What Is Teens Playing Gta 5 Argumentative Essay

After fully reading your diabolical article about teens playing ‘Grand Theft Auto 5’ I strongly disagree also being against your argument. Continuously you produced multiple faults within your investigation; in addition, you gathered some ridicules results. To improve you could consider repeating your test with the improvements I am going to state to get more reliable along with accurate results.
Initially a considerable statement you presented in your article was that ‘GTA 5’ makes teens act more aggressively and be enraged. You would need to back this up by testing all the teens before, not just after playing ‘GTA 5’ as well as for at least three hours otherwise I cannot agree with the statement. Furthermore, you have tested only “130,000
people” (not even all teens) even “52.5 million people have brought the game therefore you haven’t even tested half the teens possibly playing the game, so how will this article be accurate? I appreciate you can’t test every teen that has played or is playing the game, even still only “130,000 people” isn’t enough to make it reliable. Yes, ‘GTA 5’ is enraging at times, it’s not always due to violent reasons within the game, however possibly due to requiring getting to a specific destination far away. It’s still also possible to get angry at “Mini Gold 3D” from losing a game against family members. As well as another error within your incorrect article is that you have written “the effects occurred in male along with female of all ages”, your statement is about teens playing the game, isn’t it? But you have done tests with adults also, being more reason to doubt your results. I apprehend your argument, but dishonesty does not support your statements and results in me believing that it’ an unreliable article. Whether or not you’re trying to prove statement dishonesty to your readers is a significant incorrect action to perform.
Continuing, GTA 5 can also apparently affect teen’s health now.
It’s ridiculous, how you did a test, including multiple people (not even all teens) testing them to see the amount of sweets they ate, according to your results people playing GTA 5 ate three times more sweets as the teenagers that play the video game ‘Mini Golf 3D’. How? How did you know what the teens ate before your investigation? You never even mentioned in the article whether they were large eaters or not; or small eaters, or possibly allergic to the sweets you supplied to them. So why should I trust you again. On the other hand, I see possible reasons for why the teens playing GTA 5 ate more sweets. It’s a result of them being more involved into the game, enjoying themselves while subconsciously eating the food; furthermore teens would eat more sweets if they're hungry or not making your investigation invalid. I acknowledge the fact that ‘GTA 5’ possibly results in less self-control as personally when playing the game myself, I know it's caused by addiction to the game. This is fairly common with teens, but also common with every other game violence or not, for example Sims “mini gold 3D”. Consequently, this does affect their social life; school grades, appalling attitude, home chores and more. But your investigation doesn’t represent your statement correctly. Along the same idea you have implied that playing “GTA 5” could lead to more cheating. How can you test this, everyone is different therefore would
act on the decision differently with the game or not. Again, you need to test your people before to have a true point and able to back yourself up.
Even more when you tested your people you made them play the game for “35 minutes “,”35 minutes “! That’s not long enough, maybe one week, If was required to play “Mimi golf 3D” for one week I would go mad.