In this moment, you have the option of forcing your fiancé to leave the family behind.
If you choose to leave the man, you will finally have justice for your family. The murderer will not only undergo a painful, slow death, but will also learn to suffer the grief of losing someone precious to him. You know that if you get out now, your fiance can get medical help and he will be saved. However, you and your fiancé will live the rest of your life in guilt for being one of the causes of the death of two innocent kids. On the other hand, you can listen to your fiancé's wishes and abandon him in order to save the trapped family. If you save the man, your fiancé will undoubtedly die because you will have to abandon him. However, his final wish will be granted and he can die in peace, knowing that his sacrifice will save innocent children. Making this decision will cause you a lifetime of regret for being responsible for the death of your beloved fiancé. Either verdict in this dilemma is going to result in a death, hence, you must settle on a choice
quickly. If I were in this predicament, I would probably save the family for a couple reasons. Firstly, if I were in the father's position, I would most definitely want someone to save my children. Secondly, leaving the children for the sake of revenge would be extremely inhumane. This may sound ironic compared to what their father did, but adding fuel to the fire won't help anyone, including myself. Thirdly, being the easily guilt-ridden person that I am, I don't think I would be able to handle the aftermath of my 'revenge'. I think this decision would cause both my fiancé and I an excruciating amount of pain if we were to bear the shame of being accountable for the deaths of two children. Therefore, I would rather suffer alone than have my fiancé suffer with me. Although my fiancé will die, at least he will die as a hero and by choice, and even if I end up miserable for the rest of my life, at least I will know that my actions were in pursuit of saving two more lives.