Preview

What Caused Tsar Nicholas II Abdication?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
895 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Caused Tsar Nicholas II Abdication?
What Factors influenced Tsar Nicholas II Abdication?
On March 15th Tsar Nicholas Romanov II Abdicated from the throne for both himself and for his son Aleksey and his brother didn’t want the throne so he had to abdicate for all three of them, but why did he abdicate and what factors influenced abdication. The Romanovs had been ruling for over 300 years with every leader ruling a little bit differently, but Tsar Nicholas wasn’t the best leader and was weak at leading which led to revolutions as the people believed that they could make a difference. World War 1 was going on at the time as well as their being strikes and riots in Petrograd and the provisional government trying to take over Russia.
On the 1st August Germany declared war on Russia,
…show more content…
After the first Duma on the 8th July 1906 the Tsar thought it was too radical and was closed but on the 30th January the very next year the Tsar let them hold another, but the Tsar thought the Duma was still too radical and closed it down on the 3rd June 1907. The third Duma started on the 1st November 1907 and this time they stuck to the agenda and behaved themselves. Then when the war started and Germany declared war on Russia and with the Tsar gone to lead his troops into war the Duma was left alone to do what they wanted without the Tsar saying they are being too radical. The government was being led by the Tsarnia’s favourite father, Gregory Rasputin who wasn’t liked by very many people and by February 1917 a few months after Rasputins murder the government was in chaos. While the government was in chaos the army had left the Tsar, which meant that the riots weren't being controlled and the government lost control of the country and on the March 13th the Duma left the Tsar and asked him to abdicate which he later did. The Duma became the Provisional Government lead by Alexander

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Czar Nicholas was famous for his autocratic ideas, meaning that he theoretically had total power. His autocratic belief led to an ineffective rule. Nicholas II was the leader of the Russian Empire; however, he was not prepared for the tremendous obligations of administration. The Britannica article, “Nicholas II” claims, “Neither by upbringing nor by temperament was Nicholas fitted for the complex tasks that awaited him as autocratic ruler of a vast empire.” This suggests that Czar Nicholas’s rule was doomed from the start of his czarship. Nicholas’s inexperience explained his ineffectiveness as a ruler. In addition, Czar Nicholas’s absolutist beliefs blinded him from change. Nicholas II’s belief that he had absolute power and stubbornness clouded his view of change. According to Encyclopedia.com’s “Nicholas II,” “[Nicholas] was too stubborn and very slow to recognize the need for change. Nicholas found it…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The government was an autocracy which meant that all power resided in the hands of the Tsar. Nicholas II, however, had a weak and stubborn personality. He was not willing to share his authority with the Duma (parliament) and his government relied on oppression to remain in power. The army and Okhrana (secret police) were used to stamp out protests. A further key feature was that the government was dependent on a narrow social base of aristocratic supporters, which left it vulnerable to opposition from the vast majority of Russians. During the war years the growing scale of strikes and demonstrations was becoming too difficult for the government to handle.The war caused huge casualties (9 out of 15 million soldiers) for very little gain and a series of defeats in battle led to a collapse in morale. Consequently, the Tsar was blamed for failure because he had taken command of the army in 1915. As a result the Tsar was absent from the capital and he left his wife in charge. The Tsarina was distrusted because of her German origins and she was under the corrupt influence of Rasputin, who had the power to appoint and dismiss ministers at will. This led to a major loss of confidence in the government.…

    • 286 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nicholas II being the last tsar of the Romanov dynasty that lasted for over 300 years, is accountable for the fall of the Romanovs in 1917, however, there are various other reasons too that involved in the ultimate fall of tsarism in Russia in February 1917. While Nicholas’s indecisiveness played a major role in portraying his negligence, the other factors that involved the fall of tsarism were, the declining economic standards and the growth of political opposition along with Nicholas II’s penultimate absence when he was most needed in his country, due to the involvement in the first world war, which was another mistake made by the tsar.…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Undeniably, Nicholas II had an enormous role in bringing about the downfall of the Romanov Dynasty in March 1917. Whilst many historians argue the fall of the Tsarist regime to be the direct response and product of World War I, it is quite evident that it was Nicholas’ inefficient and fatal autocratic ruling which led to the March Revolution of 1917. The effects of Russia’s involvement in numerous wars only heightened and highlighted Nicholas’ unsuitability for the role of Tsar, and his absolute and stubborn belief in autocracy. Had Nicholas’ various choices throughout his reign differed, the Romanov Dynasty could in fact, have existed…

    • 1391 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Russia Timeline

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages

    14. 23-27 February 1917, February Revolution: After a series of strikes demanding the end of autocracy and the pulling out of WWI, soldiers join the protesters, Petrograd Soviet founded…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Strike at Petrograd

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On January 9th, 1917, 140,000 workers went on strike in Petrograd to commemorate Bloody Sunday. Bloody Sunday was on January 22nd, 1905, more than 3,000 unarmed, peaceful demonstrators, led by Father Gapon, were marching to present a petition to Czar Nicolas II. The Imperial Guard fired warning shots and then fired directly into the crowd, killing 96 and injuring 333. Later on February 14th, 1917, over 140,000 people went on strike in Petrograd because of food shortages, which were a very big problem at this time. Four days later on February 19th the government announces that bread will be rationed starting March 1st, this causes panic buying. On February 26th the number has grown to over 200,000, troops are ordered to fire into the crowd. They cause tens of causalities but later stop and go against the Czar’s orders. In March the Czar abdicated himself in order to help the war and peace.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Which of the previous Tsars were most to blame for the problems inherited by Nicholas II when he ascended to the throne in 1894?…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Tsarist Autocracy

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Tsarist autocracy has succeeded for more than three hundred years, but the Russian Revolution that occurred on November 1917 ended the long term autocracy. During this time period, Tsar Nicholas II was the leader of Russia and indeed the last one. He caused Russia’s downfall and made many Russians frustrated about the government. The Tsar did not acknowledge the nation's problems and failed to improve the lives of the citizens. As the Russians struggled with limited rights and lack of help from Nicholas II, they had to make a move. Although peasant unrest led to the Russians protesting and rebelling against the country, the Russian Revolution occurred because of Tsar Nicholas II’s weak leadership, in which he failed to accomplished the Russian’s goals, horribly managed the military, and thought that the system should not change.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    They didn't like the idea of one man running Russia and they wanted to get rid of him, they had done plenty of things to push him out of power but it just wasn't enough. When the people wanted a Duma the Tsar gave them one but they ended up killing one of his advisors so he tried to get rid of if again, he was unsuccessful. The Duma and the Tsar both have their points and they both want the same type of thing but they want to do it different ways, they both wanted the people to have food, water and warmth. The Duma had a bigger voice and the people liked the way they said they would do things if they were in power, well most of them, there were some people that were loyal to their Tsar and wanted him to stay in power, these people were the white Russians. The Duma was getting closer to the Tsar and more people were joining the Red Russians. That is why The Role of the Duma is one of my three reasons on why the Tsar fell from…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    unitisation of the left and right wing of the Duma and the apparent cooperation between the…

    • 896 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Revolution of 1905, Russians gained new political freedom. However, Russia was still plagued with problems. The famine from previous years still raged on. In 1914, Russia joined World War I. To pay for the war, Russia raised taxes, secured foreign loans, and printed more money. This combined with many other factors, left the people of Russia wanting change. They needed the government to change, the famine to end, and economic stability.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Alexander II became the Tsar, Russia was in total disarray. Her once widely respected and feared army was humiliated on the battlefields in the Crimean Peninsula, 80% of the people were in poverty and illiterate. Russia was still stuck in the middle ages while the rest of Europe was steaming in through the Industrial Era. Alexander II saw this as a need for change, primarily in response to the Crimean War, however to be able to do this, he also had to change the Russian society, therefore in 1861 he abolished serfdom, becoming the most significant events in Imperial Russian history, giving him the name as the ‘Tsar Liberator’ (Watts, Peter, History Review, 2014). However, although Alexander II’s reforms did pave the way for a more educated,…

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The largest factor in this public unrest was the Provisional Government’s insistence that Russia should continue fighting in the First World War. Millions of Russians had been killed, a large percentage of them ‘peasants in uniform’ – farmers who were untrained and unprepared for what awaited them. With so many farmers fighting or already dead, coupled with severe inflation due to lack of government control of the economy, huge food shortages swept across Russia.…

    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    History

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There were many reasons why the Romanov rule fell in the year 1917. I personally believe that the war was a major reason which led to the Tsar to abdicate but I also believe there are many other reasons which led to the Tsar to abdicate.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nicholas II would be the Tsar that Russia would ever have, the Romanov dynasty would wiped out along with Nicholas II and his family. The Tsar was a caring father and a dutiful husband which could ultimately be the reason he abdicated, to protect his family but ended the way in he and his family would die. Because of his abdication. Russia was facing a series of problems when Nicholas II came to the throne; he had a series of poor harvest in 1891, 1892, 1898 and 1901. To complement this situation there was a serious rise in population. In 1796 the rural population was 35 million and this represented 96.4% of the population, whereas in 1897 the…

    • 1556 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays