2011211066
영어영문학과
송세미
Thinking Critically about ” Welcome to Sellafield” (Stan Eales)
” Welcome to Sellafield” 이라는 cartoon을 이해하기 위해서 Stan Eales 작가에 대한 이해가 선행 되어야 할 것이다.
1) Translate Eales’s carton into a verbal argument by finishing this sentence:
“Nuclear energy is bad because (“ Sellafield’s historical evidence prove that ” )
2) Cartoons get their power from their ability to encapsulate a complex argument in a striking visual image.
In your own words, explain how this cartoon uses logos, pathos, and ethos to create its persuasive effect.
3) How would William Sweet (previous reading) respond to this cartoon?
Thinking Critically …show more content…
What contemporary research is prompting Pitts’s column?
2) Pitts’s argument takes a stand on the issue question, “ Is spanking a good childrearing practice?” What claim does he makes in this argument? What reasons and evidence does he offer to support this claim?
3) Where does Pitts acknowledge and respond to opposing view?
4) To understand the intensity of the social controversy on this issue, we suggest that you search the keywords “ spanking” and “corporal punishment” using an online database and the Web. What different positions do you find represented on articles and by advocacy Web sites such as the site for the Center for Effective Discipline? How would these sources challenge Pitts’s position and