Preview

What Is The Stanley Milgram Experiment

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
859 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Is The Stanley Milgram Experiment
Stanley Milgram Experiment
The video I watched was a reenactment of the original Stanley Milgram experiment conducted by Derren Brown. In the experiment, the subjects were told that they were doing an experiment on how punishment could affect learning. They were tricked into thinking that they picked their own roles when they actually got the teacher roles and the actor got the learner role on purpose. They started the experiment by showing them what they were going to do to the “learner”. They were put in a room with an electricity generator that was going to shock the learner/actor in the next room. Each time the learner got an answer wrong they had to raise the electric shock that was given to the learner. Over 50% of the people gave up
…show more content…
Shocking someone just because it’s an experiment isn’t a good enough reason for me. I’m one of those people who can’t stand watching someone get hurt. That one guy that suggested that they put more notches on the generator really made me go
“What the heck dude”! What kind of person would say such a thing? A future murderer, that’s who! How would he like it if he was the one getting the shocks? People like that make me feel like actually hurting them so they can see that pain is not something that is funny and be wished upon other people just because. The people who actually stopped the experiment are actually sane people who know that fact even though it took them a while to do so. They got a taste of how it would feel so they should know.

The Bystander Effect
The second video I watched was called “The Bystander Effect”. The purpose of this experiment was to see what a person would do if they saw another person lying out on the street. Would they stop and offer help or would they simply ignore the person and keep on walking? The performances were made out on the pavement outside the
London Liverpool Street Station. The first act was a drunk with really bad wear that
…show more content…
The third act was an actress this time who was just acted as a normal lady who wasn’t a drunk but wasn’t of good wear either. She had to wait almost 5 minutes to get attention by two people! The fourth act was the same actor from the first and second act. The actor wore casual wear and acted in pain, nobody helped.
This video really made me disappointed in humanity. How can they not do anything? They think they’re too good to help the person in need! Are they not thinking of how the person in need might be feeling? I would like to get help if I’m lying on the street and in pain! If I’m dieing I would like to NOT die alone! I would like to be by my loving family! People really need to start putting themselves in other people's shoes and think of their feelings and needs! Who would like to be left lying alone on a street with no help and in need of help? Not me! The last act where the actor acted in pain and nobody helped really, but really, got me mad. What monsters they are!

78 Year Old Man Gets Hit By Car and No­One Helps
The third video I watch is called “78 Year Old Man Gets Hit By Car and No­One
Helps”. This short video shows an elderly man walking to get across the road. When

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    According to the findings of Milgram’s experiment, individuals including those who knew each other would indeed harm others if subjected to the experimental situations in Milgram’s experiment because under extreme conditions, people would do anything. If the teachers were men and the women were learners, the level of conformity would be high because in most societies, the system in operation is patriarchal and as such, men would have undue influence on the actions of women. Teenagers would deviate from the norm in some instances and in some conform to what they are instructed to do depending on the cultural set up they were brought up in, with the majority obeying the orders of the elders.…

    • 158 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The experiment would require a “teacher” and a “learner.” (Nevid & Rathus, P. 244). The tests showed that if the learner made an error; a very painful shock would be transferred to their body from the teacher. The learners obviously did not like the experiment showing signs of pain and discomfort. Most of the teachers would take delight in the suffering of the learners and would continue the experiment knowing the pain and torment the learner would go through.…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the experiment, Milgram recruited the "teachers," who were actually the unknowing subjects of the experiment. They were asked to administer an electric shock of increasing intensity to a learner for each mistake he made during the experiment. The experiment consisted of the teacher administering a list of paired associates to the learner, to test him on the list and to then to punish him for the errors. The fictitious story given to these teachers was that the experiment was exploring effects of punishment for the incorrect responses on learning behavior. The teacher, however, was not aware that the learner in the study was an actor that was not actually being shocked. The experiment was conducted to measure the level of discomfort and moral dilemma the teacher felt as he increased the electric shocks. When the teacher asked the administrators…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some teachers even believed they had badly hurt, or even killed the learner, causing a lot of distress (Nairne 435) (http://smilgram.weebly.com/ethical-concerns.html, 2014) Consent-Participants volunteered for the study, so they did at least agree to take part. It can be argued that this is not good enough and that informed consent must be given. Whether participants did have a right to withdraw is a complicated issue. When the participants expressed a wish for the experiment to be stopped, the experimenter ordered “the teacher to continue with the procedure with disregard of the learner’s protest s” (Milgram 1963).…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays
    • 2183 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays
    • 1608 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    What is The Milgram Experiment? It is one of the most famous social science studies of obedience in psychology ever conducted. This experiment was carried out by Stanley Milgram, a psychologist at Yale University, in 1963. He conducted this experiment focusing on the conflict between obedience to authority and personal conscience in which a large proportion of subjects complied with an experimenter’s instructions to deliver painful and potentially lethal shocks to a fellow participant. Milgram’s findings of the experiment invoked to explain atrocities ranging from the Holocaust to the torture of prisoners where individuals claimed that they were just following orders. Stanley Milgram was interested in researching how far people would go in…

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Milgram Experiment

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Milgram's experiment showed that when placed in a situation of pressure, people tend to conform to the requests of an authority figure, because they would have no responsibility over their own actions by obeying commands. Even though some subjects stopped…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays
    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Volunteers were enrolled for a lab experiment that dug into learning and ethics. There were 40 males between the ages of 20 to 50 with varied careers. During the experiment there were three roles; a teacher (role of the volunteers), a learner (an actor), and the experimenter. The teacher was asked to administer increasingly sever eclectic shocks to the learner for every incorrect or silent answer given. The shock levels were labeled from 15 to 450 volts. Along with a numerical scale, words such as moderate shock, strong shock, intense shock, danger, and even XXX were added to the scale. The twist is that since the learner was simply an actor, there were no “actual” shocks given, just a verbal response from the learner acting as if the shocks were real. At 75 volts, the leaner began to moan, at 120 they would complain, and at around 285 they let out screams and cries of intense pain. This caused some teachers to not want to continue with the experiment. The experimenter gave commands such as “please continue”, too more aggressive commands like “the experiment requires that you continue” to try to keep the teacher engaged in the…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Milgram Experiment Essay

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Once the experiment begins the learner is tied down to a chair. The teacher is then put in a room opposite of the learner and is not able to see the learner. The purpose of the learner is to remember the line that the teacher reads to them and repeat it back. The teacher can only read through the first page once. Then the teacher would read the second page which asked questions about what word goes next in the line. If the learner answers correctly the…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Milgram Experiment Essay

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As the shocks became more painful to the learner, and the reactions more dramatic. The teacher was more reluctant to continuing the experiment. The scientist told the experimenter…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Milgram's Experiment Essay

    • 2955 Words
    • 12 Pages

    After reading, analyzing, and doing a lot of research about The Behavioral Study of Obedience, I have reached the following conclusion: Milgram’s experiment went too far. Even though his experiment is qualified as a success because 26 out 40 participants completely obeyed, for me this experiment is not about obedience at all. For me, it was a set up where the participants felt trapped and didn’t have an idea of how to end the situation. The unethical approach that Milgram took to demonstrate his hypothesis is unacceptable for my moral principles. Milgram’s experiment played with the moral fiber of the participants. They had to choose to be immoral by administering shocks to the learner which in the end would be the responsibility of the experimenter or be immoral because they were willing to cooperate after being paid to do so and accepting the right of the prestigious university to conduct immoral allegedly safe experiments.…

    • 2955 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There has been so many situations involving people not helping others in a situation where they are hurt,when they have been hurt, where they are in need of assistance, or people witnessing a crime involving someone getting hurt, we can refer to them as bystanders, or sometimes we can refer it as the bystander effect. This is a common, for instance, in different parts of the world, itś not just here in California, itś in so many places, but we probably don't pay so much attention to this situation. This is when different types of situations have occurred, for instance, in Chicago four teenagers were charged for kidnapping another teen; however he was white, they kidnapped and tortured him, they did so many things to him, the worst of all he…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Milgram

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Milgram (1963) article is about an experiment that was conducted on the Yale University campus on obedience. A newspaper ad and mailers were sent out to advertise for participants for an experiment that offered 4.50 just to show up and brought in 40 participants ranging in age, education level and occupation. The participants were told that the study had to do with memory and that one participant would be the learner and the other would be the teacher. The teacher would be responsible for shocking the learner every time that learner got a wrong answer and that each time the learner was shocked, the voltage of that shock would have to increase with the highest level of shock being clearly labeled as dangerous on the fake -but very professional looking- shocking machine. The participants did not know that the learner was a trained person working with the experimenter. Although a low amount of people were predicted to obey the experimenter in giving the more painful shocks, most participants did and over half of them administered shocks all the way up to the highest one.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays