Preview

What Does Cesare Borgia Cause Disobedience?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
285 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Does Cesare Borgia Cause Disobedience?
Throughout history, many great empires have fallen at the hands of compassionate or inept leaders who were incapable of asserting their authority of strident justice to maintain the loyalty and respect of those being governed. Without indisputable reverence, one cannot uphold law and order, inciting anarchy under the guise of an oppressive leader. For this reason, it is necessary for the “Prince” to demonstrate the willingness to administer cruel punishment against those whom have committed significant transgressions against the state in order to preserve stability within the homeland.

While the notion that inhumane treatment of others can sustain a stable and prosperous union may seem absurd, historically speaking, it has been a successful method in cultivating unity and balance. Namely Cesare Borgia, whose “cruelty had brought order to Romagna, united it, restored it to peace and obedience.” Whereas the benevolence of the people of Florentine ultimately led to the demise of Pistoia and similarly, the armies of Scipio rebelled a reluctance to mandate strong retribution. In other words, excessively merciful regimes provoke chaos, resulting in disarray and inevitably collapsing the system in place.
…show more content…
Nevertheless, it is crucial for those in power to retain support and admiration from the citizenry. To enumerate, Machiavelli states that in order to achieve this balance of love and cruelty, one must only execute punishment when it is obvious and just. The value in creating a harmonious relationship between two contradictory methods of rule is priceless as it offers a safeguard for continued rule. Be that as it may, it’s important to note that, “dread of punishment…will never abandon

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Leaders of countries or Princes must make decisions that not many will agree with, but are the best for the populace and he must make them, no matter the cost. Niccolo Machiavelli uses logos, ethos and distinct clear diction to prove the necessity for a ruler to be able to make unpopular decisions, in an excerpt from his book “the Prince” (1532).…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Proceeding to the other qualities mentioned above, I say that every prince must desire to be considered merciful and not cruel; nevertheless, he must take care not to misuse this mercy. Cesare Borgia was considered cruel; nonetheless, his cruelty had brought order to Romagna, united it, restored it to peace and obedience.” (Page 41). Cesare Borgia lived from 1476-1507. He was known for his brutality and lack of scruples, not to mention his exceptionally good luck. He was firm ruler, son of Pope Alexander VI. To support this George Wilson wrote, “The Prince has been much maligned as a work that advocates cruelty. But steadfastly concerned for the common good, the author distinguishes between well- and ill-used cruelties. He warns, for example, that in conquering and annexing a hereditary state, a prince will not be secure until he kills the entire bloodline of the former ruling family. The general community, however, is to be left alone to practice its familiar customs without interference. There are two concerns—to extinguish the family of the hereditary prince, the people whom the new prince has dispossessed, and to leave the taxes and laws of the community undisturbed. In other words, the prince should not subject the entire community but rather a select few to cruelty. These few unfortunates are victimized because doing so would secure the new prince's…

    • 1419 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gracchi Glory

    • 2365 Words
    • 10 Pages

    While the Gracchi brothers were motivated by the serious need for reform and equality in the Roman state, the methods they adopted led to both their political failure, and their violent, untimely ends. Both brothers were “genuinely committed to the interest of the people”[1], however the means adopted to fulfil their good intentions only led to tragedy and discontent. In attempting to implement political reform and break the monopoly…

    • 2365 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The understanding of human nature and the effects it has on the individual and society has been a serious topic in the philosophical world. Nicolo Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes were well known for their crucial roles in forming the foundation of political philosophy. While reading through Machiavelli’s The Prince and Hobbes’ Leviathan, both introduced a common focus on political theory even though living approximately 100 years apart. While learning about these two philosophers and their proposed theories, I noticed an innate relationship in the discussion of society’s human nature. Machiavelli ([1532] 2006) in The Prince theorizes the qualities that a dominant leader should have to gain and maintain power.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The professor Philip Hallie’s ‘From Cruelty to Goodness’ radiates unwavering genuine philanthropy which by its nature oppose the cruelty and imbalance of power he talks about. The understanding of how cruelty works goes through the understanding what cruelty is and what morality has to say about that. Professor Hallie recognizes two types of ethics- negative and positive- that illuminate the path of good-making. The negative is the ban for actions associated with deliberate harm-making and pain-inflicting on other human beings. The most significant negative ethical rules are the Ten Commandments, says the professor. As reverse, the positive rules enjoin actions that preserve human’s welfare. The positive ethics commands activity; demands courage, and takes sacrifice. The positive ethical rules are for the brave. In close association with the ethical rules, whether negative or positive, comes the question what cruelty is? Had we looked at the institutionalized type of cruelty from the near past to nowadays as the slavery, the Holocaust, the political prisons and the prisoner-of-war camps we would see the cruelty is not mere bloodshed, cut-off limbs, beatings and other atrocities which all are included though. The cruelty goes beyond that- it affects the self-respect, self-esteem, all of that which makes person a person and destroys it. So the cruelty not only (often) kills the body, it first kills the spirit, the soul, the life inside. As professor Hallie uncovers the cruelty derives from something so frequently seen as the imbalanced power in the relationship. The relationship could be both personal (private) or institutionalized. The imbalance is being born when the power between the two parties is unequally distributed, often leaving one of the parties with negligible or no power. Respectively, the strong party gains not only the power to decide for herself but to rule over the destiny of the powerless side. The imbalance of power resides in families, business…

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cesare Beccaria Theory

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In addition, the boys fail to effectively govern themselves based on Cesare Beccaria’s idea that a successful government must have an equal and fair justice system. Beccaria was a famous philosopher who lived through the 18th century and believed that it is vital for governments to establish a fair justice system in order to enforce the laws (“Cesare Beccaria”). He deduced that bad law enforcement promotes immorality in society and many innocent people may face punishments that they don’t deserve (“Cesare Beccaria”). Furthermore, Beccaria suggested that a reformed justice system would also match the level of punishment to the severity of the crime in order to maintain a balance (“Cesare Beccaria”). This theory states that an effective government requires an equitable and equal justice system, because without this component, anarchy is bound to overcome…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Introduction: Many people who have read The Prince by Niccoló Machiavelli were appalled by Machiavelli’s fierce and authorative tone he used to assert his ideas, especially his concept of how the ends justify the means, which slowly made people begin to criticize him and his book as immoral, wicked, and evil. For this reason, Machiavelli began to be insulted as a ruthless and evil person, or in the adopted term, a Machiavellian. Machiavelli didn’t wish to care for morals or spiritual integrity; however, he didn’t arrange to establish the approach to wickedness. As a matter of fact, he argues that the concept the ends justify the means are meant to be followed, but only when necessary commands for it to happen.…

    • 2621 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Obama the Machiavellian

    • 3380 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Residing in the Florence Italy during the Renaissance, the founder of modern political science, Niccolo Machiavelli, was well known for his harsh political views. During this time period most European countries began to unite into powers while Italy was still comprised of city-states and controlled by dominant families. The motivation for Machiavelli’s famous literature came from the desire to fix the failed republic he was living in. His theories stemmed from politician’s military defenses he witnessed in Florence and other historical events. In his famous book, Machiavelli states his ideas on how a successful prince should act as the head of his people. He elaborates on the ideas of how a prince’s appearance should differ from reality, the proper tactics of war and peace, the appropriate way to gain favor of people and soldiers, drawing lines between liberality and meanness, and most importantly whether it is better to be loved or feared. Over the past four years the United States has witnessed how Obama has implemented his ideas of “change” on the United States; with deeper analysis of his “change” he has revealed similar qualities to Machiavelli’s ideal Prince.…

    • 3380 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Petrarch and Machiavelli

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the fourteenth century, the humanist philosopher Francesco Petrarch wrote a letter entitled How a Ruler Ought to Govern His Sate. Nearly a century later, another philosopher by the name of Niccolo Machiavelli wrote a book about governing, The Prince. The two documents show many similarities in content and theme. While the two wrote in similar subject matter, it is clear that these philosophers possess distinctly different viewpoints on how a ruler should govern. In Petrarch’s How a Ruler Ought to Govern His Sate and Machiavelli’s The Prince, both philosophers possess different opinions on how a ruler ought to govern. In particular Machiavelli pays specific attention to the importance of appearing like a good ruler. There is much evidence to support this in the readings.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Machiavelli and Odysseus

    • 4351 Words
    • 18 Pages

    This book studies the lessons of Machiavelli on leadership and how they can be applied to modern politics. Michael A. Ledeen’s personal view on the importance of Machiavellian leadership will be used as a tool to back up my claims on why the consequences that Odysseus suffered throughout his journey were the results of his leadership decisions that contradicted the guidelines of Machiavelli. In one case in the book that indicates the importance of inserting fear in the people under one’s leadership, Leeden uses George Washington as an example by illustrating how the former U.S. president used his army to control the citizens who were against the idea of paying excise tax on their liquor.…

    • 4351 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The world has seen plenty of tyrants: Napoleon Bonaparte, Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, and Hugo Chávez are only some. All of these men have committed absolutely unspeakable crimes against humanity, and their names should be in the history books as such. However, more people should rebuke the consent of the masses, for the wickedness of ordinary people can be just as horrifying as the heinous crime of a serial killer or a sadistic head of state.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The people in rule are not always the just people. During the time of The Republic, incentives as well as honor were two attributes that hose who ruled would receive. To an unjust person, these things were desires in their own power-hungry world. To a just man, these things would be arbitrary. To a just man it isn't about outdoing other people, while to an unjust man outdoing everyone is a goal in order to achieve all the glory that would accompany him when he reached the peak.…

    • 2081 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the 1500s, governmental control was limited but powerful as seen in The Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet. The Prince chooses not to act upon his initial threat of death to anyone who feuds with one of the opposite family: “Go hence, to have more talk of these sad things/some shall be pardoned and some punished” (5.3.306-307). He shows that all governmental control does not have to be oppressive and the government will pardon people who truly deserve it. As the governmental figure of Verona, the Prince has to be harsh when issuing reprimands; however, he chooses to follow his judgment and pardon those he feels were not involved enough to be punished. The Prince’s decisions show how governmental control does not have to be terrible and restricting. The Prince clearly states how all the feuding members of the Capulet and the Montague families will be killed if they have any more public clashes.…

    • 1486 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lead with Example

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Stability in a ruler’s morals and ethics are a vital asset to have when ruling a group of people. With similarities shared between the ruler and the common person the ruler will then be able to relate and be more respected amongst the population, as opposed to a ruler who rules with his own self interest at hand. In the piece, The Prince, Niccolò Machiavelli argues the many principles of how a prince should and should not rule. In order to rule successfully he states a prince must possess some of the following characteristics; morality, a strong army, strict rule, common ground with his people and also to be widely respected. Machiavelli laid the ground work for many rulers in the future with his modern view in a time where rulers were primitive and ruled through fear and terror. The Prince and its ideas can even be seen today in our modern day presidents and kings proving that Machiavelli had compelling ideas and arguments for how leaders can obtain and hold a position of power successfully.…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Non Violent Revolutions

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Violence against violence is only the most logical way to expel overpowering executives. Government has used brutality to keep their citizens “in check” since the beginning of time. Violence is natural to humans. Humanity has always known this concept of cruelty and it is impossible to avoid. Karl Peter Heinzen was a notable author who wrote a pamphlet advocating violent revolutions. The pamphlet emphasized the use of violence to allow change in government. Avoiding the use of cruelty and barbarity will result in avoiding a future where real change is enabled everywhere in society (Heinzen 10). The reality is humanity is shaped by brute force. By avoiding violence, the citizens are avoiding a different and better future. Violent revolutions should be considered legitimate because totalitarian governments are allowed to get away with “legal” murder everyday. The inhabitants are just guarding themselves from the ferocious regimes. Karl Heinzen’s pamphlet also argues the legitimacy of violent revolutions. “It was my object to vindicate not only the aims of revolution, but also its means, including assassination and to render it as legitimate as the tyrants have done with their murder by war, their ‘legal’ murder, their murder by ‘court-martial’” (Heinzen 12). Violent governments have always used “legal” murder to control their citizens. The…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays