Preview

Who Is Oliver Cromwell Deserving Of The Term Lord Protector?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
578 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Who Is Oliver Cromwell Deserving Of The Term Lord Protector?
What characteristic would be connected with the term “Lord Protector”? One would tend to agree it’s the use of their power for the country’s interests. But what about Charles I? He ruled without the Parliament for 11 years. He lacked the common touch, he caused a rebellion in his own country. In the other hand Oliver Cromwell who was the leader of the new model army, fought to make sure that Parliament had a fair share of the interest of the country. Thus, I believe that Oliver Cromwell is deserving of the term “Lord Protector” because of his actions of the greater good, and how his modest character and religious views shaped the country for the better.
Many imperfections can be hidden in the spotlight of a leader, but one thing that could
…show more content…
As he wrote letters about his successful battles, he would not take full credit of it. He would sincerely give credit to god first, and then his foot soldiers. In the letters he has written he would frequently apply the word “we” or in th other words. He would not selfishly use the words “I” in his sentences. He took pride in his battles with his soldiers. He also took his pride in religion. Cromwell was puritan he devoted to the belief that if you worked hard, you would go to heaven. Although He stricted many traditions that resolved around pointless enjoyment, he himself wasn’t that strict. He enjoyed music, hunting and playing bowls. He even allowed a full scale wedding party for his daughter's wedding. Despite of his opinion of religious order, his hatred for the Irish was an deniable. Under the interest of the state and his religion he believed that the Irish were potential to help any willing Catholic countries to attack England. You might not understand his savagery for the irish, but keep in mind He allowed the Jews, Catholics, and Protestants to worship within the state. His aim was for broad religious toleration, which brought him more favor from people and economic boost from the acceptance of Jews and other religions back into the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Factors That Drive Change

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Leaders notice the most obvious barriers such as cost, quality and time which he describes as only the tip of the iceberg. However he believes that the barriers underneath are more powerful and hidden that capabilities, values, attitudes and emotions. He believes that by considering these too the leader will be able to implement the change better, neglecting these will convert them into…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bmgt365 FinalProject

    • 2673 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Styer, S. (2012). The Biggest Mistake A Leader Can Make. Forbes. Retrieved on December 9th, 2014…

    • 2673 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    At this point the actions of Cromwell were all in his own interest- he was a supporter of the Self-denying Ordinance since he was an exception, and he already met the requirements to…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According to Richard Hakluyt expanding to the the East and West Indies would help stabilize England and even help it flourish. Hakluyt addresses that their are “thousands of idle persons” within the realm and could be made useful and condemned in the Newfoundland. He continues to list a number of useful things that they could do like: making tar, pitch, soap ashes, mining for gold, copper, and etc. By stocking these useful products Hakluyt explains that they could prosper and make them into good merchandise for other countries.…

    • 88 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Coming from lower class beginnings it is no surprise that more information about his formative years was not documented. He was born in the year 1485 to a cloth-worker and alehouse keeper in the small village of Putney; just outside of London. Information regarding the years after his birth does not appear again until he decides to travel Europe as a teenager. The reasoning behind his sudden want to travel is not known, but it was most likely that his ambitions no longer fit in with the rural life he led it Putney. Cromwell’s travels as a teen led him through the Netherlands and then eventually to Italy. First battling in Garigliano in 1503 as a soldier, and then working in the Venetian banking house of Frescobaldi. By the year 1514, he had once again made the journey from Rome, back through the Netherlands, and to London. There, he married a widow and lived a quiet life while working in his law practice. A few years later though, he assists the town of Boston in their quest to secure “a bull of indulgence from Pope Leo X.” (historyofparliament.com) These events were only the beginning of Thomas Cromwell’s ambitious nature. Later, in the year 1520, Cromwell earned himself one of the most coveted and feared positions in the kingdom—working under Cardinal Thomas…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the devastating fall of Cardinal Thomas Wolsey, to the rise of his successor, the relentless Thomas Cromwell. Cromwell, throughout the course of English history has continually been portrayed as the main villain during Henry VIII’s reign, aside from Henry himself of course. A man, who thought nothing of betraying friends or allies in his conquest to secure the most notorious career in history. Since Henry VIII sent his chief minister and close advisor to the scaffold five centuries ago on 28 July 1540, historians have debated on the characterisation of Cromwell. Was he a manipulative death merchant who, throughout his political career killed and victimised thousands of innocent people for obeying their religious beliefs. Or was Cromwell simply a man of modest decent, risen from the ashes of his poor upbringing, due to his impeccable intelligence and determination?…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry VI and the Nobility

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The power of the Nobility was the most important cause of unrest in the period of 1450 to 1470. ‘How far…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    yo check it

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Source E is source from a revisionist Historian who will have looked into a variety of sources regarding Thomas Cromwell’s demise prior to coming to an overall conclusion. When looking at providence of the source it is an impartial source as the writer does not have a motive, although like hay source it will have been opinion based. Throughout Cromwell’s career, he had made several reforms which were supported by the protestant radicals within parliament and at court, yet the conservatives strongly opposed Cromwell and a majority of the powerful noble house in England were very conservative in their views. Through reforms such as the dissolution of monasteries and continuation of the break from Rome, and his blatant advances towards a more protestant church in England he gained himself some very powerful enemies such as Thomas Howard who was a leading conservative leader and even introduced his niece to court to seduce Henrys mind and gain support against Cromwell within the court. Source E goes onto to say that Cromwell had already lost Henrys favour due to the collapse of the marriage to Anne of Cleves, ‘… might have survived if his enemies had not made good use of the collapse of the Cleves marriage’, the annulment of the Cleves marriage had put Norfolk in a very strong position through as I mentioned earlier the introduction of his niece, and his support at both…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    How far do sources 1, 2 and 3 support the argument that Henry VII was a good king?…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Shaw notes the unrecognized weaknesses or threats that has the potential to impaire the leader's success as blind spots. He highly suggestes that most of leadership failures are due to "black swan events" that are outside of the leader's control. wherase some failures are the result of situational blindness.…

    • 165 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, this is a view that historians seem to always use when an army massacres civilians. It seems more likely that this operation was conducted purposefully with the aim of furthering his cause on the island of Ireland. Cromwell in his letter to Sinnott was effectively stating that his army would be let loose in the town if there was no surrender. It could be argued, like Tom Reilly that the blame is on Sinnott; however, like the argument provided by Scott-Wheeler it does not suffice. Both are very simple arguments and take a huge proportion of the guilt away from Cromwell himself. The fact is, Cromwell was the Commander-in-chief of the New Model Army. It was up to him and him alone to keep control of his soldiers. If he was incapable of doing this, then he was in the wrong role to begin…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If not for this Charles would have simply chosen to dissolve parliament again when things stopped going his way, rather than starting the first civil war. The Members of Parliament knew this and so ensured in advance that parliament would be able to go through with its policies without the threat of Charles being able to stop it. It can therefore be assumed that parliament was willing to take measures to guarantee the political situation in England was amended. However Parliament was very much divided over how harshly they should oppose the king and his methods of ruling England, some individuals, such as Oliver Cromwell thought that since the parliamentary side was winning the vast majority of battles it must be the will of God that the King is fully defeated; another Member of parliament who strongly opposed the king John Pym, who was a leader on the Committee of Safety and organised parliament’s military strategy and negotiated the allegiance with Scotland, which he realised was a fundamental factor to remove King Charles I from power. These particular individuals were willing to go to any lengths to gain parliamentary control of England, including going to war however other MPs were more inclined to make peace with the…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fdr Characteristics

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages

    ory a president’s success or failure has been determined greatly on the basic character and leadership of the President. “Historians and political scientist have argued about how important a leader’s characteristics are for understanding and explaining events.” (Pika, Maltese, & Rudalevige, 2017) Most of America’s presidents have had many common characteristics, from coming from similar financial back grounds, some whose fathers whom served public offices, and education from ivy league colleges. With all these similar characteristics, what can one determine led to their success or ultimate failure? They have many different styles of leadership they have all held this position. However, leaderships styles can differ and still have positive…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For instance, like President Obama his leadership has the ability to influence others but something people cannot distinguish it because they…

    • 155 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    King Henry Viii Eassy

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages

    People recognize kings as their all powerful kind leader that would protect all their people from harm. Although, in reality there are kings who disliked are not looked up toward by their. For example, Henry VIII was a king that abused his own power to gain whatever he wanted through force and execution.…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays