Preview

whistleblowing

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1392 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
whistleblowing
Whistle blowing
"Whistle blowing" is a verbal and/or written communication, to a Person, Organization, or Activity, which is in the Public Sector (Government - local, state, or federal) or private Sector (Business/Industry/Non-government),the purpose of such communication being to expose and/or inform upon, alleged wrongdoing (fraud, theft, etc.), or discrimination (race, religion, national origin, gender, etc.), or retaliation, or some other type adverse occurrence that violates a law, or a regulation, or a policy, or morals, or ethics, or decency, and especially those matters that endanger public health and/or public safety.
A whistleblower is an employee, former employee, or member of an organization, especially a business or government agency, who reports misconduct to people or entities that have the power and presumed willingness to take corrective action. Generally the misconduct is a violation of law, rule, regulation, and/or a direct threat to public interest, such as fraud, health/safety violations, and corruption.

An employee who publicly alleges wrongdoing at his or her company or who reports this information to appropriate government agencies is a whistle blower.

Whistle blowing has to do with ethics because it represents a person’s understanding, at a deep level, that an action his or her organization is taking is harmful—that it interferes with people’s rights or is unfair or detracts from the common good. Whistle blowing also calls upon the virtues, especially courage, as standing up for principles can be a punishing experience. Even though laws are supposed to protect whistle blowers from retaliation, people who feel threatened by the revelations can ostracize the whistle blower, marginalizing or even forcing him or her out of public office. On the other hand, there have been occasions when the role of whistle blower has actually catapulted people into higher office and has earned the respect of constituents

When a person encounters

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    According to DeGeorge, for whistle-blowing to be considered ethical there first must be a serious harm that the whistle-blowing aims to prevent, which is greater than the harm it causes the firm and stakeholders. In this case, the corrupt activities are very serious and would have posed a greater harm going undetected than the negative media attention and charges brought against the firm. DeGeorge’s second condition states that the whistle-blower is required to first attempt to prevent…

    • 1698 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tim Barnett, Assistant Professor of Management at Louisiana Tech University, wrote an article expressing why he thinks companies should adopt a whistleblowing policy. Whistleblowers are individuals that call attention to possible wrongdoing and are exposed to a great deal of controversy. Some believe whistleblowers sacrifice themselves, professionally and personally to reveal practices that are fraudulent or harmful to the public. Others believe they are just disgruntled employees who are accusing people that have mistreated them. The truth probably lies somewhere between the two opinions. In some ways it is beneficial to have whistleblowers out there because they…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chap 21 outline law

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages

    F. Whistleblowing-occurs when an employee tells government authorities, upper-level managers, or the media that her or his employer is engaged in some unsafe or illegal activity.…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Doing what’s right is never an easy decision one when it comes to work. However, when it comes to whistleblowing, this may be the hardest choice that someone will ever have to make in their life. Handling a whistleblower claim means dealing with the possibility that repercussions may come in the terms of unemployment, drop of income, loss of friendships, and reputation. The choice of a whistleblower can be impossible to make, in terms, of how they are going to bring to higher authorities.…

    • 84 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Week 1 Quiz

    • 613 Words
    • 6 Pages

    3. A worker being fired for actions ranging from filing a workers’ compensation claim to reporting safety violations to government agencies is called…

    • 613 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When faced with a difficult situation of morals, choice, and possible destruction of a person’s protection and survival, individuals find themselves in a formidable situation. This is a common occurrence for people who become known as a whistleblower. There is a problem in the United States with protection of individuals for whistleblowing in the workplace, and not enough is being done for these individuals. Whistleblowing is increasing and has become more common, more frequent, and sometimes dangerous. Individuals could potentially face the inability of obtaining another job because they are stigmatized as a whistleblower. This paper will focus on two questions: How does the society’s view support whether someone will blow the…

    • 1797 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mike Rich

    • 2507 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The whistleblower poses no single entity, whether it being a single person or a business as a whole, to count itself immune to the dangers of corruption or malfeasance. Those who blow the whistle can neither risk the silencing of themselves for reasons of concrete evidence that question the proper moral and ethical interests of the public eye. According to Sissela Bok, “’Whistleblowing’ is a new label generated by our increased awareness of ethical conflicts encountered at work. Whistleblowers sound an alarm from within the very organization in which they work, aiming to spotlight neglect or abuses that threaten the public interest.” Take Frank Serpico, for example, a man whom was willing to risk his life, yet alone his career, to sound the alarm on the corruption within the very organization for which he worked for, the New York Police Department. Here in my discussion, we will examine and discuss Serpico’s case in correlation to the points made by Sissela Bok’s discussion on whistleblowing.…

    • 2507 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Silkwood

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages

    While there are many rewards to whistle blowing, there are also many risks to whistle blowing as well. One of the rewards of whistle blowing is that the laws or acts being violated will be corrected by the correct regulation agencies. Whistleblowers are even able to submit a confidential report online through National Whistleblowers Center website where attorneys review the information and give advice on the best ways to proceed with the investigation. There are also information and additional resources available for those who are thinking about blowing the whistle on their company. A risk of whistleblowing on the company can lead to alienation between the whistleblower and their…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    CU235P

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Whistle blowing policy in my workplace makes it clear to me and to staff that it is staff’s responsibility to report improper…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Paradox Of Missing Harm

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The three paradoxes that Davis claims the standard theory give rise to are the paradox of burden, the paradox of missing harm, and the paradox of failure. According to Davis, the paradox of burden perceives the whistle-blower as a good Samaritans because they take on substantial risk in their career, financial securities, and personal relation. The standard theory does not provide sufficient condition to justify such risk. Second, the paradox of missing harm argues that the whistleblower is reported damage after the fact, and they often act in the condition that they can prevent harm. Finally, the paradox of failure indicates that the whistleblowers have little success in preventing damage.…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Hutson (2014), “It is generally accepted that there are two types of whistle-blowing: internal and external. Internal whistle-blowing typically involves reporting concerns up the chain of command within the organization in the hope that whatever the problem is, it will be resolved. External whistle-blowing involves reporting concerns outside the organization and in particular, the media” (p. 251).…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Employment at Will

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Whistle-blowing is an example of a public policy exception to the employment-at-will doctrine. The term refers to an instance of reporting by an employee of an employer’s violation of the law or wrongdoing. A majority of states have established laws that offer some form of protection for whistle-blowers. One congressional act, the Whistleblowers Protection Act, and one statute, the Federal Whistleblower Statute, have also expanded protection for…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social Care

    • 2184 Words
    • 9 Pages

    5. The Whistle blowing policy can be used for your protection in the event you witness or experience discrimination or bullying at work.…

    • 2184 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whistle Blowing

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989, Pub.L. 101-12 as amended, is a United States federal law that protects federal whistleblowers who work for the government and report agency misconduct. A federal agency violates the Whistleblower Protection Act if agency authorities take (or threaten to take) retaliatory personnel action against any employee or applicant because of disclosure of information by that employee or applicant.…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Government whistleblowers are very disputed in society, with many people believing that they should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law, while others praise their efforts for reform. Whistleblowers are people that expose illegalities and corruption in government because they believe that it is better for the public to know for their own well-being. Oftentimes whistleblowers are charged under the Espionage Act for exposing measures of national security, although the determination of what is and is not considered national security information is a very precariously drawn line. Government secrets decided to be national security are officially supposed to be information that must be kept a secret to protect the nation; they are something…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics