Preview

Why Did Germany Was Responsible For The Treaty Of Versailles

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
763 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Did Germany Was Responsible For The Treaty Of Versailles
Germany was blamed for starting the world war one in 1914, and took a huge hit from the aftermath in 1918 having a total of almost 700 thousand casualties. Since germany was the main contributor of the start of this war, other countries turned their backs and forced the germans to pay for what they have done. Hence the activation of a treaty that took alot away from them. They were not allowed to build up their army, they had to lose land, and pay to france for the chaos that has been caused. The treaty was called the treaty of versailles which was signed in 1919. Germans of course were not happy about it as they lost a lot of land, they had to give up the rhineland, austria and poland. As the struggle continues, 1933 january 30th, a …show more content…
Chamberlain was afraid of war and was preventing it at any cost as he had his own problems.The economic turmoil that Chamberlain was facing, the decision of appeasement in the Munich agreement was the only choice, however it was the wrong move as the problems that this lead to over-weigh the problems they were having at that time.

What made Chamberlain sign the Munich agreement

Chamberlain’s britain was suffering from various economic/political problems which forced him to go soft on enforcing the treaty of versailles as he could not afford a war. The appeasement decided by mostly chamberlain with other leaders such as Mussolini and Daladier in the Munich agreement which allowed the Germans to send their troops to the Rhineland and gain some land back. Hitler’s excuse was that there were 5000 Germans living in the Rhineland. Chamberlain accepted hitler’s excuse as he was trying his best to prevent war. Not only chamberlain played a role in this agreement, but Mussolini the leader of italy, and Deladier the leader of france also agreed to the decision. These three leaders but mainly Chamberlain, were trying

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    German Aggression Dbq

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Within two years of consolidating power over Germany, Hitler and the Nazi Party had commenced operations to reverse the provisions of the Treaty of Versailles which had treated the German people in an unfair manner. Among these reversals included foreign diplomatic measures which would ensure that Germany would annex the territories it had lost at the conclusion of World War One. In September of 1938, with Europe on the brink of yet another major war, Great Britain’s Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain called the four powers – Germany, Italy, France, and Great Britain – to convene in Munich and address German aggression against Czechoslovakia and the Sudetenland. Among Neville Chamberlain’s goals for the conference was the notion to avoid…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    DBQ 19

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 1939 the world was plunged into World War II because of the Munich Agreement. The Munich Agreement was an agreement regarding the Sudetenland Crisis between the major powers of Europe after a conference held in Munich in Germany in 1938. The Sudetenland was an important region of Czechoslovakia. The Treaty of Versailles was the peace treaty created as a result of six months of negotiations at the Paris Peace Conference of 1919, which put an official end to World War I between the Allies and Central Powers. The Munich Agreement caused many disagreements between European countries. Collective security was a more effective response to aggression than appeasement because more European countries disagreed than agreed with the decision made during the Munich Conference for various reasons and Germany had many ways of keeping its territories under control.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    DBQ world war 2

    • 2303 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Prime Minister Chamberlain suggested the best way to deal with Hitler was a policy of appeasement.…

    • 2303 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Treaty of Versailles marked the end of World War I in 1919. Germany and their allies were blamed for WWI. Because Germany was blamed for sparking the war, they had their military restricted to 100,000 men, had to pay reparations, lost their Pacific and African colonies, and the Rhineland was turned into a demilitarized zone. In the 1920s, Adolf Hitler became the leader of the Nazi Party in Germany and began rising in power. He became the Fuhrer in 1934.…

    • 1462 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ralph Waldo Emerson once said, “Our greatest glory is not in never failing, but in rising up every time we fail.” This was Germany’s philosophy after losing the war. WWI began on July 28, 1914, with the assassination of the Archduke Franz Ferdinand by a secret group of people who originated from Serbia. Austria’s anger sparked World War I by declaring war on Serbia. This led to a chain reaction in which countries from all over Europe declared war on each, and resulted in the creation of two alliances. Even though WWI was supposed to end by an armistice signed between France and Germany, the war raged on due to poor communication. The war formally ended when a group known as the League of Nations created a document called the Treaty of Versailles in which Germany was not represented. This document was harsh to the Germans as it blamed the entire war on them and gave them a colossal, unmanageable debt under the war guilt clause. From a current standpoint, this was a very foolish thing to do, but the question is what parts of that Treaty led to the Germans to fight back? The Treaty of Versailles helped cause WWII because the Germans were unwilling to pay the debt, they felt very insecure, they wanted to regain lost territory, and most importantly wanted the restore glory for Germany.…

    • 1128 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Intimidation from Fascist leaders was a factor that led to the illogical events of World War II. Adolf Hitler, chancellor of Germany, justified his barbaric actions on his attempt to benefit the "superior" German race. The effects of his ambitions were displayed during the Munich Conference in 1938. Hitler invited the Prime Minister of Britain and the Premier of France and demanded that the Sudetenland become part of Germany. Due to France and Britain's fear of another war, Hitler's demand was accepted. The appeasement, or agreement in order to maintain peace, at the Munich Conference was said to have "saved Europe from a world war," as stated by William Shirer. Contrary to Shirer, Europe would still be involved in war and things would only get worse.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    WWII DBQ

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Followed by World War I, Germany had received many limitations from the Treaty of Versailles. The leaders at the Paris Peace Conference decided they wanted to get “revenge” on Germany, and decided to take everything they valued away. The Treaty of Versailles took Germany’s army, and their air force. It also made them pay everyone who was involved in World War I’s war debt. This enraged Germany, but would later feed them the fuel they needed to rebuild the country.…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    World War II DBQ

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages

    One of them being that Germany was frustrated over the Treaty of Versailles. Germany was upset that they had to follow unfair demands, including paying for all of the damages of World War I, lessening their armies, and limiting their military. In time, an aggressive ruler in Germany came to power named Adolf Hitler. Hitler felt that the outcome of the Treaty of Versailles was unfair, so he did the opposite of what the treaty stated and put all the money into building a stronger military. As time went on, Germany wanted to reunite their brother land (doc 1). Since other powerful countries feared the power of Hitler and his army, they gave into him, following the policy of appeasement. They agreed to the terms in which the “Big Four” gave Czechoslovakia over to Germany in order to resist war (doc 4). Hitler believed it was their right to the land because Germany owned it, post-World War I. In addition, at the start of World War II, most nations were in a worldwide depression. This state of depression, made it easier for aggressive and charismatic rulers to take control over weak nations. The people hoped the powerful rulers would help to fix and change the economy. Many of the great powers thought it was a good idea to give into appeasement. On the other hand, many disagreed and argued that by giving into one demand today would cause the nation to weaken “tomorrow” (doc…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Munich agreement encouraged Hitler to take more land and spread militarism. Neville Chamberlain should have stopped Hitler in his tracks, and gathered Allies to defend Poland, as well…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Obama VS Chamberlain

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages

    When Chamberlain went to Munich on September 29th, 1938, to ask Hitler to discontinue, as he would have said, his plans to take over Poland, Chamberlain had good intention, but bad execution. He claimed that the appeasement was for, "The peace of our time," and that his agreement with Hitler, that which Hitler publically disregarded 7 days later, would allow Europe to continue war-free, sparing it from the trauma and anxiety associated with war. It is well known that Chamberlain failed utterly to accomplish anything with the appeasement, and war did in fact break out the following year. Recently, President Obama went to Geneva to negotiate peace terms with Iran regarding them physically possessing nuclear weapons, and failed to accomplish anything. In fact, Iran slapped America in the face by completely undermining America's request, and this is the cause for much controversy and ill feelings toward Obama as of late.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Appeasement was the right policy for England in 1938. This is because It was based on the idea that what Hitler wanted was reasonable and, when his reasonable demands had been satisfied, he would stop. Appeasement was the only practical action that could be held during that time. England and France were not ready to get into another war. They already had severe damages that they couldn’t afford to get into another war. This gave them time to prepare for war since it is inevitable anyways. It also gave them time to prepare for old and broken equipment. Alliances needed to be made and through this, that was all possible. Also, through this policy, they were able to get public support. Appeasement also allowed Britain time to retool factories for war. Many Britons during that time saw Hitler as a defence against Russian Communism. This all happened because they thought that Hitler would soon be satisfied after remilitarizing the Rhineland, annexation of Austria and czechoslovakia. Wanted to please Hitler this way. The empire was already overstretched and its financial resources quite limited. The U.S. was isolationist. Soviet communism was feared, France was weak. This was all done to prevent war and preventing war is something needed to be done. Their objective was for the collaboration of all nations in building up a lasting peace for Europe. The Czechs, left themselves and told they were going to get no help from the Western Powers, would have been able to make better terms than they have got. This also gave the greatest chance of securing protection for the country. Czechoslovak State would’ve not been able to be an independent entity without this. Chamberlain remembered the slaughter of the…

    • 2172 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chamberlain suggested appeasement in hopes of keeping peace and avoiding war. He wanted to avoid war for as long as possible and keep the Europe out of war unless a bigger reason arose.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cause Of Ww2 Essay

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Some of the causes of ww2 is Italian fascism in 1920 Japanese militarism and invasions of china in 1930 and especially the political takeover in 1933 of Germany by Hitler and its aggressive foreign policy. On 6 October Hitler made a public peace overture to the United Kingdom and France, but said that the future of Poland was to be determined exclusively by Germany and the Soviet Union. Chamberlain rejected this on 12 October, saying "Past experience has shown that no reliance can be placed upon the promises of the present German…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Neville Chamberlain and Adolf Hitler shook hands at the Munich Conference in 1938. This resulted in the pact, signed Sept. 29th, which recognized the German annexation of the Sudetenland in Czechoslovakia in return for a promise that there would be no further aggression. This policy of appeasement failed to prevent the outbreak of World War II.…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hitler Essay

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages

    a) Neville Chamberlain was the British Prime Minister during the 1930’s and was known as an “appeaser” in regards to Hitler’s foreign policy. In September 1938, during the Czechoslovakian crisis, the appeasers appeased to Hitler’s taking of the Sudetenland due to the threat of war. On October first 1938 in the Daily Herald Newspaper, the headline stated that Mr. Chamberlain declared that “It is peace for our time”. Some people say that the appeasers, such as Neville Chamberlain, were the indirect cause of World War two.…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays