Preview

What Made Non Violence Work

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1138 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Made Non Violence Work
Gandhi and Mandela: What Made Non-Violence Work?

Background Essay The history of violence in the world is well documented. However it is also possible to use non-violence to bring about change. This DBQ will look at two countries where a non-violent movement was successful.

Historic Context India and South Africa were two important nations on two different continents. But although they looked strong on the outside, each one suffered from a disease that threatened the health of the whole. For India, the disease was colonization. For South Africa, it was racial segregation.

Three Conditions In each of these nations three conditions help explain why non-violence worked. The first condition was that both of them had been colonies of England. And like England both countries thought law was very powerful – more powerful even than government officials.

The second condition was the presence of violence. Without the possibility of a violent revolution, the government might not have been willing to change.

The third condition was the presence of a leader – Mohandas Gandhi in India and Nelson Mandela South Africa. Each of these men was so charismatic he could lead his followers to a non-violent victory. Both of them gave their lives to the cause. Gandhi was shot by an assassin while Mandela spent almost twenty-seven years of his life in prison. These are their stories.

Mohandas Gandhi – “An eye-for-an-eye only makes the whole world blind” Mohandas Gandhi was born in 1869, in Porbandar, India. His father taught his son respect for all religions. His mother taught him that all living things are holy. Following custom, Gandhi married at age 13; his wife, Kasturbai, was even younger. At age 19 he went to London to study law, and at age 22 Gandhi completed his studies. He now felt more than ever that the English, who had ruled India for almost two centuries, were law-abiding and fair. Hopes high, he sailed for

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Mahatma Gandhi, who was born on October 2, 1869, in Porbandar, Kathiawar, India. Gandhi stayed in India until he decided to travel to England in 1888 to get his Law degree. In 1893 Gandhi traveled to South Africa to pursue a job as a barrister, where he experienced the extent of discrimination towards Indians in South Africa .Gandhi was traveling to the Transvaal province of South Africa by train where he was asked to move back to the third-class car even though he had a first class ticket. Gandhi refusing to make the change was thrown off the train. After being thrown off the train he had to make a decision whether to head back to India or stay and fight for the rights of Indians in South Africa. It was after witnessing the unfair treatment of Indians that…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Zinn Chapter 10 Summary

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages

    An incident sparked huge controversy in the Hudson River Valley , near Albany New York. It was the Anti Rent movement where tenants in New York decided to revolt against their patroon leaders which were landlords performing feudalism. The landlords were making laws and and doing what they pleases to the tenants and finally they became fed up and decided to take matters into their own hands. This shocked and caught landlords by surprise and had no Idea what to do. These landlords were high in society aristocratic men so when they were in trouble the government and local officials had no choice but to back them up. The police and government challenged the tenants made what the were doing illegal and imprisoned many of the movement’s leaders. The consensus was that they could not just use force to get what they wanted but needed to take a diplomatic approach, and that is exactly what they did.…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The next ingredient that made non-violence work was each leader accepting jail time. Gandhi spent about six and half years in jail but had no complaints about what would happen to him. In Doc.7 it states, “ I did not feel the slightest hesitation in entering the prisoner’s box.” As for Dr.King he was proud that he had come this far for his, but knew the fight wasn't over yet. In Doc.8 it states, “Those who had previously trembled before the law were now proud to be arrested for the cause of freedom.With this feeling of solidarity around me, I walked with firm steps towards the rear of the jail.” While, Mandela didn’t care what sentence he faced because he knew the people he would leave behind would finish his duties for him. In Doc.9 it states,…

    • 203 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During his train ride to a city called Pretoria, a white man denied his presence in the first-class section of the train, even though Gandhi had a ticket. Gandhi refused to move to the back of the train and was thrown off the train at the station. “He vowed that night to ‘try, if possible, to root out the disease and suffer hardships in the process,” (biography.com). From that point on, Gandhi would grow to be a powerful force for civil…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When in the face of an adversary, keeping a calm mind and a peaceful approach are key to finding a resolution. Our founding fathers, Jefferson and Washington, had the choice to end their disputes through violence or non-violence. They put every effort into non-violence until it no longer worked. It was only when all peaceful options were exhausted that they resorted to force as a last resort.…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Non-Violence Dbq

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mohandas Gandhi, Martin Luther King, Jr., and Nelson Mandela all achieved a revolution and independence in their countries through non-violence. The reason this worked is because the non-violent people would be beaten and killed for doing nothing wrong, this made the attackers look like idiots for killing defenseless people. This would make the attackers realize what they’re doing and they would grant the country independence. The documents provided could be situated into four categories: civil disobedience, self-control, willingness to accept punishment, and embracing the enemy.…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order for non-violence to work, people have to be non-violent. Each of these leaders were so powerful that they convinced even aggressive people to fight by not fighting. In Mandela’s case, he viewed nonresistance as the only way to bring democracy to everyone in South Africa because the government was many times more powerful than the movement (document 3). If Mandela had used violence, his people would have been hopelessly crushed and would remain oppressed. Martin Luther King persuaded all volunteers to give up all possible weapons before going to protest (document 5). He convinced the volunteers that all they needed to have was the ideology that they were right. Gandhi wrote a letter to Lord Irwin stating that if something is not done about the injustice of the British, he would lead a…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Do we live in a world where violent resistance is no longer a realistic option to oppose an oppressive regime? The Kenny reading showed that non-violence is a path that can lead to regime change. Why is that? Is it because a non-violent struggle is morally superior to a violent one, and is therefore difficult to oppose? After all, it’s difficult to justify violence against those who struggle without violence, for human rights, justice and democracy, things most people desire. To repress them would be a blatant violation of basic human decency, whereas in an armed struggle, repression can be justified, and implemented on a mass scale, in the name of stability. Perhaps a non-violent struggle is also superior to an armed one because of the question it poses? When a government faces a rebellion, its survival depends on its ability to out-kill the other side. But in a non-violent struggle, the government’s survival depends on its legitimacy in the eyes of the people. The struggle therefore becomes over votes, and rally sizes, both of which governments cannot win over easily when they are struggling against the numerically larger and more in-touch members of civil society. This could explain why governments often rely on crowd dispersal and repression, to combat non-violent activism.…

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Violent Revolutions are more Effective than Non-Violent Revolutions History is filled with examples of violent revolutions accomplishing what non-violent revolutions likely never would have accomplished. Whether it is the French Revolution from 1789 to 1799, the Nazi party’s goal for worldwide dominion, or the struggle in South Africa to shake off the chains of apartheid, violent revolutions have led to profound changes where non-violent civil disobedience probably would have failed. While proponents of non-violent revolutions often cite the likes of Martin Luther King and Mahatma Gandhi as examples of freedom fighters who chose brains over brawn, it can be argued that whatever success they may have achieved could have been accomplished more expediently had they been willing to meet their foes with force.…

    • 1681 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nelson Mandela and Mahatma Ghandi are both two revoutionaly men. Racism was and is a problem in todays and yesterdays culture. These men fought for equal rights of all men and women, no matter the color or origin. This paper will compare the two men not competitivly but as a "based on the facts" comparison.…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Meaning Of Non Violence

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The meaning of non violence would be the use of peaceful means, not force, to bring about political or social change. I would be very familiar with non violence because one of my friends that always get mad about any little thing and he would need to controlle his temper and not people and use his words. My friends name is kevin. He would always get upset when someone bumped into him by accident or if someone is telling him what to do he would just throw a big fit and try to hurt them. He didn’t do well at first from trying to achieve his goals so had some work to do. As the year went on he started to figure out in how to maintain his temper and he would get along with people and he started to get along with teacher and getting good grades.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gandhi Vs Fanon Essay

    • 1769 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Despite the fact that Fanon and Gandhi, in their pursuit of independence, have tried to rid the colonized people of feelings of inferiority and alienation, despair and inaction, Gandhi is drawn to the nonviolent resistance in South Africa and India, whereas Fanon shows his approbation of the resistance violence in Algeria and revolutionary violence in Iran. However, certain issues remain controversial in both realms: (1) whether violence is an innate feature in human nature, (2) the degree of the realistic effectiveness of violent and nonviolent resistance, and (3) the circumstances that can cause each approach to emerge.…

    • 1769 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is violence, the answer to people’s problems? NO WAY. Well first what does violence actually mean. Violence means ‘rough force that is used to injure or harm’ (Macquarie Pocket Dictionary Third Edition pg.1153). In The Outsiders by S.E. Hinton published in 1972 violence is used quite regularly to answer difficulties. In this novel there are two Gangs called The Socs and The Greaser. The Socs are the rich kids on the north side of town and The Greaser are the middle class kids on the south side of town. Violence is never the answer. It may lead to damage to your mental and physical health. It also hurts your friends and families.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This great land, the land of Buddha and Mahatma Gandhi, has proven to the world that ahimsa or ‘non violence is the sure way to peace. The entire world acknowledged the stubborn and adamant stance a certain diminutive man took which brought the great British empire to its knees. He retaliated to every act of violence with non-cooperation and achieved the impossible. Gandhi said ‘An eye for an eye would only make the whole world blind’ and the entire world awoke to this new mantra of the ‘half naked fakir’.…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Oppressed Peoples

    • 1187 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed.” Even in the time of the ancient Romans, violence has helped oppressed people become free from their royal bonds. An example of such oppression is the French Revolution, where the aristocrats and the king, Louis XVI mistreated their peasants, which lead to the poor revolting violently. On the other hand, some protests don’t use violent acts, such as Ghandi’s peaceful protests in India for independence from Britain. Although wars and other acts of violence have liberated oppressed peoples in the past, actions of non-violence have proved just as successful.…

    • 1187 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays