is general consensus that the entire book of Matthew was written by the same person. Therefore, the parable of forgiveness would have been written by the author of the book of Matthew. There are no hints revealed in the passage as to who the author may have been. There is only a single reference to Peter and Jesus. Although the writer is not known, the authorship of the passage does not in any way affect its meaning.
Date and Provenance
With no absolute author to link the book of Matthew to, the date and origin of the book are hard to determine. Daniel Harrington presents Syria and Palestine as various locations at which the book could have been written. William Barclay mirrors these two locations, but also adds Alexandria, Egypt as a possible place of origin. However, general belief is that the book of Matthew was written somewhere in Palestine. The date of Matthew is a little more concrete because of the references throughout the book to the intact Temple in Jerusalem. Alex Varughese states that since the Temple was destroyed in 70 A.D., the generally accepted date of the book of Matthew is somewhere just prior to the Temple's destruction. The most difficult aspect of the passage for the modern reader to understand is the societal cast system used in the parable. In today's world, we do not encounter slavery as it persisted back when Matthew was written. Moreover, we cannot fathom having ourselves, as well as our families, sold to repay a debt. There are, however, slight similarities found in the passage that can be related to the world today, the most prominent being the similarity of debt. Currently, there are many people in the world that have debt, and we all know the burden that it can put on our lives. In this way, we can sympathize with the servant that owed the king money.
Occasion and Purpose The parable of forgiveness is a discourse in which Jesus uses a story to teach about heavenly mercy. This genre is quite useful as a way of making abstract ideas easily understandable. The author uses a subject matter familiar to his audience in an attempt to make the act of forgiveness more applicable to their lives. At this point in history, the people were still living according to the Old Covenant. The laws of this covenant required sacrifices for sins. Moreover, one had to seek forgiveness from God through a priest. According to Manlio Simonetti, the author of this passage wished to show the people of the day that God's New Covenant would be one in which forgiveness could be directly received from Him, instead of a priest. The book of Matthew as a whole was believed to have been written for a number of reasons. Myron Augsburger believes, as do many others, that Matthew was written to highlight the teachings and words of Christ. Albert Barnett also considers the book of Matthew to have been written in an attempt to show the people that Jesus was the fulfillment of the Old Testament prophecies. Lastly, Douglas Hare assumes that the author of the book of Matthew was making an effort to give a better account of the genealogy and life of Christ.
Literary Context The parable of forgiveness is just one of the many stories in the book of Matthew used by Jesus to teach the people of his Father's ways.
The passage is located in the eighteenth chapter of Matthew (Matthew has twenty-eight chapters). The passage before the parable of forgiveness is entitled "A Brother Who Sins Against You" (Matthew 18:15-20). The lesson following the forgiveness parable is one that deals with divorce in marriage. Although the teaching about divorce is not related to my passage, the six verses (15-20) preceding it are of great importance. These verses give guidance as to how to approach someone that has sinned against you. Verse 15 begins with the words, "If your brother sins against you " (NIV). They deal with the responsibility and accountability of the sinner. The forgiveness parable follows in a practical sequence of events because it addresses how one should handle a person that has sinned against him or her. Verse 21 begins by saying, "The Peter came to Jesus and asked, Lord, how many times shall I forgive a brother when he sins against me?'" In this way, the verses preceding the parable of forgiveness set up a situation in which forgiveness is present. The overall meaning of the book would not be affected if my passage was omitted. However, the parable of forgiveness demonstrates how forgiveness works in the New
Covenant.
Morris, Leon. "The Gospel According to Matthew." The Pillar New Testament Commentary. 1992.
Hendriksen, William. "Matthew." New Testament Commentary. 1973.
Simonetti, Manlio. "New Testament 1b: Matthew 14-28." Ancient Christian Commentary on Scripture. 2002.
Barclay, William. "The Gospel of Matthew: Volume 2." The Daily Study Bible Series. Revised ed. 1975.
Harrington, Daniel J. "The Gospel of Matthew." Sacra Pagina Series: Volume 1. 1991.
Augsburger, Myron S. "Matthew." The Communicator's Commentary. 1982.
Argyle, A. W. "The Gospel According to Matthew." The Cambridge Bible Commentary on the New English Bible. 1963.
Hare, Douglas R. "Matthew." Interpretation: A Bible Commentary of Teaching and Preaching. 1993.
Barnett, Albert E. The New Testament: Its Making and Meaning. New York: Pantheon, 1946.
Varughese, Alex. Discovering the Bible: Story and Faith of the Biblical Communities. Kansas City: Beacon Hill Press, 2006.
The Holy Bible: New International Version. International Bible Society, 1984.