What is wrong with adultery

Evaluating Adultery Bonnie Steinbock in her essay “What’s Wrong with Adultery?” starts by quoting the data from studies to show that the number of women who have committed adultery has significantly increased. Despite this increase in female adultery, it is in some degree due to the attitudes changing toward sex and sexuality, but Steinbock thinks that people should use rational justification to evaluate the disapproval of adultery. Then in the rest of the parts of Steinbock’s essay, she is generally arguing against adultery based on the plausible claim that our views toward adultery are varied, and these views are bound to be connected to important conventions about marriage, fidelity, romantic love ( Romeo and Juliet’s case ), the family, jealousy, and exclusivity ( Lewis 500 ). Even though Steinbock’s essay is well presented, the arguments contained in her essay are topically only somewhat sound and somewhat valid. First, Steinbock makes her essay strong by transparently stating that adultery contradicts moral principles because it involves promise-breaking and lying. A broken promise by one person to be faithful to another is a basic violation of trust. In the other words, a promise of sexual fidelity is pertaining to sex and romantic love. Breaking this promise is a typical sign of betrayal toward “true love.” Lying is another way which is like promise breaking to create distrust, and lying itself is a sort of wrong-doing. As a result of the betrayal and lies, adultery can simply hurt one’s spouse. Since the moral principles are obeyed and believed by most people in our society, adultery should be banned, unacceptable, and thought to be immoral in most cases. Steinbock argues against adultery through a moral approach which meets the mainstream values of our society and should be considered as a strong part of her essay. In addition, besides talking about the strong part of her essay, the weak parts of her essay should also be reviewed. First, in the “trust