What Are The Similarities Between Israel And Malta

At the end of the Second World War, Belgium and Malta faced different economic and political realities. Belgium had been occupied for the majority of the war and its various industries put to work for Germany. During Belgium's occupation, a number of businessmen came together to form the Galopin Committee, headed by Alexandre Galopin. Under Galopin's leadership, the committee enacted a doctrine of economic production. The doctrine encouraged businesses to continue producing consumer goods, while refusing to produce war goods. This doctrine saved many factories and kept Belgian industrial expertise in Belgium. Germany recognized the importance of Antwerp, Belgium's primary and largest port, as did the Allies. As a result of this interest,
The surrender of its king to the Nazis had occurred without the consultation of the legislature or the military. As a result, many politicians called on the king to abdicate in favor of his heir. Within the government, questions arose about what was considered collaboration within the Belgian population. Both of these political questions created a divided nation and had to be dealt with swiftly. Malta was significantly different. Located in between Sicily and North Africa, Malta had been an important way station for Allied vessels and aircraft. Malta's location also made it a prime target and objective for the Axis. Throughout the war, Malta was under near air attacks by Italian and German aircraft. At the conclusion of the war, Malta was cratered and broken. The great harbor of Valetta, the primary point of trade for the island, had been damaged in the war and required extensive repairs. In terms of politics, Malta was approaching a transfer of power. Prior to the Second World War, Malta had been a Crown Colony. With the breakup of empires in the immediate aftermath of the war, Malta was approaching independence and would soon be required to recreate itself as a nation. Belgium and Malta both faced different problems at