Preview

Committing Adultery

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
625 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Committing Adultery
Committing Adultery

A marriage is full of moral ethics that should be followed. Kant would have agreed with me that we have moral duties to ones self and others. A marriage is committing moral thoughts, words, and actions to yourself and your spouse. Kant believed in treating other people the way you wish they would treat you. Never treat other people as if they were merely things. The formula of humanity states that we should treat people as an end and never as a means to an end. In committing adultery, the marriage and the spouse are being used as a means. Marriage should be treated with dignity and not as a thing that can be played with. I hope no one would apply the universal law of categorical imperative to committing adultery. I could not imagine applying the act of committing adultery to how all others should act. If we did apply the universal law to committing adultery then marriage would be worthless. Basically, do not choose a rule for yourself that you wouldn’t want everyone else to obey. Kant believes that the only good thing is a good will. Good will equals good intentions. Committing adultery is not a morally good act and Kant would agree with me.
Utilitarianism is an action that is right if it maximizes the overall happiness of all people. In other words, an action is morally right if the consequences of that action are more favorable than unfavorable to everyone. This is consequentialism. Utilitarianism has rule utilitarianism and act utilitarianism. In rule utilitarianism, a behavioral code or rule is morally right if the consequences of the rule are more favorable than unfavorable to everyone. I believe it is more favorable to your spouse not to cheat than to cheat. I would be also more favorable to you not to cheat so the spouse doesn’t get upset. Act utilitarianism weighs the consequences of each particular action. There is a list of consequences of the act of committing adultery and none of them are good. There are

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The act of adultery is wrong, inexcusable, and most definitely immoral. As human beings, we all have impulses and desires and sometimes we fall victim to them, but adultery is in no way justifiable. The forbidden fruit that both Adam and Eve ate without reparations in their mind is similar to infidelity. To expand, Adam and Eve fell victim to temptation after witnessing the fruit in all its glory and so Adam and Eve ate the fruit of good and evil in the Garden of Eden. Despite the warnings and commands by God to not eat the Forbidden Fruit, they still did because they simply couldn't resist. As the story goes, they ultimately opposed the words of God and indulged in immoral pleasure (“Adam and Eve”, n.d.). In the Book of Enoch in 1 Enoch 31:4,…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Adultery has remained an idea inherently wrong through particularly American culture for generations. Monotonous relationships are throughout the culture and many can empathize or relate from personal experience that negative emotions and effects adultery has on people. The immediate reaction to call it wrong comes from sharp and vivid emotions likely betrayal and heartbreak and for anyone who has experienced or seen these the action that caused this is inexcusable.…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    These laws are practiced and preached by nearly a third of all 6.9 billion people on Earth. Despite widespread agreement on Christian moral value in these rules, they are often and continually broken by society. “Thou shall not commit adultery.” People sometimes wonder if an exception is allowed in case the spouse cannot or will not have sex, or if the couple is separated, or for other reasons. However, the Bible does not mention any possible exceptions. Therefore, as long as a couple is legally married, sex with anyone else is considered adultery. There must be overwhelming reasons for people attempting to cheat on their spouse or significant other; otherwise it would not keep happening. We can look for different reasons, excuses and validations for the cause, some people may simply be tired of going through the motions with their spouse and are looking for a one-night stand. Others may simply feel the need to do something daring and exhilarating as a break from their mundane lives. Whatever the motive is behind extramarital affairs, it does not negate the repercussions or consequences that follow when the affair is revealed. Open marriage is definitely an unexplored territory for me as far as understanding the ideas and justifications of it. I had to read several articles and journals from scholarly sources as how to approach this issue from an unbiased non-judgmental point of view. From what I gather, the…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bonnie Steinbock in her essay “What’s Wrong with Adultery?” starts by quoting the data from studies to show that the number of women who have committed adultery has significantly increased. Despite this increase in female adultery, it is in some degree due to the attitudes changing toward sex and sexuality, but Steinbock thinks that people should use rational justification to evaluate the disapproval of adultery. Then in the rest of the parts of Steinbock’s essay, she is generally arguing against adultery based on the plausible claim that our views toward adultery are varied, and these views are bound to be connected to important conventions about marriage, fidelity, romantic love ( Romeo and Juliet’s case ), the family, jealousy, and exclusivity ( Lewis 500 ). Even though Steinbock’s essay is well presented, the arguments contained in her essay are topically only somewhat sound and somewhat valid. First, Steinbock makes her essay strong by transparently stating that adultery contradicts moral principles because it involves promise-breaking and lying. A broken promise by one person to be faithful to another is a basic violation of trust. In the other words, a promise of sexual fidelity is pertaining to sex and romantic love. Breaking this promise is a typical sign of betrayal toward “true love.” Lying is another way which is like promise breaking to create distrust, and lying itself is a sort of wrong-doing. As a result of the betrayal and lies, adultery can simply hurt one’s spouse. Since the moral principles are obeyed and believed by most people in our society, adultery should be banned, unacceptable, and thought to be immoral in most cases. Steinbock argues against adultery through a moral approach which meets the mainstream values of our society and should be considered as a strong part of her essay. In addition, besides talking about the strong part of her essay, the weak parts of her essay should also be reviewed. First, in the “trust…

    • 1686 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Don Marquis’ “What’s Wrong with Adultery” he gives several examples of why adultery can be used or justified in a marriage. He brings up issues like one partner agreeing to a marriage contract but not fulfilling their side of the contract in the marriage. Another point he uses is one spouse not fulfilling the others desire in the “sex and love” department (213). Adultery is a sinful word for many; while some have justifications for the act. I believe that adultery is morally permissible in some cases.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kant's Humanity Formula

    • 1663 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Kant's way of determining morality of actions is quite different from other philosophers, and many find it extremely hard to grasp or implausible. The central concept of his basic test for morality found in his Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals is the categorical imperative. "The representation of an objective principle, insofar as it is necessitating for a will, is called a command (of reason), and the formula of the command is called an imperative"(Kant, 24). In other words, an imperative is something that a will ought or shall do because the will is obligated to act in a way in which conforms to moral law. Imperatives can also be referred to as the supreme principle of morality.…

    • 1663 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Adultery Hurts

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Not only will your spouse be injured by the adultery but anyone close to you will be affected negatively. Children, family, and friends all those who care about you will suffer if you make the choice to engage in an adulterous relationship.…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Categorical Imperatives

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The first (universal law formulation) “Act only on that maxim through which you can at the same time will that is should become a universal law” In other words whatever moral law (maxim) you chose to adopt, would it make rational sense for everyone to adopt it as well? If so, then let that moral law guide whatever course of action is open to you.…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Act Utilitarianism is the treatment of each type of moral situation as a unique situation, therefore bring the maximum amount of happiness to everyone that is affected by the act. The agent in these types of situations must determine what is the right things that should be done for this exact situation in present time. The agent must not be bogged down by past experiences, as that will affect the judgment of what to do in this particular situation. While this type of utilitarianism is good in a variety of situation, especially in situations that rarely happen so they require a conclusive determination in judgment, it is hard for people to judge each individual act on an individual basis. It is impractical to have to judge every single action…

    • 2060 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are 2 main types of utilitarianism, the first I will talk about is Rule. Rule utilitarianism has certain principles involved with it, and from these, certain actions that we commit are able to be deemed as unacceptable. The principle of utility is therefore applied to a rule so the rule will stay if it leads to greater happiness for more people. This therefore means that if you do something bad that may lead to many people being happy, it could go against a rule or principle that has been set down in Rule…

    • 616 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant’s moral argument focuses on reason, good will, duty and the notion that we ought to strive towards moral perfection (Summum Bonum). He believes that people are ruled by a ‘moral law’. This moral law for Kant was universal and objective. An example of this might be seen in the wide scale agreement that murder or torture is wrong. There seems to be agreement across cultures that certain actions are intrinsically wrong. This, for Kant, suggests that there is a universal objective moral law. He believed that the highest form of goodness was the notion of good will, namely that someone would freely choose to do good for no reward whatsoever, only for the sake of goodness. Moreover, Kant believed that we have a moral duty to do such good things. He would argue that we have an awareness of what is right and wrong and that good will should make us act accordingly as reason dictates this to be the case. In a way it doesn’t make any rational sense to act in an immoral way.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kantian Perspective Kant

    • 1714 Words
    • 7 Pages

    According to Kant, categorical imperative is the basis of morality which is determined by a persons’ intent rather than their action. It is motivated by pure reasoning and must apply to everyone regardless of preference. For this reason, Kant introduced the principle of universalizability. It is a three part test using questions to determine if our actions are being universally consistent, fair or selfish. Kant also believes the only good without qualification is good will and only the action performed for the sake of duty are moral. Kant was committed to treating everyone with value, dignity and respect. Even today, Kant’s theories still have a direct impact on how morality is…

    • 1714 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Adultery Wrong

    • 220 Words
    • 1 Page

    Another problem with consequentialism is that the theory maintains that wrongness and rightness are not found in the action itself, but in the ramifications of it. The absurdity of this claim can be best seen with an example; adultery isn’t wrong in itself, but it is wrong when harmful effects are the result. More specifically, adultery is wrong if it causes the spouse harm, but morally correct if the result is a stronger marriage and a deeper connection. Calling adultery moral reveals the folly of consequentialism, and yet another reason why the moral rightness of an action cannot be determined by its corresponding consequences.…

    • 220 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Shameful Affair

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the following essay, Simpson discusses images of nature and society in "A Shameful Affair."…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism as most know view that in order to determining what we should do, we must consider what specific act would produce the best overall consequences. They view the ethical goal is to lead is a life rich in pleasure or happiness both in point of quantity and quality for…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics