Preview

When Is Civil Disobedience Justified?

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2027 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
When Is Civil Disobedience Justified?
Mahatma Gandhi says, “Civil disobedience becomes a sacred duty when the state becomes lawless and corrupt.” Gandhi was an Indian nationalist leader that against British-rule in Indian and also led India to independence; in addition, he inspired movements for civil rights and freedom across the world. There was a question that everyone has been asking from wartime to recently: when is civil disobedience justified? There are a lot of civil disobedience movements around the world; everyone is willing to against his or her government; they are fighting for freedom and equal rights. In David and Goliath by Malcolm Gladwell, he expresses his opinion about “The Limits of Power” through section three in his book. Gladwell gives us many examples to …show more content…
They believe a country needs to have a King, and the King has to set up the rule for everyone to follow; The government also believes that they can protect a country by setting up their rules; moreover, they don’t care if the rule will please everyone in their country. The fact that makes them believe this way because they have the absolute power and they will never look down to the people have no power. Especially in the communist country, the citizens have no power at all; they don’t have right to show their opinion that involves law and government business. This leads them to step up and makes civil rights movements. My oppositions think that if they want to control everything and everyone, they have to show their power to the civilians. Another reason that they are in a higher position than everyone else; they will do anything to make their citizen follow their rule even by violence; They want everything to work in their patterns. The president of communist countries will argue back to my opinion that a property country doesn’t have civil disobedience movements; there is no justification under any circumstances. The opposition wants everyone has to obey following their rule no matter what. Law enforcement will argue back that the law creates to protect the citizen rights, if everyone breaks the rule or disobey to follow the rule, the country will be chaotic. However, we don’t know if the law is right to protect citizen or just set up to harm their civilians; we don’t know that if everything the president and the government do is the right thing; and if we don’t have our opportunities to show opinions and voice, then who will make changes in an unjust country; likewise, the people in a high position never look down; this is limiting their views about their civilians; they don’t have any expectation about what is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Gladwell

    • 1781 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The aims of this essay is to evaluate whether Gladwell’s argument are true, and how reliable are the evidence used to support his arguments. I will critically evaluate, and identify the type of evidence used by the author, which sometime tend to be unconvincing.…

    • 1781 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry David Thoreau was arrested for his refusal to pay a state tax in support of the Mexican-American War. He was opposed to the war because it was intended to expand the slave states. Thoreau not only engaged in civil disobedience, but in his essay “Civil Disobedience”…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should we obey the law? Following the rules is something that is often emphasized from a very young age. However, there are cases when choosing to break the rules is the right thing to do. It is sometimes necessary to disobey the law.…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When did civil disobedience ever require moral responsibility? Civil disobedience is when people peacefully disobey the law. Now since when that was ever a moral responsibility. Moral responsibility is standards the we have to keep. Civil disobedience should not have to be a moral responsibility.…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Doing an injustice to the other people in order to obey the law is meaningless. It is better to break the law rather than following such inferior law. Civil disobedience can be justified if the disobedience is for the right matter. Civil disobedience is needed to bring the change in the government. It is justifiable if it does well to most of the people.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil disobedience is the active, professed refusal to obey certain laws, demands, and commands of a government, or of an occupying international power Civil disobedience is a symbolic or ritualistic violation of the law, rather than a rejection of the system as a whole. Non - violent resistance is the practice of achieving goals such as social change through symbolic protests. This a really interesting discussion due to the fact that it has so many layers which could change the way you think about the initial question entirely. For instance since the nation is free it would be reasonable that breaking the law would be a way to exorcise your freedom, laws are usually set to either prevent controversy or conflict. For the sake of the argument…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Newton's first law states that an object at rest will stay at rest while an object in motion will stay in motion unless acted upon by a force. The last part of that is crucial; only by applying a force will the motion of an object change. In a similar vein, it is through disobedience and rebellion that social progress can be made. The earliest example of American disobedience is the Stamp Act Congress.…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil disobedience is a vital and necessary part of life in a democratic system of government. It serves to keep the government from overstepping its bounds. There are times in the history of countries where the governing body has become complacent and has begun to violate the rights of their citizens. Civil disobedience is an effective way of discouraging and preventing such transgressions. Without the threat of dissidence from the public, there is nothing to keep governments honest except for the honor of those governments, which is highly questionable even in the noblest of nations. The role of elected officials in the United States is to represent their constituents, be they from their district, state, or party. If there is nothing to hold these politicians to this purpose, can we truly be sure they are ruling in a representative way and not in self interest?…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    "Civil disobedience can be justified because law is there to serve justice based on truth.", according to debatewise.com. Civil disobedience is justified according to them because most of the time people don't use peaceful resistance for something that helps the community. Most of the time people protest against things that will negatively affect their lives or other peoples lives. An example of what people may protest is racism by standing in the middle of the road and not letting people pass them and going on…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    People think that if they truly trust someone they can obey them without any doubt. This is correct and wrong at the same time, but however; people need to know what the orders are or tasks that they are obeying because you never really know someone until they show their true colors. WWII all started because people trusted Hitler and believed what he said and wanted was always right. He made people believe that Jews were evil, Jews were the cause of every single bad thing, and by twisting peoples’ mind he murdered 6 million Jews. There will continue to be people who are gullible enough to follow anyone and believe what they are doing is right.…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The resolution I have been researching for the past month is “Resolved: Civil Disobedience in a Democracy is morally justified.” Although there is no single, agreed upon definition, many definitions are similar. Civil disobedience is usually defined along the lines of refusing to obey certain rules and laws as a form of non-violent protest of an unjust law, or any law that one opposes, and is often done to bring attention to said law. Through my research, I have found a number of arguments for civil disobedience within a democracy, as well as arguments against it.…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the founding of the United States, the founding fathers feared a government that would become too authoritarian. To contrast this, they allowed the right to protest in the First Amendment. However, protesting usually does not do enough. Often, civil disobedience is necessary to provoke conversation about sometimes immoral societal norms. Many examples include Edward Snowden, Chelsea Manning, Rosa Parks, and others.…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We the people. Three courageous words that set the newly American people on a mission. A mission for life, a mission for liberty, and a mission for happiness. But those noble ideals embodied in the Declaration of Independence, Constitution, and Bill of Rights are still far from being achieved, and the mission continues to this day. Freedom for America didn't free the slaves, give women the right to vote, or end religious prejudice. There is nothing about a law that makes it inherently just, and the US is no exception. As a result of this, citizens may at times come to the conclusion that certain laws are in need of changing. The intention of the documents that set up our democracy was to ensure the government would forever be by and for the people. Sometimes legal means for ensuring America stays true to its original purpose prove inadequate. If such is the case in the instance at hand, turning to civil disobedience can have a positive impact on a free society.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil disobedience will always positively impact a society that calls itself free, because a free society must allow for dissent. Peaceful resistance to law creates dialogue between people on both sides of the issue.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To be clear though, civil disobedience never undermines just laws; furthermore, a person committing civil disobedience more than likely wishes nothing more than for these just laws to be upheld. The law that civil disobedience does however intend undermine, is unjust law, but as said by St. Augustine, “an unjust law is no law at all”; so, if one finds that statement agreeable technically civil disobedience does not undermine law at all . Now this begs the question, “How does one identify the line between a just law and an unjust law?” The answer to this question lies in the morals and feelings of a group of individuals. If a part of free country's population feels that a law directly goes against their morals, violates their rights, victimizes them or oppresses them in some way, such as the legal persecution of the Jews in the Holocaust, it is an inherent right of that group to counter that law with resistance, and a government should hope that resistance is peaceful, just ask Louis XVI about the result of the alternative.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays