Thierry has no clue about art. In Thierry’s perspective art is a visual, but to banksy and Shepard Fairey art is more than just a visual. To them art is a way to communicate a deep message without the need to of saying it. An example of this is when Banksy made that graffiti of lips …show more content…
An example of this is when a youtuber got a Lamborghini and decided to do a review on it, even though he had no clue about cars. This is what it sounded like, “there is the engine, it look very cool but because it's a Lamborghini it gets every hot. So hot, that if I put my hand on it, it will melt.” He clearly has no clue about cars, because if he had any idea about engines he would know why the engine is “so hot”. There are explosions happening in your car every second, and and as we know combustion creates a lot of heat. Therefore, making the engine hot. It’s not just a “Lamborghini” engine that get that hot, every engine gets that hot. As a matter of fact, every engine “operating temperature” is hot enough to melt a hand. Another example is when Apple released the new IPhone 6s, everyone went to the store to get one. They had no clue what they changed, when I asked them they said “the camera is better and it has a larger battery.” This was really funny, because if you go and read the specs, they actually made the battery smaller to accomodate a better camera and couple other features. Their perspective on an IPhone is, newer is better. Which is sort of true, but most of the features that are included will never be used. An example of this would be an accelerometer, have any you ever used an accelerometer? Probably not, then why do you need it in your phone? But they have to buy it because in