Was The Atomic Bomb Justified
America was justified in its decision to drop Atomic weapons on Japan during World War Two’ Discuss.
Towards the end of World War II, Japan had already been weakened by the battle of coral sea, but on August 6, 1945 an American B-29 bomber dropped a first hand developed atomic bomb on the civilian and military inhabited city of Hiroshima. 70,000 people were killed instantly. Thousands were left heavily injured and sick. The United States had many different reasons to be justified to have dropped the bomb. Nevertheless, the bomb was ‘a weapon of mass description, a weapon of terror’.
The United States explain that the bombing was justified as the Japanese technically started the feud, as the United States wasn't part of the war when the Japanese …show more content…
Many farming estates had been heavily damaged. Thus, leading to poor trade and disease. Radioactivity was transferred from the crops to the significant amount of people still alive. Pushing the ‘people who were not injured in the bombing, … [to] dying mysteriously and horribly from an unknown something which can only [be described] as the atomic plague.’ A British journalist wrote describing concern 30 days after the bombing. Up to 70,000 people were killed and another 70,000 were left injured. The few people that were still alive were forever traumatised.‘The skin was burned off some of them [the people] and was hanging from their hands and from their chin’ A young girl aged five at the time had witnessed. For many families, the moment someone had walked out the door, was the last time that they would ever see each other again. In comparison, the Pearl Harbour bombing did not affect as many people in which the way of the Hiroshima bombing did. An entire city was affected and damaged for years after the bombing, whereas, the pearl harbour bombing
Towards the end of World War II, Japan had already been weakened by the battle of coral sea, but on August 6, 1945 an American B-29 bomber dropped a first hand developed atomic bomb on the civilian and military inhabited city of Hiroshima. 70,000 people were killed instantly. Thousands were left heavily injured and sick. The United States had many different reasons to be justified to have dropped the bomb. Nevertheless, the bomb was ‘a weapon of mass description, a weapon of terror’.
The United States explain that the bombing was justified as the Japanese technically started the feud, as the United States wasn't part of the war when the Japanese …show more content…
Many farming estates had been heavily damaged. Thus, leading to poor trade and disease. Radioactivity was transferred from the crops to the significant amount of people still alive. Pushing the ‘people who were not injured in the bombing, … [to] dying mysteriously and horribly from an unknown something which can only [be described] as the atomic plague.’ A British journalist wrote describing concern 30 days after the bombing. Up to 70,000 people were killed and another 70,000 were left injured. The few people that were still alive were forever traumatised.‘The skin was burned off some of them [the people] and was hanging from their hands and from their chin’ A young girl aged five at the time had witnessed. For many families, the moment someone had walked out the door, was the last time that they would ever see each other again. In comparison, the Pearl Harbour bombing did not affect as many people in which the way of the Hiroshima bombing did. An entire city was affected and damaged for years after the bombing, whereas, the pearl harbour bombing