Why Did The Hawaii King Was Abolished

The anti-overthrow party made a strong case, saying that Hawaii was annexed without the consent of people with Hawaiian blood. Therefore, the annexation of Hawaii was illegal because Hawaii was not a part of America, so the joint congressional resolution was not legal. On January 17, 1893, the Hawaiian monarchy was first overthrown because a group of businessmen and sugar planters forced Queen Liliuokalani to abdicate. When Kalakaua became king in 1874, his goal was sought to reduce the power of the white missionary party had, but that didn’t happen as King Kalakaua wanted. Instead, his protests against foreign power riled them, resulting in the idea of striking against Kalakaua. The overthrow was wrong and unfair because of people like John Stevens and the group Committee of Public Safety. The overthrow was not justified because of John Stevens, the Committee of Safety, and because the foreigners forced Queen Liliuokalani to abdicate (The Overthrow of the Hawaiian Monarchy). The overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom was illicit because of John Stevens. He was an associate justice of the supreme court of
Stevens had an impact on the overthrow of the Hawaii Kingdom by landing American troops onto the Hawaii island, resulting in conflicts with the Hawaiians. Accordingly, due to Stevens guidance and aid, this resulted in having the Committee of Safety schedule a mass public meeting on January 16 to denounce the Queen and garner support to carry through with their plans. Minister Stevens decided to land American troops that same day, and when the Queen's ministers expressed their protest to him, Stevens told them to put any objections in writing. Many people say that the overthrow was justified because the Hawaiian kingdom was not taken by coercion, but all the Hawaiians had sold their land to them and no one was dispatched or wounded in the