Nancy G. Isenberg is an American historian, and the T. Harry Williams Professor of history at Louisiana State University. She graduated from Rutgers University, and University of Wisconsin. One of her other most famous works is Fallen Founder: The Life of Aron Burr which won the Oklahoma Book Award for best book in nonfiction. White Trash: The 400 Year Untold History of Class in America…
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness”, with these two lines within the Declaration of Independence, America was born as a country of equality for all. However, America today, is a country ridden with disparity and inequality, resulting in glaring divisions amongst the American people. Today, the top 1% owns nearly half of America’s wealth, leaving the remaining 99% with only 50% of America’s wealth. Furthermore, according to the U.S Census, 27% of Black or African American households are living below poverty, while only 10% of White households are living below poverty today.…
There is still debate on whether or not welfare recipients should be drug tested if positive is not receive aid from the government. Before our tax payers/ society opinions can be affected, they must be presented background information on the issue and a composing of a few different arguments. One view is that by the recipients knowing they will be drug tested may prevent them from using drugs for the sake of their family. Another view is with testing positive may help that individual seek guidance in bettering their life style. A third view is the lost in money by implementing thousands of recipients to unconstitutionally preform a drug screening, also with the possibility is losing aid for their family.…
Federally funded and governed us welfare began in the 1930s. Welfare isn’t bad to get. Some people get welfare and some don’t. Some people get them because they be broke and being on welfare. The use welfare stayed in the hands of federally government and the the type and amount of aid available to individual and dependent children varies from state to state. Once an appointment is completed a case worker will review all required documents, applications and information provided at the meeting and apply for welfare program one must contact the local human service department located in the phone book. Common documents asked for are proof of income, ID, and utility bills or other proof of residency. Once and appointment is completed a case worker will review all required documents application and…
Welfare was created in 1935 to provide for the families in need of food, clothing, and shelter, but today it has become a large, controversial topic. Some people argue that it is ridiculous that some people can’t take care of themselves and must rely on everyone else’s money to support them. Those people cause those on welfare to become ashamed of themselves. I believe people on welfare should not feel ashamed because some do hold a job if not multiple, but still cannot provide for themselves and others have certain disabilities that restrict them from getting a job and supporting themselves.…
Many people believe our welfare system is poor, unregulated, and unstable. Most individuals who are on welfare abuse the privileges they receive; moreover, a vast amount of the individuals do not even need the financial support. Our welfare system should be changed in order to support those who really need aid. It is terrible to see individuals who truly need help not be able to receive it because of other people who take advantage of something they do not need.…
The much-discussed crisis of the welfare state is now two decades old. The tremendous twentieth-century expansion of social programs has been a remarkable feature of advanced industrial societies. In all these countries the welfare state is a core institution, accounting for between one-fifth and one-third of GNP. Ever since the postwar economic boom ended in the early 1970s, however, social programs have faced mounting political challenges. Questions of expansion have long since given way to an acknowledgment of the limits to welfare state growth and the prospect for extended austerity. Despite this fundamental change, however, we still know stunningly little about the politics of social policy retrenchment. In contrast to our vast knowledge of the dynamics of welfare state expansion--arguably the most well-tilled subfield of comparative public policy--welfare state retrenchment remains largely uncharted terrain. 1 Theoretically informed discussion has been limited to very abstract commentaries or the rather reflexive, often implicit application of propositions derived from the study of social policy expansion.…
Benefits that were in placed to help African Americans were no longer there or they were hard to get. There were a certain amount of benefits in the African American communities that were limited to certain amount of people due to the restrictions the benefits had. Welfare was replaced with AFDC, which came with TANF, and TANF limits the amount of time you can use the benefits and restricted convicted felons with drug offenses from getting it (Alexander). This clearly is going to affect the Black communities, because if they can not get these benefits then they are going to go back on the streets to sell drugs, which is going to lead to jail. If the system wants to help people, then why put restrictions on the things they need. It seems as…
The government should abolish welfare because people that work get money taken from them, people that do not have a job receive food stamps, and the people that are unemployed or don't want a job still get free money. Our country is going to fall apart if we don't put a stop to welfare checks.…
Welfare in America is one of the top issues that America faces today. Americans face a problem because instead of giving welfare benefits to people who truly need it, the government is just handing out money to anyone who ask for it. And in return it does not help the other problem America faces which is poverty. Federal funding welfare began during the the Great Depression in the 1930’s. The government created the system to help out families and individuals who have little income and who needed help. The benefits were known as forms of healthcare and food stamps. Welfare is a great program that assists many people. Although the systems motivates people to not nor even search for a job. Once people get dependent on welfare they now depend on…
America the promised land, America with 37 million poor citizens living under welfare recipients! But, are all these people really poor? Are all these people in real need to live in the shoulders of American taxpayer, or are they “spineless creatures” who abuse state benefits? These questions deserve to be answers for all taxpayers who not only sweat by working, but they must also pay for all those that are nothing more than parasites. Our government is all about training these people to live in poverty and in return they have children who grow up to believe that the government should pay their way.…
Do not sit here and tell me that White Americans get more advantage because we have more money! Take a look at EBT/government funding. How many Black, Whites, and Hispanics are receiving those funds? (I would not know because like I said, “I can’t research this topic.”) It isn’t like a black male gets arrested and does not get put out on bond because everyone has that right. It’s just whether you can pay that bond or how bad the crime was that you committed is. All races of people live in poverty, live in public housing, and all have uneducated people who live off others. The color of a person’s skin does not dictate how they will live, what crimes they commit or what punishment they will have. Some people (regardless of skin color) will never want to rise above the level to complete their worth. Ever heard “If you hang around trash, you start smelling like it?” People of every skin color and background have to rise above at some point. Unless they were born into royalty. Like that story, 1 Father and 2 Sons. The Father is an alcoholic, has no job, no education, and is living off of government funds. One son goes to colleges, gets married, has a job and has never touched alcohol. While the other son turned out just like the father. It’s the way you look at life. It is the way you perceive it. Rise above what you were raised in and don’t make things about race. Rise above the stereotype and start making new ones.…
“The average black household income in 1955 was $2,890 just 55% of that a white household $5,228” (Fuller). It was not only income that was lower for blacks, they had a higher illiteracy rate, and well they had to deal with segregation. This shows that blacks did not have it easy at all. “The median household income for black families in 2001 was $33,600, while it was $54,000 for whites” (Fuller). It has been 50 years and whites still make far more than blacks. If we keep going at this rate it will take hundreds of years until blacks and whites are truly equal. All in all a lot has changed to make blacks/whites equal, but there is still room for change.…
Racial discrimination is the main and ongoing problem in the social life of Americans. When we look at the gap of incomes between White and African Americans, we can see the inequality between these two groups. In general, whites have more annual earnings than their black counterparts in America. Lori Ann Campbell and Robert L. Kaufman emphasized that the wealth determinants, which are the indicators of socio-economic status, have effected more on Whites than Blacks. And even when society is organized, there is still some disparities on account of race and ethnicity. (Campbell and Kaufman, 2006). And income disparities between African and White Americans have definitely effected the peace of the social life. According to Campell and Kaufman to understand the inequality of wealth between African Americans and other citizens, we need to consider first how that income comes from, how it is accumulated and sended out through society. (Campbell and Kaufman, 2006).…
The representations of the poor and poverty shape access to the already limited spending on public services and policies that have intensified the dynamics of inequality (Bond 420). The misrepresentation of poverty in certain communities, takes away focus from the fact of decrease in spending in social programs and the ongoing growth of investment in incarceration. The unsympathetic treatment of the poor and the neoliberal indication that poor people are lazy, and if they worked harder they would be able to do well for themselves are attempts to justify the decrease in social services and increase funding to correctional facilities (Bond 420). As for the justification of the addition correctional facilities, that was much easier, governments…