold the belief that judges have no authority to pursue those broader purposes or write those new laws”[2] Justice Breyer praises legislative history, in which one reviews and analyzes “the statements made in the floor debates, committees reports, and even committee testimony, leading up to the enactment of the legislation.”[3] Given the fact that statutes are sometimes ambiguous, the use of legislative history is occasionally needed in order to resolve statutory conflicts, and this is why the use of legislative history should never be completely abandoned.…

    • 1950 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charles Sumner the senator of Massachussetts in 1856 gave a speech on May 20th titled, “ The Crime Against Kansas.” This speech “attacked Southerners for forcing slavery on the territory.” Sumner coming from the anti-slavery state of Massachussetts believed that slavery was wrong and that the south should get rid of it. While trying to make his point Charles Sumner called out the Senator of South Carolina, Andrew Butler and made bold insults directed towards him. Two days after Charles Sumner’s speech Andrew Butler’s nephew Preston Brooks “approached Sumner at his senate desk and beat him with his cane.” After the attack Sumner was badly injured and wasn’t able to return to his full health. People in the south were supportive of Brooks’ actions.…

    • 163 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays