Preview

Why A Minor Should Not Have The Right To Make Medical Decisions

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
777 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why A Minor Should Not Have The Right To Make Medical Decisions
I believe that minors should not have the right to make most medical decisions. The amount of factors that play into my choice, as to why minors shouldn’t have the right to make decisions, varies. Most minors do not think in their best interest, therefore the parent should have the right to make the medical decisions. The later effects of a treatment/surgery could be forgotten when a minor is making his/her own decisions, the parent would strongly consider the later effects. Parents or guardians are in more of a position to make these decisions with so much responsibility. The main questions that would be taken into consideration are: what decisions should we let a minor make? Why should those decisions be up to a minor and not any others? If a parent thinks these decisions could cost a minor his/her own life, should the mother/father make the decisions for them? Even with these questions at hand, our responsibility is to determine if we should even let …show more content…
Most minors making their own decisions would be thinking in their own current interest and not the long term benefits. As A. Rae Simpson stated, “According to recent findings, the human brain does not reach full maturity until at least the mid-20s.” 1 A minor cannot be fully competent enough to make serious medical decisions. These serious decisions can range from minor vaccinations to major life or death surgeries. For example, if a minor was left in charge of a routine vaccination, due to this minor not liking needle he/she would rebuff the request. This could put the minor’s health in danger. The average minor wouldn’t be able to make decisions, thinking only in the short term and not long-term health. A minor would be faced with a lot of responsibilities and wouldn’t be able to manage the stress of the decision, therefore more health issues. Thus, having a minor make health decisions would be causing them more problems than letting the parent make the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Roper Vs Simmons Case Study

    • 2284 Words
    • 10 Pages

    It was noted that while juveniles are capable of committing truly heinous crimes, they are not fully culpable for three main reasons. The first reason discussed was that juveniles under the age of eighteen lack the maturity and responsibility that adults have attained. This shortcoming causes decisions and subsequent actions to be poorly thought out. Basically, juveniles are not responsible decision makers. This idea was supported by the fact that most states do not allow minors to vote, do jury duty, or get married without consent. The second rationale for why juveniles are less culpable than adults dealt with environment. It was suggested that juveniles lack control over their environment. They do not have the ability to remove themselves from an environment that encourages delinquency. Finally, juveniles are less culpable because they are still developing a sense of self identity. This suggests that behaviors exhibited now may not be part of their character in five or ten years, allowing for recovery. The majority then argued that the same reasoning they used in Stanford v. Kentucky applied to Roper v. Simmons, and that the eighth amendment did not allow for the execution of people under age eighteen due to lesser culpability (Counsel of Record,…

    • 2284 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why is it important to have a parent or guardian present when treating minors, under 16 years of age?…

    • 5714 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The question at hand, “Legislated parent-child relationship vs. Open parent-child relationship?” The legislated parent-child relationship can be summarized as a biased approach for the child when it comes to their healthcare decisions. For instance, a teenager would have to have consent from their parents if they wanted to be treated for STIs, mental health counseling, pregnancy prevention and substance abuse. On the other hand, an open-parent-child relationship permits teenagers to seek treatment with or without the consent of their parents. Some teenagers are not comfortable talking to their parents about certain healthcare decisions therefore; it should not be required by law.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It is not right to hold children and adolescents who are underage to adult standards. Children do not have the rights or responsibilities that adults do. At that time in their lives, children’s brains are not fully developed so we recognize their inability to make decisions. Barbe Stamps makes a good point in her article on juvenile punishment when she states, “We don’t say, ‘This is a very important election,…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    keep them safe. Removing the right of parents to consent to this treatment could result in a tragic…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    considered competent may be able to provide informed consent on their own, these children are…

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    CYPW Unit 54

    • 465 Words
    • 3 Pages

    2.1 Examples of potential conflict or dilemmas between duty of care and a young person’s rights…

    • 465 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    -When a parent makes all decisions in a young child’s life without explaining the reasons why behind the decision, the child gets the impression that he/she has no control over their circumstances.…

    • 156 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mental Capacity Act Nvq 5

    • 6650 Words
    • 27 Pages

    1 All adults have the right to make decisions for themselves unless it can be shown that they are unable to make them. This means that people must not assume that someone cannot make decisions for themselves just because they have a particular medical condition or disability, or because they are of a particular age or appearance.…

    • 6650 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the United States’ history, the Supreme Court has decided many cases. Their job is to decide whether or not laws, or punishments given by lower courts, abide by the rules written in the United States Constitution. Their decisions are based upon precedents set by other court cases, or their opinions of what the Constitution means, if there is no precedent. On the topic of the rights of minors, the Supreme Court has justly protected these rights as shown in the cases of In Re Gault, Tinker v. Des Moines, and New Jersey v. T.L.O.…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ford and English offer clear, strong support that notifying parents of their adolescents health care needs can be very negative and impact whether or not the youth will seek health care for themselves. In…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The capacity to control impulses and determine the consequences of actions also occurs. Many teens start making decisions for themselves and learn how to regulate their emotions (Stanford's Children Health, 2017). As juveniles learn to self-regulate and become adults, they make poor choices and mistakes. Adults however have gone through this stage of development. They have developed the ability to control impulses and think logically (Siegel M.D., 2014).…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    beauty

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages

    One reason for requiring parental consent is concern about liability. Minors are not held to the same standard of liability for their actions as adults are, and may not understand the dangers or consequences of their actions and subsequently if a minor has any injury or damage, the parents may be held responsible. Because of this, the law under the Health and Safety Act governs before engaging in such activities, minors need the consent of their parents.…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Duty of Care

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Young people may have their individual rights and free agency, but we as carers also have a duty of care to ensure they are making the right choices. This puts us in a dilemma and poses a conflict between their rights and the duty of care we have for them. Some potential conflicts or dilemmas that may arise are unsafe behaviours such as alcohol abuse or drug use…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since state and local laws send mixed messages to young people, we don’t know what is the age of responsibility, it could be the age of 18, 21, or maybe 25. It’s important that we know this so tat maybe we can get state and local laws to change. So, they don’t send young people mixed messages. For the past 19th and 20th century it has been believed that 21 is the threshold age of responsibility but with all the limitations state and local laws have, sends mixed messages to young people about what is the age of responsibility.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays