Preview

What were the problems facing Alexander the III in 1881

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1625 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What were the problems facing Alexander the III in 1881
The Problems facing Alexander III in 1881

When Alexander became Tsar, Russia was in crisis following the assassination of Alexander II. Supreme political authority was still in the hands of the Tsar, but there were immense challenges facing Alexander III as he suddenly became Tsar of the world’s largest country, covering a quarter of the world’s land surface. Although known as the ‘Russian’ Empire, it compromised a large number of ethnic groups, with the Russians making up only half the population. It was the Russians, however, who completely dominated the political and economic system.

Alexander III faced the problem of keeping this large multi ethnic empire together. At the same time, he needed to maintain his own supreme political power – which was difficult, because his father, Alexander II, had begun reforms which raised expectations of major change within Russia.

Russia was also one of Europe’s Great Powers; and Alexander III faced pressures from some of his advisors to reform his empire and to make it more like western and central Europe. This would involve reforming the autocracy, allowing an elective parliament to share political power with the Tsar. People who held these views were known as ‘Westerners’. Other advisors, known as Slavophiles, suggested that Russia develop along its own unique lines. They wanted the Empire to be autocratic and dominated by the Russians because, they believed, it was the authority of the Tsar that held this large and diverse Empire together.

How could Alexander III restore order, and set Russia on a course of political, social and economic stability?

Part of Alexander’s problem was the legacy left by his father. The assassination of the father horrified Russian society – and appalled his son. Throughout most of his adult life the future Alexander III had not been involved in political. However, he had made it known that he did not approve of his father’s modernising policies, and in 1881, when he became

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Another thing that had changed in Alexander III’s reign to make Russia seem unrecognisable in 1894 compared with 1881 was that the idea of reform was strongly opposed by him so Russia appeared to moving backwards instead of forwards in all aspects. Alexander III introduced a Manifesto that stated that the Tsar would be in charge of all political power. It presented a very conservative Russia where political and social stability was to be controlled and supported by autocracy, Russian nationalism and the Russian Orthodox Church. This shows how Russia had changed to become recognisable in 1894 because any idea of a constitution was rejected by the Tsar and represented Conservative ideas in his decision making. Russia…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapter 27 Review

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1: Russian society between 1815 and 1860 was full of reforms and a shifting government, all which led up to Alexander II who was responsible for many reforms.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All state leaders across the whole period held qualities that didn’t please the whole of the population in Russia. During the reign of Alex II, the government showed some strength with controlling opposition from the peasantry through the emancipation of the serfs in 1861. It was thought that to prevent revolt from below, this was a key movement that had to be made, and therefore prevented future unrest and opposition. However, the new liberated serfs had to deal with more laws concerning land ownership with led to further unrest and repression in the peasantry by the state. The state moreover, appeased the most vocal critics but in such a way that allowed dissenters to express themselves in the knowledge that Tsar’s decision would be final. Compared to Nicholas II’s reign, this showed a decisive leading technique, as Nicholas’s style was more conservative, and showed weakness, relying on others’ advice to fuel his decisions. A key failure throughout his period was the mixed rule attempt with the Duma introduced from 1906 to 1917, it is arguable that Nicholas II made concessions only to keep opposition temporarily at bay and that his aim was to uphold the principle of autocracy.…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The defeat in the Crimean war was arguably the main reason why Alexander II made a series of reforms when he came into power. The devastating loss of the war proved the backwardness of Russia in relation to other powers and even though peasant unrest and the criticisms of serfdom were partially responsible for influencing Alexander II, the decision to make changes primarily came from the loss of the Crimean war.…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With the assassination of his father, it threatened the whole political and social system in the Russian Empire, so Alexander III had a big challenge ahead of him to help try and keep the diverse country today. One of the first things he did was to replace all his fathers’ liberal ministers with Pobedonostev who instilled conservative values into Alexander III. Alexander III gave himself absolute power; they forced the schools to raise their fees to prevent the poorer classes from gaining an education this led to an illiteracy rate of 79%. Universities lost a…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Summary: Romanov Dynasty

    • 4116 Words
    • 17 Pages

    “The daily work of a monarch he found intolerably boring”-Kerensky. In a tsarist autocracy, all power and wealth is controlled and distributed by the tsar. The center of the tsarist autocracy was the person of the tsar himself, a sovereign with absolute authority. The rights of state power in their entire extent belonged to the tsar. Power was further entrusted by him to persons and institutions, acting in his name, by his orders, and within the limits laid down for them by law. The purpose of the system was to supposedly benefit the entire country of Russia. “Autocracy is a superannuated form of government that may suit the needs of a Central African tribe, but not those of the Russian people, who are increasingly assimilating the culture of the rest of the world. That is why it is impossible to maintain this form of government except by violence.” -Nicolai Tolstoy. Unlike western monarchies who were subjugated in religious matters to the Pope, the Tsar of the Russian Empire was the supreme authority on religious. Another key feature was related to patrimonialism. In Russia the tsar owned a much higher proportion of the state (lands, enterprises, etc.) than did Western monarchs. The tsarist autocracy had many supporters within Russia. “Be more autocratic than Peter the Great and sterner than Ivan the Terrible.” -Tsarina…

    • 4116 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The first thing that Alexander III did when he came into power to contradict his fathers reforms was to recall the decision of creating the constitution. Alexander III was a firm believer of the absolute power and judgment that autocracy and Russian history owned, he felt that Russia should stick to their traditional rules and the way things were run. Alexander put thins in to change this but Alexander III would not allow this and so reversed some of what he had done to make sure the Russian tradition stayed in place. He felt that a democratic Parliament was such a western way to think, NOT Russian. He preferred the principles of personal rule and he was so firm on this, he distrusted the bureaucracy. This lead to him wanting to be around conservative ministers such a Pobodenostev because he knew that if he was surrounded by the right people with the same mind has him, they too would want to reverse the reforms of Alexander II unlike the ones that he usually were with which was a mix of conservative and Liberal ministers that were influencing the changes in the first place.…

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Alexander III came into power earlier than he expected in 1881, he faced many problems that he needed to overcome. The reforms left by his father put his own supreme political power at risk and he had the problem of keeping the large multi-ethnic empire together. Also, he faced opposition from extremist groups such as the ‘People’s Will’ so he had the constant fear of being assassinated like his father was. He had three main beliefs to overcome these problems; repressing opponents, undoing the reforms of his father and restoring Russia’s position internationally and also restoring Russia’s national identity. Alexander III aimed to repress his opponents with the University Statute of 1887. He wanted to destroy the People’s Will and stop the spread of radical ideas and one of the ways he tried to do this was by severely restricting universities. Fees were increased to incredibly high prices meaning that only the very wealthy could afford to go there and the universities became government run so losing their self-government. Also, the Church controlled secondary schools so that no poor people could enter them and consequently not get into a university. This showed the short-sightedness of the Tsarist government as these changes led to rebellion. The statute did not destroy the People’s Will and in 1887 they made an attempt at assassination. The Okhrana killed the elder brother of future Bolshevik leader Alexander Ulyanov and this prompted him in 1918 to order the murder of Alexander III’s son Nicholas II and his entire family. Alexander III also needed to undo the reforms made by his father and he aimed to do this by introducing the Zemstva Act of 1890. Pobedonostsev began to undo many of the reforms…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unlike his father, the new tsar Alexander III believed that Russia could be saved from chaos only by…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Let us take a look back to find out about Alexander life structure and young man. He was the son of King Philip second of Macedon, as a young child, his father knew that he would be the future King. Alexander father was a well-educated man so he hired Lysimachus to teach his son to read and write. Furthermore, Leonidas of Epirus taught Alexander the skill of fighting to prepare him the future.(Joshua. J. Mark 2013). Consequently, Alexander was surrounded by great people his father trusted to help build up a significant structure for his son future.…

    • 97 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In spite of his obstination on playing Russian Autocrat, Alexander II acted for several years somewhat like a constitutional sovereign of the continental type. Soon after the conclusion of peace, important changes were made in legislation concerning industry and commerce, and the new freedom thus afforded produced a large number of limited liability companies. Plans were formed for building a great network of railways — partly for the purpose of developing the natural…

    • 1290 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Alexander II came into the throne in 1855 right in the middle of Crimean war, so he was unable to save the Russians from military defeat. However the war taught him a valuable lesson in the form of an idea. This idea was reform. Alexander II realized through the humiliation that was suffered that if he ever wanted to have stability, as well as peace at home and to be honored abroad then military and domestic reforms needed to…

    • 2900 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nicholas II came to the throne during an arduous time in Russian history. It was a combination of factors, including his political ineptitude that led to the fall of the Romanov dynasty and eventually cost Nicholas II, the Tsarina Alexandra and their five children their lives. Russia was late in modernising, partly due to the Tsar?s lack of reforms, and was behind Britain, France and the United States. Russia was also slow to emerge from feudalism, and was undergoing difficulty as industrial and agricultural production declined. Additionally, Russia was not socially advanced, as the peasants and working class had an extremely low standard of living, while the Royal Family lived a life of luxury. Politically, Russia was behind as there were no legal political parties, and the people had absolutely no power. The final event that pushed revolution to where it could not return from was World War I, which inflicted serious pain on Russia.…

    • 1455 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    russia revision guide

    • 7465 Words
    • 24 Pages

    How successful were Alexander II’s reforms in strengthening the Tsarist regime in the years 1855 to 1881? (24 marks)…

    • 7465 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1894, Nicholas II ascended to the throne following the death of his father, Alexander III. Woefully unprepared for such a role, Nicholas II has been characterized as a naive and incompetent leader. At a time of enormous social and political change in Russia, Nicholas held fast to the outdated, autocratic policies and opposed reform of any kind. His inept handling of the military matters and insensitivity to the needs of his people helped to fuel the 1914 Russian Revolution.…

    • 1212 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays