Preview

Was Flowers For Algernon Ethical

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1157 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Was Flowers For Algernon Ethical
Dupuy Kenzie Chang English Period 2
OPTION 2 WRITING ASSIGNMENT

Animal and human testing is a widely known experiment used in life. People either despise it or think it’s necessary and useful. The story Flowers for Algernon by Daniel Keyes is about a man named Charlie Gordon who gets a surgery and ends up becoming temporarily smart. Was performing an experiment on Charlie Gordon ethical? Some might say that it wasn’t ethical. Charlie didn’t even know what he was getting himself into. Others will say that it was ethical. I believe that it was ethical to perform an experiment on him. My reasons for why performing surgery on Charlie was ethical because first of all Charlie volunteered, next, it was for a good cause, and lastly,
…show more content…
After all, the main point of the surgery was to help the mentally disabled people such as Charlie. My first piece of evidence is that it could be used to make people smarter for a good cause. In the progress report Charlie says the Dr. Nemur, one of his doctors said, “remember he will be the first human beeng ever to have his intelijence tripled by surgicle meens.” (pg3). This is one example of how this can be useful, it will significantly boost the intelligence of someone. This is something that has so many good uses and more importantly can help people who are mentally disabled. Furthermore, it has the potential to impact the lives of many of the mentally disabled people. My second piece of evidence is that the data of his results can be used in the future to prevent deaths from the surgery. In the progress report, Charlie says, “If I could be made into a genius, what about thousand of others like myself? What fantastic levels might be achieved by using this technique on normal people? Or geniuses?(pg14). This means that there are many possible ways that the surgery could be used. The surgery as mentioned in the quote could be used for more than just helping disabled people, but also to improve the intelligence of others who don’t necessarily need the surgery. Based on how smart Charlie became, the assistance of the surgery could easily make normal people have an immense impact on the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The surgery showed the doctors that the surgery can be used on humans, but it has never been done before on humans. There were some side effects to Charlie's surgery. Therefore Charlie's doctors had to act ethically. The side effects were that Charlie would be smart for a little while, and act like a normal human being, but later in life Charlie would go back to being himself again. As…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The first reason why I believe That charlie should have had the operation is that while he was a genius he discovered thing about what was happening to him and he called it the “Algernon-Gordon Effect” (keyes, 80). He also found out how the artificial intelligence works and how it wears off…

    • 96 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the operation, Charlie began to go through a regression. Before the operation he was smarter than he is now that he regrets. “I did a dumb thing today I for got I wasnt in Miss Kinnians class at the adult centen any more like I use to be”(Keyes 243). His regression was so awful that his I.Q decrees to 68. So it was an awful idea…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What if there was an operation to make people with a low IQ smarter? In the story,” Flowers for Algernon”, one of the most asked questions is, should Charlie have had the operation? No, I do not think that Charlie should have had the operation and these are reasons why.…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charlie Gordon Argument

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Charlie Gordon was a determined man. He wanted to learn as much as he could but he was unable to because he was mentally retarded. Meanwhile, his doctors were testing an operation which they wanted to perform on Charlie to make him more intelligent however, he would eventually lose his intelligence and knowledge leading to his death. He would be unable to connect with other people because he would be too smart. Despite these affects, people still believe that the operation preformed on Charlie was ethical. Charlie Gordon's doctors didn't act ethically when they preformed the surgery on Charlie Gordon to make him smarter.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Strauss and Dr. Nemur played an extremely large part in the tragedy. They used Charlie as an experiment; they did not truly care about his health! They had used him to the largest advantage- that much that could have cost him his life. The surgery had not worked on most of the lab mice that the doctors had worked on; Charlie was the first human to ever receive the surgery. If it did not work with mice, why would it possibly work on a human? The doctors knew that the surgery would more than likely not succeed, as well. They, along with Miss Kinnian (who, in addition, happened to know the same), did not inform Charlie on the possible failure included in the surgery. Their pretentious auras caused them to become ignorant and selfish. Charlie, as a mastermind, came to realize about the surgery; how it would be a…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the scientific short story “Flowers for Algernon”, by Daniel Keyes, Charlie Gordon should not have had the operation to make him intelligent. Charlie was better before the operation. For…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    about whether or not you believe Charlie should have had the operation and then you must persuade your reader to agree…

    • 1800 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    time to get to know and understand him they would have seen that he had a good heart…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Charlie was all in for the surgery no matter what because all he wanted was to be smarter than he was. Although all he got was to experience about a few weeks of being smart. It made him want to work harder and make himself smart again after the intelligence wore off. He could have lived his life if he didn't have the surgery, but now there is that possibility that he will pass before he was able to do the things he was wanting to do. Therefore the surgery was unnecessary and Charlie shouldn't of had to go through that…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The subject of animal testing for medical research has been a topic of argument for decades now. With valid points for either side of the argument, it is certainly understandable as to why this has yet to be settled. Some questions everyone is still faced with today are, is animal testing for medical purposes right and ethical? Which types of testing are ethical? What would modern medicine be like today if we had not used animals for medical testing in the first place? All of these questions present strong arguments when answered, and will be addressed throughout this paper. With modern medicine as advanced as it is today, many argue that medical testing on animals should be conducted to make medical advances, while others argue it should not be done; This paper will address and evaluate all of the pros and cons of each side of the argument from a Utilitarian and Kantian viewpoint, proving in the end that animal testing was and still is very necessary for medical purposes.…

    • 2751 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    All of my life I have had a tremendous amount of passion for all animals, and in most instances I've found that I have felt more comfortable around them than I do people, finding myself drawn to their many personable qualities, such as innocence, loyalty, lack of judgment, and overall cheerful disposition. As I have grown, my care for animals and their well being has as well, and my eyes have been opened to the horrors taking place all throughout the globe involving poor, innocent animals, who are unable to defend themselves, against the very people they are meant to find companionship with. The controversy over the practice of utilizing animals for the purposes of testing has been an issue for the past 30-40 years, and with it, comes the moral debate. However, the topic of ongoing question, whether animal testing is right or wrong, lies within your own personal morals.…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay About Animal Testing

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Animal testing is a touchy subject to many people. The idea of using animals for the gain of the human race is seen as immoral by some people, while on the other hand, some people see animal experimentation as an impactful part of the scientific field. Through animal testing there has been many discoveries that have highly influenced the medical field. In regards to animal testing, is it beneficial or is it an unnecessary act of cruelty?…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Animal Testing

    • 1592 Words
    • 7 Pages

    “Examples of medications that have been the result of animal testing are Penicillin, several asthma treatments, cancer and HIV drugs, vaccines, antibiotics, and insulin (Occupy Theory, 1).” Since there can be new medications found from utilising this form of testing, many people see it as beneficial to the human population. Since it’s more beneficial to humans than it is a bigger hurt to the animal species, most people believe that animal testing is okay. But, according to William H. Farland and Vicki Vaughn-Dellarco, “Abelson comments that laboratory studies of chemicals and their use in risk assessment have not been shown to have substantially benefited human health (1908).” I had interviewed my AP Biology teacher Mr. Nolan Flores. He teaches regents biology, AP biology, and astronomy. Mr. Flores even teaches animal behaviors in biology so he has a basic knowledge of animals. When I had interviewed Mr. Flores he had talked about his personal view on animal testing. He concurred with the prior statement that if it is more beneficial to test on an animal because it could save someone's life, then he is for animal testing. For him, he also stated that it depends on the situation and if the testing is ethical or not. If it involves cruel or unusual punishment to the animal, then he is against…

    • 1592 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Satire On Animal Testing

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Animals do not have a say once they are taken away from their current living space, and then killed or have to suffer through what the researchers put them through. These innocents now are being punished, abused, and now have more risks and a shortened life span. Realistically, in my opinion, in order to experiment on animals you really don’t have a heart. People who love animals, could never and would never experiment on them because the things that people do to them we really don’t deserve the satisfaction of animals. “Animals used in experiments are commonly subjected to force feeding, forced inhalation, food and water deprivation, prolonged periods of physical restraint, the infliction of burns and other wounds to study the healing process, the infliction of pain to study its effects and remedies, and "killing by carbon dioxide asphyxiation, neck-breaking, decapitation, or other means." This piece of textual evidence is explaining how animals are not treated properly while being used in experimentation. Animals are forced to do things unwanted to, and also are deprived of certain things. Consider the people who have to do this for a living- they are finding cures for us humans, and also testing products such as cosmetics and shampoos and making sure that we can use them. You may think that animal testing is beneficial, but it's not, it's putting animals life in danger. Rabbits are used to test cosmetics and shampoos, during this process rabbits are powerless and have their eyelids opened by clips this can occur for days. Moving forward, as you can see many animals are harmed during the process and it is very heartbreaking to hear about the many animals that are hurt or killed to find cures for us. If you anyone who loves animals, if animal experimentation is okay, they would say it was abusive, because you taking the life of an innocent animal and putting it in…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays