What Are The Reasons Why Women Should Be Allowed In Combat

Women should be in combat. In 1994 The Department of Defense made a rule that prohibited women to be in combat. Before women were allowed in combat, many served with male units and in female engagement teams. Women were also found in the front lines whether they were officially designated combat troops or not, and they should be recognized for their service. ("Should Women Be Allowed to Fight in Combat?")
While there are cons to women being in combat, there are also many pros. Women can obtain some skills that men do not have. There is also always a chance that a woman is in better shape than a man. Participating includes more than strength, and sometimes, technical expertise and decision making skills can be more valuable on the battlefield.
She served at what would become the most dangerous bases in Afghanistan, Combat Outpost Keating. She also led a platoon of Military Police that contained thirty-six troops, including 6 other women. Fisher also had a mission in October 2006. She and her MPs had to team up with Able Troops Third Platoon. During this mission, they had to fight and push through a complex ambush. ("Women in Combat: One Soldier's Story – CNN Security Clearance - CNN.com Blogs")
Many people who want to join armed forces call the assessment they go through, “100 Hours of Hell.” Four women who went through this assessment were defeated until they read encouraging graffiti on a portable bathroom. The graffiti read, “The mind is its own place. And itself can make a hell of heaven and a heaven of hell. Don’t quit.” The United States Army Special Operations created the Cultural Support Teams in 2010 to help fight in Afghanistan. These teams contained men, who sometimes could not complete mission. The reasoning was that they could not get to the largest populations Afghan culture has, the women. ("'Ashley's War' Shares the Untold Stories of Women in Combat -
Females who cannot afford school, gain the necessary assets to be educated by joining the military. Women should not serve if their only reasoning is to get an education. Women who need an education and have a desire to serve, should benefit from being education by the military. ("9 Fundamental Pros and Cons of Women in Combat")
Excluding women from being in combat also contradicts “Land of the free and the home of the Brave.” Women prove to be just as brave as men and also just as free. It is also very foolish to turning someone who is willing and able to protect our country because they are female. When it comes down to it, women are fearless and courageous, no matter what. ("9 Fundamental Pros and Cons of Women in Combat") Angry women who are capable of being in combat are intimidating. Refusing women from combat will also cause an up rise of these women. In November 2012, four female soldiers gained the support of American Civil Liberties Union. These women announced that they were going to sue the Department of Defense because of the restrictions on women serving in frontline warfare. ("Women in Combat: US Military Officially Lifts Ban on Female Soldiers | US News | The