Preview

Why Do We Decided To Oppose The Federalists

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
491 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Do We Decided To Oppose The Federalists
So, we decided to oppose the federalists with our own party and kind of government.

Interview with Thomas Jefferson

Interviewer: Why did you form the democratic republican party?
Jefferson: We were just starting out as an independent country, and we were struggling to figure out what we wanted it to be. When the Federalists proposed their type of government, we didn’t agree with them. Interviewer: How did the Federalists want to form the government, and what about it did you not like?
Jefferson: Well, the federalists wanted a strong centralized federal government, but James Madison and I thought that having a strong centralized government would weaken the people’s and the states’ rights. So, we decided to oppose the federalists
…show more content…
That way the people and the states’ would still have rights.

Interviewer: So, I’m pretty sure that the kind of government wasn’t the only thing you argued about am I correct?
Jefferson: We argued about many things, some of the things include Jay’s treaty, the assumption of states’ debts, and where to put the capitol.

Interviewer: What was Jay’s treaty about?
Jefferson: Jay’s treaty was officially called The Treaty of Amity, Commerce, and Navigation. Amity was there because this treaty strengthened our bond with the british. Commerce because it allowed us to have some trading with the british colonies, and Navigation because it gave us a border between us and the Canadians.

Interviewer: Why did you argue about Jay’s treaty?
Jefferson: Well we argued about the Jay’s treaty because the Federalists wanted to favor England for the foreign policy because at that time they depended on Britain's business, and we wanted to favor France.

Interviewer: Why did you want to favor France?
Jefferson: Well after the recent revolution we felt that France was more democratic because they overthrew their

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Thomas Jefferson and his group of republicans had no patience with the federalists view that only the “best people” should rule. To Democratic-Republicans, this view came close to monarchy, or rule by a king. Democratic-Republicans believed that the best government was the one that governed the least. A small government with limited powers was most likely to leave the people alone to enjoy the blessings of liberty. To keep the national government small, they insisted on a strict construction, or interpretation, of the Constitution. Opposingly, Alexander Hamilton and his group of federalists believed that the country should be ruled but the best people, educated wealthy public spirited man like themselves. People that had the tims education and background to run the country wisely. Federalists favored a strong national government, they believed in loose construction, a government's powers under the constitution to unite of the states were not nealy as important as national power and unity. They wanted one powerful national government to run the entire…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With respect to the federal Constitution, the Democratic-Republicans were usually characterized as strict constructionists who were opposed to the broad constructionism of the Federalists. As history dictates, this is substantially accurate. In the time frame of 1801-1817, Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, the Republican presidents of the time, demonstrated the differences of the Republican Party in several aspects involving the interpretation of the Constitution. The Democratic-Republicans believed that the government should follow a strict interpretation of the Constitution and held the idea that this would allow honest representation of the people and prevent government corruption. However, the Federalists were firm believers in the production of a strong central government and a broad interpretation of the Constitution.…

    • 1140 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Jay picked up on the French duplicity- very suspicious about France’s motives. Urged the American delegates to come to agreement with Britain- that wasn’t supposed to happen!…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The opposing competitors such as the Jeffersonians led by Thomas Jefferson, who preferred rural life and spoke for southern efforts, believed that it would be more necessary to provide the majority of the power with the individual states. The Jeffersonians also believed that the creation of national banks was unconstitutional, and that it wasn’t permitted by our early forefathers. As differences continued to occur, Americans only saw the gap between the two political parties widening more and more.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our first president George Washington was a wise man and didn’t believe in political parties. He thought political parties would split apart the country and make government a competition instead of a place to serve the people. Although, inevitably the first political parties were made, the Federalists and Democratic-Republicans. The original political parties in America had very different views on many topics including their interpretation of the Constitution.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The federalists view saw the republicans view as a weakness. They insisted on a stronger common government. The federalists had an understanding that there could only be one sovereign in a political system, one final authority that everyone must obey and no one can appeal. They thought this was the only effective way in creating an effective central government. The independent states seemed to think it was clear that each one of them were independently sovereign, although based on history only small countries were suitable for the republican government. With history proving the republicans wrong for trying to create a republican government in the states the federalists were slowly trying to create a stronger central government. There first step was making the sovereign states agree to the Articles of Confederation which established a close alliance of independent states. The federalist central government was referred to as a "confederacy". The last phrase of the articles represented the states acting together instead of a government…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Though both the Anti-Federalist and Federalist Constitution makers were aristocratic and wanted a government removed from the masses, their political philosophies differed greatly. Jefferson’s thinking was very progressive for his time in…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Federalists were in favor of a strong central government, they took actions which demonstrated the authority of the federal government. Actions like John Adams, while in office had signed the sedition acts of 1798. The sedition act prohibited anyone from opposing the government. According to document F, “That if anyone shall write, print, utter, or…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (John Adams and Jefferson) were running for president. The Federalists wanted a strong central government with more power than what they had at that time. The Anti-Federalists were the exact opposite. They wanted a small central government with minimal power, that gave most of the power to the states. These two ideas would then become the main topics of debate for future government campaigns.…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    While the Federalist were in favor of ratifying the Constitution because they wanted a strong central…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The federalist beliefs on government .The federalists believed that the people neede a stronge government. One of the reasons the federalists thought a strong government was needed was to be able to handle trade desputes witch the articles…

    • 210 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    They guaranteed that the Federal government would dependably perform the will of the general population. On the other hand, Jefferson would not bargain and demanded lecturing his old fashioned fear inspired notions. Jefferson even went so far as to say, "Every government degenerates when trusted to the rulers…alone. The people themselves are its only safe depositories." Unfortunately, this troubled rationality did not work extremely well for the American individuals by any stretch of the imagination; it supported the improvement of groups, a clear irreconcilable situation, and no place for trade off. Every government degenerates when trusted to the rulers…alone. The people themselves are its only safe depositories. The Democratic Republicans indicated on numerous occasions that they were most adroit at bringing about inward strife as opposed to fathoming anything. Plainly Jefferson's uncompromising and accusatory rationalities just served to separation Americans, open up interstate clashes, and harm the quality of the United…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federalists v. Anti-Federalists The Federalists; John Day, Alexander Hamilton, George Washington, and James Madison, were supporters of the constitution. They believed that our nation needed a strong federal government. The reasoning behind their belief was because they found it was necessary that a strong federal government be made for the entire country. As said in the Federalist Paper number it mentions the idea of checks and balances which would prevent one branch from growing too strong and it would limit the governments power.…

    • 153 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    After Articles of Confederation it was seen necessary to repeal the Articles and create one that is perfect for everyone in the country, but it wasn’t that easy. Federalists claimed that we needed a strong central government to prevent rebellions such as Shay’s Rebellion that damaged the states while the Anti-Federalists feared that a strong central government could turn into a kingdom like U.K. which they have fought and damaged deeply, recently. In different topics such as Congress, Executive, Judicial and whether we needed to have Bill of Rights or not, both parties debated and found solutions that still after hundreds of years works……

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    take home exam

    • 588 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Democratic-Republicans believed in decentralized powers; which meant letting individual states have most of the power. They wanted more power to the people, and favored freedom of speech and press. Democratic-Republicans were the party of the common man. They also believed in a strict interpretation of the constitution; meaning if it wasn’t in the constitution then the federal government had no right to control those affairs. A…

    • 588 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays