What Is Better Than Rome Have A Better System For Citizenship

Some people believe Rome had a better system for citizenship, not in fact Athens system for citizenship is better. In 500 B.C.E Athens established a direct democracy. People have been arguing about this question, whom developed the better citizenship system Athens, or Rome? Better is defined as that which has a greater excellence, or is preferable or wiser. Athens citizenship made more sense because of three reasons: all citizens are equal, they had the power to ostracize, and they had full participation in there assemblies.

Athens system was stronger because it gave citizens “equal rights and full political participation” once granted citizenship. “In the Roman Republic, not all citizens received the same rights or the same political participation” which gives the Athenian system a greater reputation. (DOC.C) To become a citizen you had to complete education and two years of military training before granted citizenship which ensured that when the non-citizen became a citizen they would love Athens more because they had to fight for the city-state. The education made each of the citizens more eligible to choose the correct leaders based on who is fit to run. (DOC.A)
This meant that everybody got the power to vote to ban a person from Athens for 10 years. This gave citizens a lot of power and also responsibility. Roman population was ranked into distinct classes. Ranking was “based on wealth, heritage, administrative competence, marital status, and physical/moral fitness determined the citizens political privileges.” This ranking system could corrupt the government by making certain people political leaders just by being celebrities or paying people.