Hargreaves’ and Ravitch’s argument hinges on drawing comparisons between the medical and educational professions. In medicine, both refer to the fact that research is largely conducted by medical practitioners themselves, who are able to utilise and build upon previous findings. Hargreaves and Ravitch praise the medical profession for its accumulation of research that focuses on what treatments work for specific illnesses. Hargreaves argues that advancements in medicine can be largely attributed to the constant and consistent accessing and contributing to research by practitioners. Due to the common language and the readily available literature which is understandable within the medical world, much progress has been made. The nature of medicine is informed around fact, which is based on a combination of observation and scientific method.
According to Hargreaves, education, on the other hand, has relied upon psychology, sociology, philosophy and history as its knowledge base. Its reliance on the social