Many people believe that in the 1940’s most of India’s problems involving independence was to do with divisions within India rather than British imperialism. In this essay I will be looking at both points of view and finally giving my opinion. I will be using three sources also to help me show both sides of the story. I will also be using my further knowledge to add a wider range of knowledge.…
The outrageous division of Bengal by Viceroy Lord Curzon was incited such anti-British sentiment. The All-India Muslim League was formed as an advocate of the Muslim minority, and the political landscape of South Asia was forever changed, with Muslims and Hindus mixed up and pitted against each other. They sought, then, to be divided into more than one nation from the colony of India. The population resettlement question following the new independence of India became a huge dispute that cost thousands of lives and remains not totally solved. The colony ultimately became India and Pakistan, but there are still disputes over certain regions and small territories, some based on the population of each community and some of the traditional leadership.…
We find out much about British rule in India from the outbreak of fighting of the mutiny before 1857 as it tells us about how the East India Company forced strict rules and intervened upon the Hindu society such as ignoring their religious beliefs, which was one of the key factors leading up to the Indian ‘mutiny’. We see that although some changes did benefit from the Indians, the general attitude was negative, since all Indians were heavily taxed as discriminated. The way Britain changed from a trader to a ruler reveals to us how greedy Britain were at the time and how powerful as they could gain control of such a big country like India. We also can see how the British abused their power as they treated the Indians unfairly, as, in an account written by Vishnubhat Godse, an Indian who was living in the city of Jhansi in 1857, described how they British took…
The author’s experience of the Partition was a relatively good one as she come out of it unscathed as she mentions in her narrative “Because we are Harijans, whether it had become Pakistan or Hindustan it made no difference to us” (Butalia, 2000, p.270). As a child she looted the homes of those who had fled or were persecuted and as a result of the looting she…
When the British adopted India into their empire, India was ruled under the Queen. There were people sent to keep watch over the Indians. Since the British's conquering of India, Muslims and Hindus have been conflicting. Perhaps the reason for this is because overall, Hindus adapted to English education more readily than the Muslims; therefore being more "advanced" then the Muslims. Perhaps that caused conflicts to arise as intellect…
Before the First World War, there was little influence on the Indians desire for independence from the British. Analysing the three sources it can be indicated that the impact of the First World War was the main trigger placing these desires and strengthening them. However they tend to disagree to some extent and also are of different Nature, Origin and Purpose which can undermine their reliability.…
India has a history of being a fractured nation, at times this disunity was even able to save them from being taken over by conquerors like Alexander the Great. However, their luck was doomed to run out. India has always been a country rich in resources, making it natural prey to the British imperialists who not only wished to exploit these resources but the people of India as well. With a viewpoint such as this, it’s simple to see why Indian's view of British Imperialists evolved into yet another divided nation, with some coming to accept and see the benefits of Britain's political control, while others couldn’t come to terms with how easily the British system disregarded them and how altered it was from the once great Mughal Empire. Despite…
Struggled to make decision on Poland and eastern Europe, the “Pandora Box of infinite troubles”…
The partition of India in August 1947 was a highly controversial event and has led to widespread speculation regarding its causes and consequences. Orthodox historians credit the creation of Pakistan to Muhammad Ali Jinnah, the leader of the All India Muslim League, and his determination to create a sovereign state for Indian Muslims. However, this view has been contested by a number of historians, who place responsibility for the partition on the political manoeuvring of the Congress and the constitutional reforms of the British Raj. Existing communal tensions and Hindu-Muslim differences have also been blamed for the split. Revisionist historians question whether Jinnah even wanted partition and have suggested that the 'Pakistan' demand was simply a bargaining counter to gain recognition for Muslims. I am going to analyse each interpretation of the event and question the true causes for partition.…
One inevitable impact the division had on the people was perhaps one of the greatest refugee crises and migration in history. Over 10 million people moved between India and Pakistan. For the most part, the Hindus generally moved into the Indian subcontinent while the Muslims, who feared Hindu domination, migrated to East and West Pakistan. In Document 8 it shows that there were around 8.6 million Muslim refugees that migrated out of India into either East or West Pakistan. In addition to this extraordinary refugee crises, another effect the division of India had was border tensions. The tensions between the borders of India and Pakistan resulted in India being at the “receiving end of Pakistan’s heavy shelling” and “heavy bombing” (Document 9b). This shows that not only was there a large scale migration crises, there was also several attacks and possibly deaths and casualties from bombs. Also, in document 9a it that states that another effect of the division was that there were “two armed conflicts (in 1965 and 1999) and numerous clashes between Indian and Pakistani forces”. This highlights the various facets of the tensions and problems the division of India had on the Hindus and Muslims. It is inevitable that the division of the region greatly affected the people who lived there by causing the largest migration in human history, armed conflicts, and…
India, specifically, had an internal conflict between two religions, Islam and Hinduism. This was first noticed at the beginning of the twentieth century when India’s All-India Muslim League was created as an opposition to the Indian National Congress. A majority of the Muslims lived by the Eastern and North Western parts of the nation. The Hindus primarily lived in the center and Eastern sides of the country. The areas which had a majority of Muslims separated from the rest of India, which contained primarily Hindus.…
During World War Two, the British had mobilised India's resources for their imperial war effort. They crushed the attempt of Mahatma Gandhi and the Indian National Congress to force them to 'quit India' in 1942.…
The Muslim wanted to regain control and again set up the Mughal Empire. There was no general plan or a Leader. The princes did not want the Imperial power once again. There was no sense of patriotism and India was too dived for such a feeling. The only uniting force was Islam but the other groups opposed them which were Hindus and Sikhs as they did not want the rule of Muslim once again on the India. These were the reasons as British considered this as “Muslim Revolt”.…
The months leading up to the partition of India in 1947, saw heavy conflict in the Punjab between Sikh and Muslims, which saw the effective religious migration of Punjabi Sikhs and Hindus from West Punjab which mirrored a similar religious migration of…