Preview

What Did Marx Say About The Bourgeois And The Proletariat

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
240 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Did Marx Say About The Bourgeois And The Proletariat
Marx on his theory talks about the bourgeois and the proletariat. On Robert Reich video, seems the to be the same division in class/wealth, however seems like the gap is bigger.
One of the points that caught my attention was the second one- “All the gains from the economy goes to the “super rich,” and less to the working class. This seems to correlate with Marx argument as he is very specific on how the bourgeois gets all the benefits, and the proletariat only will never get property, as their only asset is their labor. If most of the wealth goes to the “super rich” it makes sense the remaining of the wealth is distributed (not necessarily evenly) among the majority of the people. As is so limited, it is easy to assume proletariat will not
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Wealth Inequality In America Summary
    • 227 Words
    • 1 Page

    Wealth Inequality In America Summary

    After watching the video, "Wealth Inequality in America", published by Politizane, I was surprised when finding out that only the top one percent of America has 40 percent of all the nation's wealth. It was also surprising to discover that the top one percent owns half the country's stocks, bonds, and mutual bonds, while the bottom 50 percent of Americans own only half a percent of these investments. One of the notions I had that was challenged by the video was the amount of money the wealthy actually have compared to the rest of the classes. I was aware that wealth mostly distributed to the wealthy class, but I never imagined that the division between the wealthy class and the rest of the classes would be so huge. Its incredible that the CEO's…

    • 227 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Physilogy
    • 266 Words
    • 1 Page

    Physilogy

    1. Explain one way in which facilitated diffusion is the same as simple diffusion and one way in which it differs.…

    • 266 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    A Review on the Rich and the Rest of Us
    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A Review on the Rich and the Rest of Us

    Recently with the Presidential election campaign, a lot was said about the difference between the middle class and the rich. Especially with the tax cuts issue where tax cuts are being wanted for the middle class and the wealthy shall not be given any cuts. Any household that is earning anything more than $1 million per year should not be paying lesser income tax than what a middle class family does.…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Muckrakers Contribution To The Progressive Era
    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Muckrakers Contribution To The Progressive Era

    The gap between the upper class and everyone else widens to a point where the richest “4,000 families in the U.S” have as much wealth as “11.6 million…

    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Marx's Idea Of Bourgeoisie And Proletariat In Sweeney Todd
    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Marx's Idea Of Bourgeoisie And Proletariat In Sweeney Todd

    Karl Marx stated that the bourgeoisie are those that ‘have’ (typically business owners and such) and the proletariat is the working class. It’s similar to a couple of my favorite quotes from the Broadway Musical Sweeney Todd. One of them actually, from the song “No Place Like London”; it states that “At the top of the hole sit the privileged few making mock of the vermin in the lonely zoo…” The second is similar, stating “there are two kinds of men and only two: there's the one staying put in his proper place and the one with his foot in the other one's face” from “Epiphany”. I feel these two quotes really get Marx’s idea of bourgeoisie and proletariat.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Project Plan Overview Paper
    • 2105 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Project Plan Overview Paper

    Projects are used today as a way of achieving a variety of outcomes in local or international locations for new constructions, new product development, product improvement, process design, process improvement, utility installation, theory and technology development, and many more. Bringing a project to a successful conclusion requires the integration of numerous management functions like controlling, directing, team building, communication and others. It also requires cost and schedule management, technical and risk management, conflict and stakeholder 's management, and life cycle management.…

    • 2105 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mircoeconomics - article response
    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mircoeconomics - article response

    The article states that, “the rich are getting richer” as the World Wealth report explains there has been a rise of ten percent over the previous year for individuals with more than $1million to invest. Professor Krueger argues that reasons for this rise are due to technological changes, globalization and less emphasis on U.S. institutions that supported shared prosperity. On the other hand Professor Mankiw discusses that through “admirable entrepreneurs”, such as J.K. Rowling and Steve Jobs the middle class has become somewhat “richer”. Meaning, who else would’ve brought out these inventions and where would we be without them? Although, in this case, he doesn’t include individuals such as C.E.O’s who haven’t necessarily contributed to society but have gotten rich anyway. Mr Krueger argues that the main problem of the rich becoming richer is that it affects the middle class. The Global Wage Report points out that there hasn’t been any increase in the workers’ share nationally. Wages have not increased as much as labor productivity, meaning labor productivity has less little impact on wages. Furthermore, the article states that it will become harder for the individuals who don’t belong to the one percent to succeed.…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    marx and carnegie
    • 1118 Words
    • 4 Pages

    marx and carnegie

    For centuries, many philosophers have discussed the issue of class struggle. Karl Marx and Andrew Carnegie both developed theories of the unequal distribution of wealth a long time ago; however the only Carnegie’s ideology could apply to American society today. In “The Communist Manifesto”, Marx first introduces the two main social classes: bourgeois (the upper class) and proletarians (the lower class or working class). He points out the revolution of industrialism has made changes of Capitalism to Communism. He suggests that the rich should redistribute property evenly because the proletarians have put a lot effort contributing in the revolution. In contrast, Carnegie analyzes in “The Gospel of Wealth”, the unequal distribution of wealth is a natural consequence of civilization. Both Marx and Carnegie present the problem within society because they want to contribute their own experiences from various views to resolve the tension between the rich and poor efficiently.…

    • 1118 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    wealth inequality in america
    • 1528 Words
    • 5 Pages

    wealth inequality in america

    In today’s capitalist economy, where economic transactions and business in general is centered on self-interest, there is a natural tendency for some people to make more than others. That is the basis for the “American Dream,” where people, if they worked hard, could make money proportional to their effort. However, what happens when this natural occurrence grows disproportional in its allocation of wealth within a society? The resulting issue becomes income inequality. Where a small portion of the population, own the majority of the wealth and the majority of the population own only a fraction of what the rich own. This prominent issue has always been the subject of social tension from even before the French Revolution and spawns numerous other social issues in a society. In the more recent Occupy Movement, beginning in 2011, protesters used income inequality as a motive. Moreover, they were justified in doing so. In a 2010 statistic, it was revealed that the top 1% of America, own 35% of the wealth while the lower 80%, over the majority of the population, only have 11% of the nation’s wealth distributed between them. Financially the situation is even worse where the bottom 80% own only 5% of the financial wealth and the top 1% own 42% of the Nation’s financial wealth. Not to say the top 1% didn’t work hard to get to where they are, but according to the ideals of the “American Dream,” the top 1% should have worked 243 times harder than the average, not the poorest, worker in America. This extreme of disproportional wealth distribution is not only a source of social conflict, but a catalyst for various other problems that exist.…

    • 1528 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Inequality In The United States: An Economic Analysis
    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Inequality In The United States: An Economic Analysis

    The marketing crashes during 1928 and 2008 are symbolic as they prove that if they were not present then income inequality would have widened enormously. According to Reich, we are all vital when understanding the fundamental of the social class. We each play a role and the middle class is crucial to a stable economic system. How is it possible that the rich keep getting richer and the middle class just stay at their current class?…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    An Analysis Of Plutocrats By Chrystia Freeland
    • 881 Words
    • 3 Pages

    An Analysis Of Plutocrats By Chrystia Freeland

    In the world, there has always been a gap between rich and poor; however, in her book Plutocrats, Chrystia Freeland demonstrates that within the past few decades, the gap has grown significantly wider. The rich are becoming wealthier at such rapid speed that the middle class is being squeezed out. While the top ten percent of Americans on the income distribution receive more than half of the nation's income, Freeland demonstrates that it is actually the wealthiest 0.1 percent of citizens who are outpacing the rest of society the fastest, consequently refining what it means to be rich in the 21st century. These self-made oligarchs belong to a transglobal community and admit to having more in common with one another than they do with the rest of society. So what is driving this profound shift in income inequality, and how can we fix it?…

    • 881 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Class in America
    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Class in America

    He provided specific percentages in the middle rage of the economic spectrum. Also, he said the gap between rich and poor and between rich and the middle class is larger than it has ever been. Different class affects more than life-style and material well-being. Class standing has a significant impact on our chances for survival.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Industrialized Social Class
    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Industrialized Social Class

    Industrialization has changed social class from a Marxian social class with two social classes to the Gilbert-Kahl model divides the population into six classes. The top class is classed the Capitalist class, and they have $750,000 and above. They receive their wealth from the return on assets. These are the individuals who have enough money and wealth to donate to political campaigns. Their investments alone influence almost all of the working force. (Add more). The upper-middle class are second with $70,000 or more. These individuals are well educated, with college and graduate degrees, and well prepare their children to also attend college. In the work force, they work as managers and professionals. People in the upper-middle class are able to own their own houses and cars, which are symbols of status. A small part of the upper-middle class is the working rich whose would lose their wealth if they did not work. The middle class comes next, making about $40,000. Most individuals will have at least a high school diploma, but most have some other training but college. The most educated work as semi-professionals, while lower educated individuals work as low-level manages. The working class makes $25,000 and will make up one third of the population. These individuals have at least a high school diploma, and will have on the job…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Economic Inequality In The United States
    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Economic Inequality In The United States

    The rich hold a lot of the wealth and it’s like there is no equal spread in the wealth. It is like they are accumulating the wealth more and more. Economic inequality in a way affects political inequality. We have seen that economic inequality has made it more evident how big the gap is between the rich and the poor. This has made a really identifiable distinction between the poor and the rich in terms of lifestyle and career.…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Rich Are Different from You and Me
    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Rich Are Different from You and Me

    In the article “The Rich Are Different from You and Me,” author Chrystia Freeland explains the rising phenomenon of income inequality that is occurring between the richest top 10% and bottom 90% of the population. Chrystia Freeland states “In every society, some people are richer than others, but across time and geography, the gap between the rich and the rest has widely varied. The reality today is that the rich-especially the very, very rich- are vaulting ahead of everyone else” (51). Between the years of 2002 and 2007, income statistics show that the gap between the richest 10% and the bottom 90% of the population had significantly increased. Statistics also show that by 2007, approximately 35% of the wealth was maintained by the top 10%, leaving about 27% of wealth to the bottom 90% of the population. This is about an 8% gap in between. The last time income inequality was this high was in the 1920’s, but back then only 20% of wealth was gained from work. Today the top 10% gains at least 60% of their wealth from work, rather than inheritance. As economies throughout the world mature, income inequality will continue to rise. The gap between the rich and all others is primarily found in United States. Other countries such as Canada, China, and the United Kingdom are beginning to see income inequality as well. Freeland also states that “These global super- rich work and play together” (52). They share common interests such as business traveling, and vacationing around the world. Due to the common interests shared by others most like themselves, they have become separated from all others within the population, and have formed their own world governed by plutocracy. Author Chrystia Freeland is concerned that because the rich are so caught up in their world of wealth that they will not recognize that other…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics